8 West Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 2016–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dunn v. Rockwellgreen2 sentences2020Va. 43 , 689 S.E.2d 255 (2009) (“The statute of limitation for a civil conspiracy claim is determined by the nature of the underlying conduct on which the claim for conspiracy is based.”). 2019Next, we have held that “[t]he statute of limitation for a civil conspiracy claim is determined by the nature of the underlying conduct on which the claim for conspiracy is based.” Syl. pt. 10, Dunn v. Rockwell, 225 W. | 4 | 5 |
Nicolet, Inc. v. Nuttgreen2 sentences2017Nev. 2011) (applying Nevada law; observing that “Nevada has not stated that it would require each conspirator to owe the duty that forms the predicate for the underlying tort".; -and concluding that “Nevada does not. require that each conspirator owe' ah independent' duty to the plaintiff to support a civil conspiracy claim."); Nicolet, Inc. v. Nutt, 525 A.2d 146, 150 (Del. 1987) (agreeing with, but finding irrelevant, defendant’s' argument that it had no duty to warn customers because liability attaches "as a result of the active misconduct, of intentionally suppressing material information” 2017Nev. 2011) (applying Nevada law; observing that “Nevada has not stated that it would require each conspirator to owe the duty that forms the predicate for the underlying tort”; and concluding that “Nevada does not require that each conspirator owe an independent duty to the plaintiff to support a civil conspiracy claim.”); Nicolet, Inc. v. Nutt, 525 A.2d 146, 150 (Del. 1987) (agreeing with, but finding irrelevant, defendant’s argument that it had no duty to warn customers because liability attaches “as a result of the active misconduct of intentionally suppressing material information” and fin | 2 | 2 |
Jane Doe-1 v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saintsgreen1 sentence2026Va. 428, 461 , 801 S.E.2d 443, 476 (2017) (citation modified) (“A civil conspiracy claim must produce at least 7 Tn its order, the circuit court provided a detailed analysis to support these determinations. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Chavers v. Gatke Corp.green2 sentences2017Nicolet would be jointly and severally liable with its co-conspirators for resulting damages.”); but see, e.g., Chavers v. Gatke Corp., 107 Cal.App.4th 606 , 132 Cal.Rptr.2d 198, 201 (2003) (citing Applied Equip. 2017Nicolet would be jointly and severally liable with its co-conspirators for resulting damages.”); but see, e.g., Chavers v. Gatke Corp., 107 Cal.App.4th 606 , 132 Cal.Rptr.2d 198, 201 (2003) (citing Applied Equip. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sedlock v. Moyle
green
1 sentence2024“Since the preference is to decide cases on their merits, courts presented with a motion to dismiss . . . construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, taking all allegations as true.” Sedlock v. Moyle, 222 W. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.