7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Miguel Vasquez v. Michael Parrottgreen1 sentence2014See Vasquez, 318 F.3d at 392 n.1. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Apprendi v. New Jersey
green
2 sentences2003On appeal, the defendant contends that we must vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing because: (1) the trial court improperly relied upon his prior armed violence conviction to enhance the offense of unlawful use of a weapon by a felon from a Class 3 felony to a Class 2 felony; (2) the sentence was imposed in violation of his constitutional rights pursuant to the rule announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 147 L. 2003On appeal, the defendant contends that we must vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing because: (1) the trial court improperly relied upon his prior armed violence conviction to enhance the offense of unlawful use of a weapon by a felon from a Class 3 felony to a Class 2 felony; (2) the sentence was imposed in violation of his constitutional rights pursuant to the rule announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 147 L. | 4 | 2003–2003 |
People v. Jordan
green
2 sentences1999For the reasons stated above, we have reversed that conviction and vacated the sentence and, thus, we need not further consider this issue except to agree with the parties that under People v. Jordan, 103 Ill. 2d 192 (1984), an extended-term sentence was inappropriate. 1999For the reasons stated above, we have reversed that conviction and vacated the sentence and, thus, we need not further consider this issue except to agree with the parties that under People v. Jordan, 103 Ill. 2d 192 (1984), an extended-term sentence was inappropriate. | 2 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.