7 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. McNairgreen2 sentences2015This includes its rule, which is consistent with this State’s longstanding rule regarding the admission of evidence, that a decision to admit evidence under Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 404 (b) is reviewed for a “ ‘clear abuse of discretion.’ ” United States v. McNair, 605 F3d 1152, 1203, n. 69 (11th Cir. 2010) (citation omitted). 2015This includes its rule, which is consistent with this State’s longstanding rule regarding the admission of evidence, that a decision to admit evidence under Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 404 (b) is reviewed for a “ ‘clear abuse of discretion.’ ” United States v. McNair, 605 F3d 1152, 1203, n. 69 (11th Cir. 2010) (citation omitted). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Brinkleygreen2 sentences2025See Brinkley, 316 Ga. at 690 . 2025See Brinkley, 316 Ga. at 690 . | 1 | 1 |
Doman v. Stapletongreen2 sentences2021See Doman v. Stapleton, 272 Ga. App. 114, 118 (2) ( 611 SE2d 673 ) (2005). 4 As the relevant facts are complicated and the proceedings below convoluted,4 4 Our ability to ascertain the course of the proceedings in the arbitration has been made more difficult by how portions of the record from the arbitration were made a part of the record in the superior court. 2021See Doman v. Stapleton, 272 Ga. App. 114, 118 (2) ( 611 SE2d 673 ) (2005). 4 As the relevant facts are complicated and the proceedings below convoluted,4 4 Our ability to ascertain the course of the proceedings in the arbitration has been made more difficult by how portions of the record from the arbitration were made a part of the record in the superior court. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Frostgreen2 sentences2016And, in this regard, “[m]any provisions of the new Evidence Code were borrowed from the Federal Rules of Evidence, and when our courts consider the meaning of these provisions, they *327 look to decisions of the federal appeals courts construing and applying the Federal Rules, especially the decisions of the Eleventh Circuit.” (Citation omitted.) State v. Frost, 297 Ga. 296, 299 ( 773 SE2d 700 ) (2015). 4 For plain error review of rulings on evidence, the Eleventh Circuit’s test tracks the four-pronged standard we adopted in Kelly, supra. 5 Accordingly, the same plain error standard that we ad 2016And, in this regard, “[m]any provisions of the new Evidence Code were borrowed from the Federal Rules of Evidence, and when our courts consider the meaning of these provisions, they *327 look to decisions of the federal appeals courts construing and applying the Federal Rules, especially the decisions of the Eleventh Circuit.” (Citation omitted.) State v. Frost, 297 Ga. 296, 299 ( 773 SE2d 700 ) (2015). 4 For plain error review of rulings on evidence, the Eleventh Circuit’s test tracks the four-pronged standard we adopted in Kelly, supra. 5 Accordingly, the same plain error standard that we ad | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Ellisorgreen2 sentences2015United States v. Ellisor, 522 F3d 1255, 1267 (11th Cir. 2008). 4 A leading treatise on federal evidence law says that this test is the substantial equivalent of the test applied by other federal courts, see 2 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 404.21 [1] [b]-[m], but even if the Eleventh Circuit test is in conflict with that of other federal circuit courts, the General Assembly has expressed its intent to follow the Eleventh Circuit as of January 1, 2013, in the event of such a conflict. 2015United States v. Ellisor, 522 F3d 1255, 1267 (11th Cir. 2008). 4 A leading treatise on federal evidence law says that this test is the substantial equivalent of the test applied by other federal courts, see 2 Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 404.21 [1] [b]-[m], but even if the Eleventh Circuit test is in conflict with that of other federal circuit courts, the General Assembly has expressed its intent to follow the Eleventh Circuit as of January 1, 2013, in the event of such a conflict. | 1 | 1 |
Bradshaw v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Bradshaw v. State, 296 Ga. 650, 655 (3) ( 769 SE2d 892 ) (2015). 2015Bradshaw v. State, 296 Ga. 650, 655 (3) ( 769 SE2d 892 ) (2015). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Johnny C. McClain v. Metabolife International, Inc
green
2 sentences2025Because Rule 702 (b) is materially identical to Federal Rule 702, we conclude that Georgia courts should apply the Eleventh Circuit standard as enunciated in McClain v. Metabolife Intl., Inc., 401 F3d 1233 (11th Cir. 2005) and its progeny. 2025Because Rule 702 (b) is materially identical to Federal Rule 702, we conclude that Georgia courts should apply the Eleventh Circuit standard as enunciated in McClain v. Metabolife Intl., Inc., 401 F3d 1233 (11th Cir. 2005) and its progeny. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Kelly
green
1 sentence2016And, in this regard, “[m]any provisions of the new Evidence Code were borrowed from the Federal Rules of Evidence, and when our courts consider the meaning of these provisions, they *327 look to decisions of the federal appeals courts construing and applying the Federal Rules, especially the decisions of the Eleventh Circuit.” (Citation omitted.) State v. Frost, 297 Ga. 296, 299 ( 773 SE2d 700 ) (2015). 4 For plain error review of rulings on evidence, the Eleventh Circuit’s test tracks the four-pronged standard we adopted in Kelly, supra. 5 Accordingly, the same plain error standard that we ad | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Connecticut v. Johnson
green
1 sentence1985An adverse contention “failed to command a majority” in Connecticut v. Johnson, 460 U. S. 73 (103 SC 969, 74 LE2d 823) (1983), thereby leaving the Eleventh Circuit’s rule intact. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.