8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Carsongreen2 sentences2002See also State v. Carson, 21 Wash. App. 318 , 584 P.2d 990 (1978) (presence or absence of exigent circumstances sufficient to constitute an exception to the knock and wait rule is factual determination to be made by trial court); State v. Young, 76 Wash.2d 212, 217 , 455 P.2d 595 (1969); State v. Edwards, 20 Wash.App. 648 , 581 P.2d 154 (1978); State v. Woodall 32 Wash.App. 407 , 647 P.2d 1051 (1982), rev'd on other grounds, 100 Wash.2d 74 , 666 P.2d 364 (1983). 2002App. 318 , 584 P.2d 990 (1978) (presence or absence of exigent circumstances sufficient to constitute an exception to the knock and wait rule is factual determination to be made by trial court); State v. Young, 76 Wn.2d 212, 217 , 455 P.2d 595 (1969); State v. Edwards, 20 Wn. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Hilliardgreen1 sentence1980See State v. Hilliard, 18 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Talleygreen1 sentence1980See State v. Talley, 14 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Young
green
2 sentences2002App. 318 , 584 P.2d 990 (1978) (presence or absence of exigent circumstances sufficient to constitute an exception to the knock and wait rule is factual determination to be made by trial court); State v. Young, 76 Wn.2d 212, 217 , 455 P.2d 595 (1969); State v. Edwards, 20 Wn. 2002App. 318 , 584 P.2d 990 (1978) (presence or absence of exigent circumstances sufficient to constitute an exception to the knock and wait rule is factual determination to be made by trial court); State v. Young, 76 Wn.2d 212, 217 , 455 P.2d 595 (1969); State v. Edwards, 20 Wn. | 3 | 1994–2002 |
State v. Woodall
green
2 sentences2002See also State v. Carson, 21 Wash. App. 318 , 584 P.2d 990 (1978) (presence or absence of exigent circumstances sufficient to constitute an exception to the knock and wait rule is factual determination to be made by trial court); State v. Young, 76 Wash.2d 212, 217 , 455 P.2d 595 (1969); State v. Edwards, 20 Wash.App. 648 , 581 P.2d 154 (1978); State v. Woodall 32 Wash.App. 407 , 647 P.2d 1051 (1982), rev'd on other grounds, 100 Wash.2d 74 , 666 P.2d 364 (1983). 2002See also State v. Carson, 21 Wash. App. 318 , 584 P.2d 990 (1978) (presence or absence of exigent circumstances sufficient to constitute an exception to the knock and wait rule is factual determination to be made by trial court); State v. Young, 76 Wash.2d 212, 217 , 455 P.2d 595 (1969); State v. Edwards, 20 Wash.App. 648 , 581 P.2d 154 (1978); State v. Woodall 32 Wash.App. 407 , 647 P.2d 1051 (1982), rev'd on other grounds, 100 Wash.2d 74 , 666 P.2d 364 (1983). | 2 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Edwards
neutral
2 sentences2002See also State v. Carson, 21 Wash. App. 318 , 584 P.2d 990 (1978) (presence or absence of exigent circumstances sufficient to constitute an exception to the knock and wait rule is factual determination to be made by trial court); State v. Young, 76 Wash.2d 212, 217 , 455 P.2d 595 (1969); State v. Edwards, 20 Wash.App. 648 , 581 P.2d 154 (1978); State v. Woodall 32 Wash.App. 407 , 647 P.2d 1051 (1982), rev'd on other grounds, 100 Wash.2d 74 , 666 P.2d 364 (1983). 2002App. 318 , 584 P.2d 990 (1978) (presence or absence of exigent circumstances sufficient to constitute an exception to the knock and wait rule is factual determination to be made by trial court); State v. Young, 76 Wn.2d 212, 217 , 455 P.2d 595 (1969); State v. Edwards, 20 Wn. | 2 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Woodall
green
2 sentences2002See also State v. Carson, 21 Wash. App. 318 , 584 P.2d 990 (1978) (presence or absence of exigent circumstances sufficient to constitute an exception to the knock and wait rule is factual determination to be made by trial court); State v. Young, 76 Wash.2d 212, 217 , 455 P.2d 595 (1969); State v. Edwards, 20 Wash.App. 648 , 581 P.2d 154 (1978); State v. Woodall 32 Wash.App. 407 , 647 P.2d 1051 (1982), rev'd on other grounds, 100 Wash.2d 74 , 666 P.2d 364 (1983). 2002See also State v. Carson, 21 Wash. App. 318 , 584 P.2d 990 (1978) (presence or absence of exigent circumstances sufficient to constitute an exception to the knock and wait rule is factual determination to be made by trial court); State v. Young, 76 Wash.2d 212, 217 , 455 P.2d 595 (1969); State v. Edwards, 20 Wash.App. 648 , 581 P.2d 154 (1978); State v. Woodall 32 Wash.App. 407 , 647 P.2d 1051 (1982), rev'd on other grounds, 100 Wash.2d 74 , 666 P.2d 364 (1983). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Alldredge
green
2 sentences1997DISCUSSION "The knock-and-wait rule is part of the constitutional requirement that search warrants be reasonably executed.” State v. Alldredge, 73 Wn. 1997App. 171, 175 , 868 P.2d 183 (1994) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Garcia-Hernandez
green
1 sentence1994One requires that the police knock and announce their identity *175 and purpose. 7 State v. Coyle, 95 Wn.2d 1, 6 , 621 P.2d 1256 (1980); State v. Garcia-Hernandez, 67 Wn. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Coyle
green
2 sentences1994One requires that the police knock and announce their identity *175 and purpose. 7 State v. Coyle, 95 Wn.2d 1, 6 , 621 P.2d 1256 (1980); State v. Garcia-Hernandez, 67 Wn. 1994One requires that the police knock and announce their identity *175 and purpose. 7 State v. Coyle, 95 Wn.2d 1, 6 , 621 P.2d 1256 (1980); State v. Garcia-Hernandez, 67 Wn. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Myers
green
2 sentences1994State v. Myers, 102 Wn.2d 548, 552 , 689 P.2d 38 (1984); Coyle, 95 Wn.2d at 6 ; State v. Young, 76 Wn.2d 212 , *176 214-15, 455 P.2d 595 (1969); Lehman, 40 Wn. 1994State v. Myers, 102 Wn.2d 548, 552 , 689 P.2d 38 (1984); Coyle, 95 Wn.2d at 6 ; State v. Young, 76 Wn.2d 212 , *176 214-15, 455 P.2d 595 (1969); Lehman, 40 Wn. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Illinois v. Gates
green
2 sentences1983RCW 10.31.040. [6] The United States Supreme Court recently overruled the Aguilar-Spinelli 2-pronged test in Illinois v. Gates, ___ U.S. ___, 76 L.Ed.2d 527 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 (1983) and established the more flexible "totality of the circumstances" test. 1983RCW 10.31.040. [6] The United States Supreme Court recently overruled the Aguilar-Spinelli 2-pronged test in Illinois v. Gates, ___ U.S. ___, 76 L.Ed.2d 527 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 (1983) and established the more flexible "totality of the circumstances" test. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
State v. Ellis
green
2 sentences1983State v. Ellis, 21 Wn. 1983State v. Ellis, 21 Wn. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
State v. Hatcher
green
1 sentence1979State v. Hatcher, 3 Wn. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.