7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1942–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Chicago v. Old Colony Partners, L.P.
green
2 sentences2009Old Colony, 364 Ill. 2009Old Colony, 364 Ill. | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Hill v. Butler
green
1 sentence2021Id. ¶ 46 The Board argues that Landmarks is distinguishable because, in Landmarks, the building at issue was at one time included in the National Register of Historic Places, whereas, in this case, there is no allegation in the complaint that the National Trust has deemed the courthouse to be of national historic significance. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Landmarks Preservation Council v. City of Chicago
green
1 sentence2020Id. 19 ¶ 46 The Board argues that Landmarks is distinguishable because, in Landmarks, the building at issue was at one time included in the National Register of Historic Places, whereas, in this case, there is no allegation in the complaint that the National Trust has deemed the courthouse to be of national historic significance. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Greer v. Illinois Housing Development Authority
green
1 sentence1991(Greer, 150 Ill. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Greer v. Illinois Housing Development Authority
green
1 sentence1991In any case, the trial court on remand will be free to fashion appropriate relief.” (Greer, 122 Ill. 2d at 517 .) (Emphasis added.) It appeared to us that, if the Building was not in violation on November 24, 1986, the Intervenors’ claim that they should be credited for disclosing (and correcting) a building violation through their Greer activities was invalid. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. First Arlington National Bank
green
2 sentences1984App. 3d 401, 410 , 454 N.E.2d 723 .) In the case at bar, the trial court specifically found defendant knew the building was in violation of the building code and failed to disclose this to the plaintiff. 1984The trial court’s findings of fact in this regard will not be disregarded unless they are against the manifest weight of the evidence. 118 Ill. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Bairstow v. Northwestern University
neutral
1 sentence1942Bairstow v. Northwestern University, 287 Ill. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.