7 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pounds v. Stategreen2 sentences2021See Pounds, 309 Ga. at 385 (4). 2021See Hann, 292 Ga. App. at 720 (1) (a premature notice of appeal will ripen upon the filing of a trial court order granting, overruling, or otherwise disposing of a motion for a new trial); accord Pounds, 309 Ga. at 385 (4) n. 12. | 1 | 1 |
Dees v. Logangreen1 sentence2021See Hann, 292 Ga. App. at 720 (1) (a premature notice of appeal will ripen upon the filing of a trial court order granting, overruling, or otherwise disposing of a motion for a new trial); accord Pounds, 309 Ga. at 385 (4) n. 12. | 1 | 1 |
Allen v. Stategreen2 sentences2020Here, the trial court specifically stated in its order that it was denying Hodges’s motion for new trial after “consideration of the pleadings, the transcript of proceedings, and [the] applicable law.” “The court did not state the incorrect standard in its order, and nothing in the record indicates that the court was unaware of its responsibility.” (Citations omitted.) Allen v. State, 296 Ga. 738, 741 (2) ( 770 SE2d 625 ) (2015). 2020Here, the trial court specifically stated in its order that it was denying Hodges’s motion for new trial after “consideration of the pleadings, the transcript of proceedings, and [the] applicable law.” “The court did not state the incorrect standard in its order, and nothing in the record indicates that the court was unaware of its responsibility.” (Citations omitted.) Allen v. State, 296 Ga. 738, 741 (2) ( 770 SE2d 625 ) (2015). | 1 | 1 |
Cato Oil & Grease Co. v. Lewisgreen2 sentences2019See also Cato Oil & Grease Co. v. Lewis, 250 Ga. 24, 25 (2) ( 295 SE2d 527 ) (1982) (error to grant a motion for default judgment prior to ruling on a pending dispositive motion to strike complaint). 2019See also Cato Oil & Grease Co. v. Lewis, 250 Ga. 24, 25 (2) ( 295 SE2d 527 ) (1982) (error to grant a motion for default judgment prior to ruling on a pending dispositive motion to strike complaint). | 1 | 1 |
Migmar, Inc. v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2019Moreover Hodges’s motion for summary judgment as to the cross-claims was still pending when the trial court entered a default judgment against him. “[A] trial court should not enter a default judgment while a dispositive motion [for summary judgment] is pending[.]” Migmar, Inc. v. Williams, 281 Ga. App. 870, 871 (2) ( 637 SE2d 471 ) (2006). 2019Moreover Hodges’s motion for summary judgment as to the cross-claims was still pending when the trial court entered a default judgment against him. “[A] trial court should not enter a default judgment while a dispositive motion [for summary judgment] is pending[.]” Migmar, Inc. v. Williams, 281 Ga. App. 870, 871 (2) ( 637 SE2d 471 ) (2006). | 1 | 1 |
Scott v. Stategreen2 sentences2011Under these facts, it cannot be said that such a result would be `highly improbable.'" (Citation omitted.) Scott v. State, 281 Ga. 373, 377 (3), 637 S.E.2d 652 (2006). 2011Under these facts, it cannot be said that such a result would be `highly improbable.'" (Citation omitted.) Scott v. State, 281 Ga. 373, 377 (3), 637 S.E.2d 652 (2006). | 1 | 1 |
Maxwell v. Stategreen2 sentences1995Over Hodges' objection, a witness was permitted to testify that seven or eight years previously, Hodges told him that if he were a "hit man," he would bind his victim's hands behind his back with wire or tape, put him on his knees and shoot him with a "high-powered weapon." In Maxwell v. State, 262 Ga. 73, 75 (3), 414 S.E.2d 470 (1992), this Court held that it was error to allow the state to introduce evidence that defendant had engaged in two conversations in which he explained how he would kill someone. 1995Over Hodges' objection, a witness was permitted to testify that seven or eight years previously, Hodges told him that if he were a "hit man," he would bind his victim's hands behind his back with wire or tape, put him on his knees and shoot him with a "high-powered weapon." In Maxwell v. State, 262 Ga. 73, 75 (3), 414 S.E.2d 470 (1992), this Court held that it was error to allow the state to introduce evidence that defendant had engaged in two conversations in which he explained how he would kill someone. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Simpson v. State
green
1 sentence2020In our order, we again noted that “whether to impose consecutive or concurrent sentences for multiple offenses is within the trial court’s discretion,” Simpson, 310 Ga. App. at 64 n. 4, and again concluded that Hodges had not raised a colorable void sentence claim. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Manos
green
2 sentences2001Hodges argues that because Officer Thompson testified that anyone could make the decision to allow cars to proceed, this Court’s decision in State v. Manos, 237 Ga. App. 699 ( 516 SE2d 548 ) (1999) demands reversal. 2001Hodges argues that because Officer Thompson testified that anyone could make the decision to allow cars to proceed, this Court’s decision in State v. Manos, 237 Ga. App. 699 ( 516 SE2d 548 ) (1999) demands reversal. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Walker v. State
green
2 sentences1995Walker v. State, 260 Ga. 737 (1), 399 S.E.2d 199 (1991). 1995Walker v. State, 260 Ga. 737 (1), 399 S.E.2d 199 (1991). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.