7 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hook v. Bergengreen2 sentences2017See Hook v. Bergen, 286 Ga. App. 258, 261 (1) ( 649 SE2d 313 ) (2007) (“[T]he denial of an application for discretionary appeal is an adjudication on the merits of the underlying order and acts as res judicata in subsequent proceedings.”). 2017See Hook v. Bergen, 286 Ga. App. 258, 261 (1) ( 649 SE2d 313 ) (2007) (“[T]he denial of an application for discretionary appeal is an adjudication on the merits of the underlying order and acts as res judicata in subsequent proceedings.”). | 1 | 1 |
Penland v. Stategreen2 sentences2016“The judgment of the court on all issues of fact concerning the ability ofa party to pay costs or give bond shall be final.” OCGA § 9-15-2 (a) (2); see Penland v. State, 256 Ga. 641, 641 ( 352 SE2d 385 ) (1987) (upholding constitutionality of this rule of finality on questions of indigence in a criminal case, including for the purpose of obtaining a copy of a trial transcript at government expense). 2016“The judgment of the court on all issues of fact concerning the ability ofa party to pay costs or give bond shall be final.” OCGA § 9-15-2 (a) (2); see Penland v. State, 256 Ga. 641, 641 ( 352 SE2d 385 ) (1987) (upholding constitutionality of this rule of finality on questions of indigence in a criminal case, including for the purpose of obtaining a copy of a trial transcript at government expense). | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences2006See Williams v. State, 188 Ga. App. 496, 498 (2) ( 373 SE2d 281 ) (1988); Murphy v. State, 158 Ga. App. 278, 279 (2) ( 279 SE2d 728 ) (1981). 2. 2006See Williams v. State, 188 Ga. App. 496, 498 (2) ( 373 SE2d 281 ) (1988); Murphy v. State, 158 Ga. App. 278, 279 (2) ( 279 SE2d 728 ) (1981). 2. | 1 | 1 |
Murphy v. Stategreen2 sentences2006See Williams v. State, 188 Ga. App. 496, 498 (2) ( 373 SE2d 281 ) (1988); Murphy v. State, 158 Ga. App. 278, 279 (2) ( 279 SE2d 728 ) (1981). 2. 2006See Williams v. State, 188 Ga. App. 496, 498 (2) ( 373 SE2d 281 ) (1988); Murphy v. State, 158 Ga. App. 278, 279 (2) ( 279 SE2d 728 ) (1981). 2. | 1 | 1 |
Gordon v. Stategreen2 sentences1995The trial court agreed that the comment was improper, and although it denied Roberson’s motion for a mistrial, the court instructed the jury that the comment was improper and should not be considered under any circumstances. “ ‘(T)he trial judge in passing upon a motion for mistrial on ac count of alleged improper argument is vested with a broad and sound discretion, and his ruling will not be controlled by this court unless manifestly abused.’ [Cit.]” Gordon v. State, 210 Ga. App. 224, 225 (1) ( 435 SE2d 742 ) (1993). 1995The trial court agreed that the comment was improper, and although it denied Roberson’s motion for a mistrial, the court instructed the jury that the comment was improper and should not be considered under any circumstances. “ ‘(T)he trial judge in passing upon a motion for mistrial on ac count of alleged improper argument is vested with a broad and sound discretion, and his ruling will not be controlled by this court unless manifestly abused.’ [Cit.]” Gordon v. State, 210 Ga. App. 224, 225 (1) ( 435 SE2d 742 ) (1993). | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Stategreen2 sentences1995There was no showing that Roberson could not receive a fair trial due to pretrial publicity or the prejudice of individual jurors. 2 Brown v. State, 262 Ga. 833, 835 (7) ( 426 SE2d 559 ) (1993). 1995There was no showing that Roberson could not receive a fair trial due to pretrial publicity or the prejudice of individual jurors. 2 Brown v. State, 262 Ga. 833, 835 (7) ( 426 SE2d 559 ) (1993). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Olivergreen2 sentences1994This case is controlled by our decision in State v. Oliver, 188 Ga. App. 47, 50 (2) ( 372 SE2d 256 ) (1988), in which we held that an expert witness testifying that the victim could distinguish between the truth and a lie amounted to improper bolstering of the victim’s credibility. 1994This case is controlled by our decision in State v. Oliver, 188 Ga. App. 47, 50 (2) ( 372 SE2d 256 ) (1988), in which we held that an expert witness testifying that the victim could distinguish between the truth and a lie amounted to improper bolstering of the victim’s credibility. | 1 | 1 |
Norton v. Stategreen2 sentences1994See Norton v. State, 263 Ga. 448, 449-450 (3) ( 435 SE2d 30 ) (1993). 3. 1994See Norton v. State, 263 Ga. 448, 449-450 (3) ( 435 SE2d 30 ) (1993). 3. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Herrington v. State
neutral
2 sentences1998Herrington, supra. Accordingly, in light of the evidence, we conclude that the traffic stop was not improper and thus the trial court did not err in denying Roberson’s motion to suppress. 1998Dooley, supra; Herrington, supra. Judgment affirmed. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Dooley v. State
green
1 sentence1998Dooley, supra; Herrington, supra. Judgment affirmed. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.