7 Colorado opinions name it 1 courts 2024–2026 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Marriage of Balansongreen2 sentences2026Applicable Legal Principles ¶8 In a dissolution of marriage proceeding, the court must divide marital property as it deems just. § 14-10-113(1), C.R.S 2025. “[M]arital property” is all property acquired by either spouse after the date of marriage except property described in the four statutory exceptions set forth in section 14-10-113(2)(a)-(d). § 14-10-113(2); see In re Marriage of Blaine, 2021 CO 13, ¶ 3 . 3 ¶9 When dividing marital property, the court considers all relevant factors under section 14-10-113(1), including each spouse’s (1) contribution to the acquisition of the marital propert 2026When dividing marital property, the court considers all relevant factors under section 14-10-113(1), including each spouse’s (1) contribution to the acquisition of the marital property; (2) awarded property; (3) economic circumstances; and 6 (4) increased, decreased, or depleted separate property. § 14-10- 113(1)(a)-(d); see Balanson, 25 P.3d at 35 . | 2 | 3 |
In Re Marriage of Gallogreen2 sentences2024“The key to an equitable distribution is fairness, not mathematical precision.” In re Marriage of Gallo, 752 P.2d 47, 55 (Colo. 1988). ¶ 11 To achieve an equitable division, the court considers all relevant factors, which may include the parties’ contributions to the acquisition of marital property, the value of property set aside to each party, the parties’ economic circumstances, and the depletion of a party’s separate property for marital purposes. 4 § 14-10-113(1)(a)-(d). 2024“The key to an equitable distribution is fairness, not mathematical precision.” In re Marriage of Gallo, 752 P.2d 47, 55 (Colo. 1988). ¶ 11 To achieve an equitable division, the court considers all relevant factors, which may include the parties’ contributions to the acquisition of marital property, the value of property set aside to each party, the parties’ economic circumstances, and the depletion of a party’s separate property for marital purposes. 4 § 14-10-113(1)(a)-(d). | 2 | 2 |
In re Marriage of Blainegreen1 sentence2026Applicable Legal Principles ¶8 In a dissolution of marriage proceeding, the court must divide marital property as it deems just. § 14-10-113(1), C.R.S 2025. “[M]arital property” is all property acquired by either spouse after the date of marriage except property described in the four statutory exceptions set forth in section 14-10-113(2)(a)-(d). § 14-10-113(2); see In re Marriage of Blaine, 2021 CO 13, ¶ 3 . 3 ¶9 When dividing marital property, the court considers all relevant factors under section 14-10-113(1), including each spouse’s (1) contribution to the acquisition of the marital propert | 1 | 1 |
People Ex Rel. J.R.T. v. Martinezgreen1 sentence2026People v. Martinez, 70 P.3d 474, 480 (Colo. 2003). ¶ 13 Whether a party is voluntarily underemployed is typically a question of fact for the district court, and we won’t disturb that determination if it has record support. | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Marriage of Simongreen1 sentence2024In re Marriage of Simon , 856 P.2d 47, 50 (Colo. App. 1993). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
of Wright
green
2 sentences2026“The property division must be equitable, but not necessarily equal.” In re Marriage of Wright, 2020 COA 11, ¶ 3 . 2026“The property division must be equitable, but not necessarily equal.” In re Marriage of Wright, 2020 COA 11, ¶ 3 . | 2 | 2026–2026 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.