7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Woodgreen2 sentences2021People v. Wood, 379 Ill. 2020People v. Wood, 379 Ill. | 3 | 3 |
People v. Crockergreen2 sentences2008People v. Crocker, 267 Ill. 2008People v. Crocker, 267 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Richardsongreen1 sentence2024In a rescission hearing, “the motorist may challenge the propriety of the traffic stop leading to his or her DUI arrest.” (Emphasis added.) People v. Araiza, 2020 IL App (3d) 170735, ¶ 15 . ¶ 26 The Illinois Supreme Court has given the following guidance on the constitutionality of traffic stops: “Vehicle stops are subject to the fourth amendment’s reasonableness requirement. [Citations.] As a general matter, the decision to stop an automobile is reasonable where the police have probable cause to believe that a traffic violation has occurred. [Citation.] However, as this court has observed, th | 1 | 1 |
People v. Leegreen1 sentence2024App. 3d 612, 617 (2007) (quoting People v. Lee, 214 Ill. 2d 476, 487 (2005))). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Araiza
green
1 sentence2024In a rescission hearing, “the motorist may challenge the propriety of the traffic stop leading to his or her DUI arrest.” (Emphasis added.) People v. Araiza, 2020 IL App (3d) 170735, ¶ 15 . ¶ 26 The Illinois Supreme Court has given the following guidance on the constitutionality of traffic stops: “Vehicle stops are subject to the fourth amendment’s reasonableness requirement. [Citations.] As a general matter, the decision to stop an automobile is reasonable where the police have probable cause to believe that a traffic violation has occurred. [Citation.] However, as this court has observed, th | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Hackett
green
1 sentence2024In a rescission hearing, “the motorist may challenge the propriety of the traffic stop leading to his or her DUI arrest.” (Emphasis added.) People v. Araiza, 2020 IL App (3d) 170735, ¶ 15 . ¶ 26 The Illinois Supreme Court has given the following guidance on the constitutionality of traffic stops: “Vehicle stops are subject to the fourth amendment’s reasonableness requirement. [Citations.] As a general matter, the decision to stop an automobile is reasonable where the police have probable cause to believe that a traffic violation has occurred. [Citation.] However, as this court has observed, th | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Faletti
green
1 sentence1993App. 3d 61, 63 , 573 N.E.2d 867, 869 , where this court held that, in order to justify an investigatory stop of an automobile, an officer must have an articulable and reasonable suspicion that the motorist is in violation of the law. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.