7 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1933–1997 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sulger v. Arizona Corporation Commissiongreen2 sentences1972See Sulger v. Arizona Corporation Commission, 5 Ariz.App. 69 , 423 P.2d 145 (1967). 1972See Sulger v. Arizona Corporation Commission, 5 Ariz.App. 69 , 423 P.2d 145 (1967). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Superior Court of Maricopa County
green
2 sentences1997Id. at 328-29 , 599 P.2d at 781-82 . 1997Id. at 328-29 , 599 P.2d at 781-82 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission
green
2 sentences1995In Tucson Electric, our supreme court held “that evidence of events occurring subsequent to [a] Corporation Commission hearing is not admissible.” 132 Ariz. at 244 , 645 P.2d at 235 . 1995In Tucson Electric, our supreme court held “that evidence of events occurring subsequent to [a] Corporation Commission hearing is not admissible.” 132 Ariz. at 244 , 645 P.2d at 235 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Mullet v. Miller
green
1 sentence1993In Mullet v. Miller, Division Two of this court remanded a criminal prosecution to the trial court to determine whether an administrative penalty of $380,000 imposed by the corporation commission for a violation of the securities laws, “was rationally related to making the state whole.” 168 Ariz. at 597 , 826 P.2d at 254. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Gibbons v. Arizona Corp. Commission
green
2 sentences1982Church v. Arizona Corporation Commission, 94 Ariz. 107 , 382 P.2d 222 (1963); Gibbons v. Arizona Corporation Commission, 75 Ariz. 214 , 254 P.2d 1024 (1953); Simms, supra. The reasons are twofold. 1982Church v. Arizona Corporation Commission, 94 Ariz. 107 , 382 P.2d 222 (1963); Gibbons v. Arizona Corporation Commission, 75 Ariz. 214 , 254 P.2d 1024 (1953); Simms, supra. The reasons are twofold. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
State Ex Rel. Church v. Arizona Corp. Commission
green
2 sentences1982Church v. Arizona Corporation Commission, 94 Ariz. 107 , 382 P.2d 222 (1963); Gibbons v. Arizona Corporation Commission, 75 Ariz. 214 , 254 P.2d 1024 (1953); Simms, supra. The reasons are twofold. 1982Church v. Arizona Corporation Commission, 94 Ariz. 107 , 382 P.2d 222 (1963); Gibbons v. Arizona Corporation Commission, 75 Ariz. 214 , 254 P.2d 1024 (1953); Simms, supra. The reasons are twofold. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Visco v. State Ex Rel. Pickrell
green
2 sentences1966Pickrell, 95 Ariz. 154 , 388 P.2d 155 (1963) and appellants appeal. 1966Pickrell, 95 Ariz. 154 , 388 P.2d 155 (1963) and appellants appeal. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Gardner v. Tatum
green
2 sentences1933In the case of Gardner v. Tatum, 81 Cal. 370 , 22 Pac. 880 , a physician, who had not secured a certificate authorizing him to practice medicine as required by the laws of California, rendered servibes and thereafter brought suit against Ms patient and the court held he could not recover. 1933In the case of Gardner v. Tatum, 81 Cal. 370 , 22 Pac. 880 , a physician, who had not secured a certificate authorizing him to practice medicine as required by the laws of California, rendered servibes and thereafter brought suit against Ms patient and the court held he could not recover. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.