56 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Nucciogreen2 sentences2009In State v. Nuccio, 454 So.2d 93, 104 (La. 1984), called into doubt on other grounds by State v. Johnson, 94, p. 15 (La.11/27/95), 664 So.2d 94, 101 , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that while a colloquy between the judge and defendant is the preferred method of proving a free and voluntary waiver of constitutional rights, the colloquy is not indispensable when the record contains some other affirmative showing of the waiver. *1142 Moreover, contrary to the defendant’s assertion that the plea was invalid because the trial judge failed to explain he could ask for a judge trial, the Louisiana 1989“While a colloquy between the judge and defendant is the preferred method of proof of a free and voluntary waiver, the colloquy is not indispensible when the record contains some other affirmative showing of proper waiver.” State v. Nuccio, 454 So.2d 93, 104 (La.1984). | 9 | 15 |
State v. Banksgreen1 sentence2009State v. Banks, 412 So.2d 1025, 1027 (La.1982). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Carsongreen1 sentence2007State v. Carson, 527 So.2d 1018, 1020 (La.App. 1 Cir.1988). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Arnoldgreen1 sentence1999State v. Morrison, supra; State v. Nabors, supra; State v. Age, supra; State v. Brew, supra; See also State v. Arnold, 30,282 (La.App.2d Cir.1/21/98), 706 So.2d 578 (finding that a defendant who had specifically waived his right to a jury trial on his murder charges did not also waive his right to a jury trial on his firearm charge pursuant to an amended indictment). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Morrison
green
2 sentences2015State v. Myers, 43,-105 (La.App.2d Cir.3/19/08), 978 So.2d 595 ; State v. Morrison, 599 So.2d 455 (La.App. 2d Cir.1992). 2006Indeed, an express and knowing waiver of those rights must appear on the record, and an unequivocal showing of a free and voluntary waiver cannot be presumed. *516 Boykin, supra; State v. Morrison, 599 So.2d 455 (La.App. 2d Cir.1992). | 16 | 1999–2015 |
State v. English
green
2 sentences2007State v. Durr, 28,197 (La.App.2d Cir.6/26/96), 677 So.2d 596 ; State v. English, 582 So.2d 1358 (La.App. 2d Cir.1991), writ denied, 584 So.2d 1172 (La.1991). 2006State v. Durr, 28,197 (La.App. 2d Cir.6/26/96), 677 So.2d 596 ; State v. English, 582 So.2d 1358 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1991), writ denied, 584 So.2d 1172 (La. 1991). | 7 | 1999–2007 |
State v. Durr
green
2 sentences2007State v. Durr, 28,197 (La.App.2d Cir.6/26/96), 677 So.2d 596 ; State v. English, 582 So.2d 1358 (La.App. 2d Cir.1991), writ denied, 584 So.2d 1172 (La.1991). 2006State v. Durr, 28,197 (La.App. 2d Cir.6/26/96), 677 So.2d 596 ; State v. English, 582 So.2d 1358 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1991), writ denied, 584 So.2d 1172 (La. 1991). | 7 | 1999–2007 |
Boykin v. Alabama
green
2 sentences2025Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S. Ct. 1709 , 23 L. 2025Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S. Ct. 1709 , 23 L. | 6 | 1987–2025 |
State v. English
green
2 sentences2007State v. Durr, 28,197 (La.App.2d Cir.6/26/96), 677 So.2d 596 ; State v. English, 582 So.2d 1358 (La.App. 2d Cir.1991), writ denied, 584 So.2d 1172 (La.1991). 2006State v. Durr, 28,197 (La.App. 2d Cir.6/26/96), 677 So.2d 596 ; State v. English, 582 So.2d 1358 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1991), writ denied, 584 So.2d 1172 (La. 1991). | 6 | 2001–2007 |
State v. Cooper
green
2 sentences2019App. 2 Cir. 11/08/18), 261 So.3d 975 ; State v. Martin, supra. An express and knowing waiver of those rights must appear on the record, and an unequivocal showing of a free and voluntary waiver cannot be presumed. 2019App. 2 Cir. 11/08/18), 261 So.3d 975 ; State v. Martin, supra. An express and knowing waiver of those rights must appear on the record, and an unequivocal showing of a free and voluntary waiver cannot be presumed. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Minniefield
green
2 sentences2011State v. Minniefield, 43,300, p. 3 (La.App. 2 Cir. 6/4/08), 986 So.2d 227, 230 . 2009State v. Minniefield, 43,300, p. 3 (La.App. 2 Cir. 6/4/08), 986 So.2d 227, 230 . | 2 | 2009–2011 |
Holloway v. United States
green
2 sentences2009LSA-R.S. 15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 26 (La.4/13/99), 755 So.2d 845, 855 , cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1023 , 120 S.Ct. 1429 , 146 L.Ed.2d 319 (2000). 2009LSA-R.S. 15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 26 (La.4/13/99), 755 So.2d 845, 855 , cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1023 , 120 S.Ct. 1429 , 146 L.Ed.2d 319 (2000). | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Woods v. California
green
2 sentences2009LSA-R.S. 15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 26 (La.4/13/99), 755 So.2d 845, 855 , cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1023 , 120 S.Ct. 1429 , 146 L.Ed.2d 319 (2000). 2009LSA-R.S. 15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 26 (La.4/13/99), 755 So.2d 845, 855 , cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1023 , 120 S.Ct. 1429 , 146 L.Ed.2d 319 (2000). | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Lane v. National Data Corp.
green
2 sentences2009LSA-R.S. 15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 26 (La.4/13/99), 755 So.2d 845, 855 , cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1023 , 120 S.Ct. 1429 , 146 L.Ed.2d 319 (2000). 2009LSA-R.S. 15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 26 (La.4/13/99), 755 So.2d 845, 855 , cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1023 , 120 S.Ct. 1429 , 146 L.Ed.2d 319 (2000). | 2 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Lucky
green
2 sentences2009LSA-R.S. 15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 26 (La.4/13/99), 755 So.2d 845, 855 , cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1023 , 120 S.Ct. 1429 , 146 L.Ed.2d 319 (2000). 2009LSA-R.S. 15:451; State v. Lucky, 96-1687, p. 26 (La.4/13/99), 755 So.2d 845, 855 , cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1023 , 120 S.Ct. 1429 , 146 L.Ed.2d 319 (2000). | 2 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Terrick
neutral
2 sentences2009Pursuant to the free and voluntary rule set forth in La.R.S. 15:451, before a purported confession can be introduced in evidence, the State must show “[t]hat it |swas free and voluntary, and not made under the influence of fear, duress, intimidation, menaces, threats, inducements or promises.” Also, as noted in State v. Terrick, 03-515, pp. 9-10 (La.App. 5 Cir. 9/30/03), 857 So.2d 1153, 1159 , writ denied, 03-3272 (La.3/26/04), 871 So.2d 346 , Before introducing a defendant’s statement into evidence, the state must show that the statement did not result from fear, duress, intimidation, menace, 2009Pursuant to the free and voluntary rule set forth in La.R.S. 15:451, before a purported confession can be introduced in evidence, the State must show "[t]hat it was free and voluntary, and not made under the influence of fear, duress, intimidation, menaces, threats, inducements or promises." Also, as noted in State v. Terrick, 03-515, pp. 9-10 (La.App. 5 Cir. 9/30/03), 857 So.2d 1153, 1159 , writ denied, 03-3272 (La.3/26/04), 871 So.2d 346 , Before introducing a defendant's statement into evidence, the state must show that the statement did not result from fear, duress, intimidation, menace, t | 2 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Terrick
green
2 sentences2009Pursuant to the free and voluntary rule set forth in La.R.S. 15:451, before a purported confession can be introduced in evidence, the State must show “[t]hat it |swas free and voluntary, and not made under the influence of fear, duress, intimidation, menaces, threats, inducements or promises.” Also, as noted in State v. Terrick, 03-515, pp. 9-10 (La.App. 5 Cir. 9/30/03), 857 So.2d 1153, 1159 , writ denied, 03-3272 (La.3/26/04), 871 So.2d 346 , Before introducing a defendant’s statement into evidence, the state must show that the statement did not result from fear, duress, intimidation, menace, 2009Pursuant to the free and voluntary rule set forth in La.R.S. 15:451, before a purported confession can be introduced in evidence, the State must show "[t]hat it was free and voluntary, and not made under the influence of fear, duress, intimidation, menaces, threats, inducements or promises." Also, as noted in State v. Terrick, 03-515, pp. 9-10 (La.App. 5 Cir. 9/30/03), 857 So.2d 1153, 1159 , writ denied, 03-3272 (La.3/26/04), 871 So.2d 346 , Before introducing a defendant's statement into evidence, the state must show that the statement did not result from fear, duress, intimidation, menace, t | 2 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Keener
green
2 sentences2008Boykin, supra; State v. Keener, 41,246 (La.App. 2d Cir.8/23/06), 939 So.2d 510 ; State v. Morrison, 599 So.2d 455 (La.App. 2d Cir.1992). 2007Boykin, supra; State v. Keener, 41,246 (La.App. 2d Cir.8/23/06), 939 So.2d 510 ; State v. Morrison, 599 So.2d 455 (La.App. 2d Cir.1992). *313 In addition, LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 556.1 provides that prior to accepting a guilty plea, the court must personally inform defendant of the nature of the charge to which the plea is offered, any mandatory minimum penalty and the maximum possible penalty. | 2 | 2007–2008 |
Commonwealth v. Selby
green
2 sentences2016We note that other jurisdictions have held that the use of false information by police during an interrogation is deceptive and a relevant factor indicating a possibility that the defendant’s statements were made involuntarily, Com. v. Monroe, 472 Mass. 461 , 35 N.E.3d 677 (2015); Commonwealth v. Selby, 420 Mass. 656 , 651 N.E.2d 843 (1995). 2016We note that other jurisdictions have held that the use of false information by police during an interrogation is deceptive and a relevant factor indicating a possibility that the defendant’s statements were made involuntarily, Com. v. Monroe, 472 Mass. 461 , 35 N.E.3d 677 (2015); Commonwealth v. Selby, 420 Mass. 656 , 651 N.E.2d 843 (1995). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Commonwealth v. Monroe
green
2 sentences2016We note that other jurisdictions have held that the use of false information by police during an interrogation is deceptive and a relevant factor indicating a possibility that the defendant’s statements were made involuntarily, Com. v. Monroe, 472 Mass. 461 , 35 N.E.3d 677 (2015); Commonwealth v. Selby, 420 Mass. 656 , 651 N.E.2d 843 (1995). 2016We note that other jurisdictions have held that the use of false information by police during an interrogation is deceptive and a relevant factor indicating a possibility that the defendant’s statements were made involuntarily, Com. v. Monroe, 472 Mass. 461 , 35 N.E.3d 677 (2015); Commonwealth v. Selby, 420 Mass. 656 , 651 N.E.2d 843 (1995). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Myers
neutral
1 sentence2015State v. Myers, 43,-105 (La.App.2d Cir.3/19/08), 978 So.2d 595 ; State v. Morrison, 599 So.2d 455 (La.App. 2d Cir.1992). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Lee
green
1 sentence2012State v. Lee, supra; State v. Shipp, supra. Given the consistency of the state’s evidence at the hearing on the motion to suppress, the trial and the free-and-voluntary hearing, admitting the disciplinary report did not unduly prejudice Hardy. 2 This assignment lacks merit. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Johnson
green
1 sentence2009In State v. Nuccio, 454 So.2d 93, 104 (La. 1984), called into doubt on other grounds by State v. Johnson, 94, p. 15 (La.11/27/95), 664 So.2d 94, 101 , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that while a colloquy between the judge and defendant is the preferred method of proving a free and voluntary waiver of constitutional rights, the colloquy is not indispensable when the record contains some other affirmative showing of the waiver. *1142 Moreover, contrary to the defendant’s assertion that the plea was invalid because the trial judge failed to explain he could ask for a judge trial, the Louisiana | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Hicks
neutral
1 sentence2008State v. Kennedy, supra ; State v. Hicks, 42,427 (La.App. 2d Cir.10/24/07), 968 So.2d 307 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Vu
neutral
1 sentence2005Id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Longo
green
1 sentence2000Longo, 560 So.2d at 532 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Brew
green
1 sentence1999State v. Morrison, supra; State v. Nabors, supra; State v. Age, supra; State v. Brew, supra; See also State v. Arnold, 30,282 (La.App.2d Cir.1/21/98), 706 So.2d 578 (finding that a defendant who had specifically waived his right to a jury trial on his murder charges did not also waive his right to a jury trial on his firearm charge pursuant to an amended indictment). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Nabors
neutral
2 sentences1999Id.; State v. Morrison, 599 So.2d 455 (La.App. 2d Cir.1992); State v. Age, 417 So.2d 1183 (La.1981); State v. Nabors, 569 So.2d 255 (La.App. 2d Cir.1990). 1999State v. Morrison, supra; State v. Nabors, supra; State v. Age, supra; State v. Brew, supra; See also State v. Arnold, 30,282 (La.App.2d Cir.1/21/98), 706 So.2d 578 (finding that a defendant who had specifically waived his right to a jury trial on his murder charges did not also waive his right to a jury trial on his firearm charge pursuant to an amended indictment). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Age
green
2 sentences1999State v. Morrison, supra; State v. Nabors, supra; State v. Age, supra; State v. Brew, supra; See also State v. Arnold, 30,282 (La.App.2d Cir.1/21/98), 706 So.2d 578 (finding that a defendant who had specifically waived his right to a jury trial on his murder charges did not also waive his right to a jury trial on his firearm charge pursuant to an amended indictment). 1999Id.; State v. Morrison, 599 So.2d 455 (La.App. 2d Cir.1992); State v. Age, 417 So.2d 1183 (La.1981); State v. Nabors, 569 So.2d 255 (La.App. 2d Cir.1990). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Smith
green
1 sentence1992Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Nuccio, 454 So.2d 93 (La.1984); State v. Smith, 513 So.2d 544 (La.App.2d Cir.1987). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| State v. Simmons green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| State v. Lambert green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| State v. Benoit green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| State v. West green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| State v. Lewis green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| State v. Halsell green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.