qualified member bar in Arizona

7 Arizona opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
Copper State Bank v. Saggiogreen arizctapp · 1983 · cited in 5 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 1985–2024 2 sentences 2024"It is well established that where a party conducts his case in propria persona he is entitled to no more consideration than if he had been represented by counsel, and he is held to the same familiarity with required procedures . . . as would be attributed to a qualified member of the bar." Copper State Bank v. Saggio, 139 Ariz. 438, 441 (App. 1983). 2023We hold Mother “to the same familiarity with required procedures and the same notice of statutes and local rules as would be attributed to a qualified member of the bar.” Copper State Bank v. Saggio, 139 Ariz. 438, 441 (App. 1983). 5 CAVNESS v. CAVNESS-ENGSTRAND Decision of the Court be nonsensical, since failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted must be raised—if at all—before a responsive pleading. ¶15 Therefore, the superior court did not err in rejecting Mother’s procedural arguments.	4	5
Daou v. Harrisgreen ariz · 1984 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024 1 sentence 2024"A party's mere neglect, inadvertence, or forgetfulness without a reasonable excuse, however, does not warrant relief, meaning the party must suffer the consequences of the judgment." Aloia v. Gore, 252 Ariz. 548 , 552, ¶ 15 (App. 2022). "[T]he test of what is excusable is whether the neglect or inadvertence is such as might be the act of a reasonably prudent person under similar circumstances." Daou v. Harris, 139 Ariz. 353, 359 (1984).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

Case	Cited	Years
Smith v. Rabb green ariz · 1963 2 sentences 1983Smith v. Rabb, 95 Ariz. 49 , 386 P.2d 649 (1963); Homecraft Corporation v. Fimbres, 119 Ariz. 299 , 580 P.2d 760 (App. 1978); Bloch v. Bentfield, 1 Ariz. App. 412 , 403 P.2d 559 (1965). 1983Smith v. Rabb, 95 Ariz. 49 , 386 P.2d 649 (1963); Homecraft Corporation v. Fimbres, 119 Ariz. 299 , 580 P.2d 760 (App. 1978); Bloch v. Bentfield, 1 Ariz. App. 412 , 403 P.2d 559 (1965).	2	1983–1983
Homecraft Corp. v. Fimbres green arizctapp · 1978 2 sentences 1983Smith v. Rabb, 95 Ariz. 49 , 386 P.2d 649 (1963); Homecraft Corporation v. Fimbres, 119 Ariz. 299 , 580 P.2d 760 (App. 1978); Bloch v. Bentfield, 1 Ariz. App. 412 , 403 P.2d 559 (1965). 1983Smith v. Rabb, 95 Ariz. 49 , 386 P.2d 649 (1963); Homecraft Corporation v. Fimbres, 119 Ariz. 299 , 580 P.2d 760 (App. 1978); Bloch v. Bentfield, 1 Ariz. App. 412 , 403 P.2d 559 (1965).	2	1983–1983
Bloch v. Bentfield green arizctapp · 1965 2 sentences 1983Smith v. Rabb, 95 Ariz. 49 , 386 P.2d 649 (1963); Homecraft Corporation v. Fimbres, 119 Ariz. 299 , 580 P.2d 760 (App. 1978); Bloch v. Bentfield, 1 Ariz. App. 412 , 403 P.2d 559 (1965). 1983Smith v. Rabb, 95 Ariz. 49 , 386 P.2d 649 (1963); Homecraft Corporation v. Fimbres, 119 Ariz. 299 , 580 P.2d 760 (App. 1978); Bloch v. Bentfield, 1 Ariz. App. 412 , 403 P.2d 559 (1965).	2	1983–1983

Statutes the citing opinions construe

AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101 (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

AZ 7 (1983–2024) MO 2 (1976–1989)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check