7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
King v. First Capital Financial Services Corp.green2 sentences2017The doctrine of in pari delicto embodies the principle that “ ‘a plaintiff who has participated in wrongdoing may not recover damages resulting from the wrongdoing.’ ” Id. (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 806 (8th ed. 2004)). ¶ 11 In arguing that the receiver is barred from bringing her claims pursuant to the doctrine of in pari delicto, Shapiro directs us to many cases from the federal courts and other state courts. 2017The doctrine of in pari delicto embodies the principle that “ ‘a plaintiff who has participated in wrongdoing may not recover damages resulting from the wrongdoing.’ ” Id. (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 806 (8th ed. 2004)). ¶ 11 In arguing that the receiver is barred from bringing her claims pursuant to the doctrine of in pari delicto, Shapiro directs us to many cases from the federal courts and other state courts. | 4 | 7 |
Vine Street Clinic v. HealthLink, Inc.green2 sentences2008See Hedlund & Hanley, LLC v. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 508, 376 Ill.App.3d 200, 207 , 315 Ill.Dec. 1 , 876 N.E.2d 1 (2007) (when a contract exists between the parties, no quasi-contractual claim, such as quantum meruit can arise). "`[T]he law will not aid either party to an illegal act, but will leave them without remedy as against each other,' with the caveat that they are of equal knowledge, wilfulness and wrongful intent, *760 or in pari delicto. [Citation; see also King v. First Capital Financial Services Corp., 215 Ill.2d 1, 33-34 , 293 Ill.Dec. 657 , 828 N.E.2d 2008See Hedlund & Hanley, LLC v. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 508, 376 Ill.App.3d 200, 207 , 315 Ill.Dec. 1 , 876 N.E.2d 1 (2007) (when a contract exists between the parties, no quasi-contractual claim, such as quantum meruit can arise). "`[T]he law will not aid either party to an illegal act, but will leave them without remedy as against each other,' with the caveat that they are of equal knowledge, wilfulness and wrongful intent, *760 or in pari delicto. [Citation; see also King v. First Capital Financial Services Corp., 215 Ill.2d 1, 33-34 , 293 Ill.Dec. 657 , 828 N.E.2d | 2 | 2 |
Hedlund & Hanley, LLC v. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 508green2 sentences2008See Hedlund & Hanley, LLC v. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 508, 376 Ill.App.3d 200, 207 , 315 Ill.Dec. 1 , 876 N.E.2d 1 (2007) (when a contract exists between the parties, no quasi-contractual claim, such as quantum meruit can arise). "`[T]he law will not aid either party to an illegal act, but will leave them without remedy as against each other,' with the caveat that they are of equal knowledge, wilfulness and wrongful intent, *760 or in pari delicto. [Citation; see also King v. First Capital Financial Services Corp., 215 Ill.2d 1, 33-34 , 293 Ill.Dec. 657 , 828 N.E.2d 2008See Hedlund & Hanley, LLC v. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 508, 376 Ill.App.3d 200, 207 , 315 Ill.Dec. 1 , 876 N.E.2d 1 (2007) (when a contract exists between the parties, no quasi-contractual claim, such as quantum meruit can arise). "`[T]he law will not aid either party to an illegal act, but will leave them without remedy as against each other,' with the caveat that they are of equal knowledge, wilfulness and wrongful intent, *760 or in pari delicto. [Citation; see also King v. First Capital Financial Services Corp., 215 Ill.2d 1, 33-34 , 293 Ill.Dec. 657 , 828 N.E.2d | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Practice Management, Ltd. v. Schwartz
green
2 sentences2008Where this court has found that the percentage-based fee agreement between plaintiff and defendants violated the broad prohibition against fee sharing set forth in section 22(A)(14), the proper course is for the parties to be left “ ‘where they have placed themselves.’ ” Vine Street, 222 Ill. 2d at 299 , quoting Practice Management, 256 Ill. 2008Where this court has found that the percentage-based fee agreement between plaintiff and defendants violated the broad prohibition against fee sharing set forth in section 22(A)(14), the proper course is for the parties to be left "`where they have placed themselves.'" Vine Street, 222 Ill.2d at 299 , 305 Ill.Dec. 617 , 856 N.E.2d 422 , quoting Practice Management, 256 Ill. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.