7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Joe W. Fountain (92-1507) Carlton B. McEaddy (92-1866)green2 sentences2005See also Bohannon , 225 F.3d at 616-17 (explaining that many of the rationales underlying Summers , the prevention of flight if incriminating evidence was found and the minimization of risk of harm to the officers, were also present in the detention of nonresidents); Fountain , 2 F.3d at 662-64 (applying the Summers analysis in holding that Summers includes nonresidents of the searched premises). 2005See also Bohannon , 225 F.3d at 616-17 (explaining that many of the rationales underlying Summers , the prevention of flight if incriminating evidence was found and the minimization of risk of harm to the officers, were also present in the detention of nonresidents); Fountain , 2 F.3d at 662-64 (applying the Summers analysis in holding that Summers includes nonresidents of the searched premises). | 2 | 2 |
United States v. James M. Bohannongreen2 sentences2005See also Bohannon , 225 F.3d at 616-17 (explaining that many of the rationales underlying Summers , the prevention of flight if incriminating evidence was found and the minimization of risk of harm to the officers, were also present in the detention of nonresidents); Fountain , 2 F.3d at 662-64 (applying the Summers analysis in holding that Summers includes nonresidents of the searched premises). 2005See also Bohannon , 225 F.3d at 616-17 (explaining that many of the rationales underlying Summers , the prevention of flight if incriminating evidence was found and the minimization of risk of harm to the officers, were also present in the detention of nonresidents); Fountain , 2 F.3d at 662-64 (applying the Summers analysis in holding that Summers includes nonresidents of the searched premises). | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Baileygreen2 sentences2012Instead, we hold today that Summers authorizes law enforcement to detain the occupant of premises subject to a valid search warrant when that person is seen leaving those premises and the detention is effected as soon as reasonably practicable.” (Emphasis in original.) United States v. Bailey, 652 F.3d 197, 208 (2d Cir. 2011). 2012Instead, we hold today that Summers authorizes law enforcement to detain the occupant of premises subject to a valid search warrant when that person is seen leaving those premises and the detention is effected as soon as reasonably practicable.” (Emphasis in original.) United States v. Bailey, 652 F.3d 197, 208 (2d Cir. 2011). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Whitegreen2 sentences2011Supra ¶ 27, 352 Ill.Dec. at 165-66, 953 N.E.2d at 404-05. ¶ 40 People v. Keller, 353 Ill.App.3d 830 , 289 Ill.Dec. 405 , 819 N.E.2d 1205 (2004), is more illuminating. 2011Supra ¶ 27, 352 Ill.Dec. at 165-66, 953 N.E.2d at 404-05. ¶ 40 People v. Keller, 353 Ill.App.3d 830 , 289 Ill.Dec. 405 , 819 N.E.2d 1205 (2004), is more illuminating. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Keller
green
2 sentences2011Supra ¶ 27, 352 Ill.Dec. at 165-66, 953 N.E.2d at 404-05. ¶ 40 People v. Keller, 353 Ill.App.3d 830 , 289 Ill.Dec. 405 , 819 N.E.2d 1205 (2004), is more illuminating. 2011Supra ¶ 27, 352 Ill.Dec. at 165-66, 953 N.E.2d at 404-05. ¶ 40 People v. Keller, 353 Ill.App.3d 830 , 289 Ill.Dec. 405 , 819 N.E.2d 1205 (2004), is more illuminating. | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories
green
2 sentences1988The Restatement comments that modification of the Summers rule may be necessary in a situation like that before us ***.” 12 26 Cal. 3d at 610 , 607 P.2d at 936 , 163 Cal. Rptr. at 144 . 1988The Restatement comments that modification of the Summers rule may be necessary in a situation like that before us ***.” 12 26 Cal. 3d at 610 , 607 P.2d at 936 , 163 Cal. Rptr. at 144 . | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Summers v. Tice
green
2 sentences1988Summers v. Tice (1948), 33 Cal. 2d 80, 86-88 , 199 P.2d 1 . 4-5. 12 The Summers rule has generally been limited to eases where all of the potential wrongdoers were joined as defendants and where the wrongdoers’ actions occurred simultaneously and created substantially the same risk. 1988Summers v. Tice (1948), 33 Cal. 2d 80, 86-88 , 199 P.2d 1 . 4-5. 12 The Summers rule has generally been limited to eases where all of the potential wrongdoers were joined as defendants and where the wrongdoers’ actions occurred simultaneously and created substantially the same risk. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
People v. Bailey
green
1 sentence1986(See People v. Bailey (1985), 132 Ill. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
David v. United States
green
1 sentence1986Ed. 2d 136 , 91 S. Ct. 1657 ), and there is no proof here that Summers’ plea was coerced in order to dissuade him from testifying on defendant’s behalf. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.