general disclosure requirement (West Virginia) · Go Syfert
← West Virginia issues

general disclosure requirement in West Virginia

8 West Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Queen v. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc.green
wva · 1987 · cited in 5 West Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2013–2024
2 sentences

2024Va. 95, 97 , 365 S.E.2d 375, 377 (1987) (“The party claiming exemption from the general disclosure requirement under [WVFOIA] has the burden of showing the express applicability of such exemption to the material requested.”).

2017“The party claiming exemption from the general disclosure requirement under West Virginia Code § 29B-1-4 has the burden of showing the express applicability of such exemption to the material requested.” Syllabus point 7, Queen v. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc., 179 W.

15
Charleston Gazette v. Smithersgreen
wva · 2013 · cited in 2 West Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2020–2024
2 sentences

2024Hosps., Inc., 179 W.Va. 95 , 365 S.E.2d 375 (1987).” Syllabus Point 4, Charleston Gazette v. Smithers, 232 W.

2024Pt. 4, Smithers, 232 W.

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Reager Ex Rel. Reager v. Anderson green
wva · 1988
2 sentences

1997We qualified the general disclosure requirement of Vapor Corp. in syllabus point 5 of Reager v. Anderson, 179 W.Va. 691 , 371 S.E.2d 619 (1988): Disclosure to the jury of the general nature of a "Mary Carter” settlement agreement is not required in each case; such disclosure lies within the sound discretion of the trial court.

1997We qualified the general disclosure requirement of Vapor Corp. in syllabus point 5 of Reager v. Anderson, 179 W.Va. 691 , 371 S.E.2d 619 (1988): Disclosure to the jury of the general nature of a "Mary Carter” settlement agreement is not required in each case; such disclosure lies within the sound discretion of the trial court.

11997–1997
Daily Gazette Co., Inc. v. Withrow green
wva · 1986
2 sentences

1987Daily Gazette Co. v. Withrow, 177 W.Va. 110 , 350 S.E.2d 738 (1986).

1987Daily Gazette Co. v. Withrow, 177 W.Va. 110 , 350 S.E.2d 738 (1986).

11987–1987

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WV § W. Va. Code § 29B-1-4 (7) WV § W. Va. Code § 29B-1-1 (6) WV § W. Va. Code § 29B-1-3 (4) WV § W. Va. Code § 29B-1-5 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

WV 8 (1987–2024) PA 7 (1998–2012) CA 2 (1990–2004) HI 2 (1996–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check