7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1897–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Holcombgreen1 sentence2023See People v. Holcomb, 2022 IL App (3d) 210038, ¶ 16 ; see also cf. 730 ILCS 5/5-6-4(a)(1)-(3) (West 2022) (when a defendant has violated probation, the State must notify defendant of the violation, provide a summons for a hearing, and order a warrant for defendant’s arrest, which “shall toll the period of probation”); see cf. 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-30(d), 5- 4.5-35, 5-4.5-40, 5-4.5-45 (West 2022) (no period of probation shall exceed four years for probationable offenses). | 1 | 1 |
In re Marriage of Naugreen1 sentence2009See In re Marriage of Nau, 355 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Ultsch v. Illinois Municipal Retirement Fundgreen2 sentences2007NOTES [1] Public Act 89-685 also inserted a corresponding exception in the summons requirement of section 3-105 (735 ILCS 5/3-105 (West 2004)). [2] The dissent accepts this argument. 226 Ill.2d at 194-99 , 314 Ill.Dec. at 105-109 , 874 N.E.2d at 15-19 (Kilbride, J., dissenting, joined by Karmeier, J.). 2007NOTES [1] Public Act 89-685 also inserted a corresponding exception in the summons requirement of section 3-105 (735 ILCS 5/3-105 (West 2004)). [2] The dissent accepts this argument. 226 Ill.2d at 194-99 , 314 Ill.Dec. at 105-109 , 874 N.E.2d at 15-19 (Kilbride, J., dissenting, joined by Karmeier, J.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nelson v. Keene Corp.
neutral
2 sentences2004Nelson v. Keene Corp., 283 Ill.App.3d 7, 10-11 , 218 Ill.Dec. 522 , 669 N.E.2d 665 (1996) (interpreting section 2-201(1) of the Civil Practice Law which says, "Every action, unless otherwise expressly provided by statute, shall be commenced by the filing of the complaint. 2004Nelson v. Keene Corp., 283 Ill.App.3d 7, 10-11 , 218 Ill.Dec. 522 , 669 N.E.2d 665 (1996) (interpreting section 2-201(1) of the Civil Practice Law which says, "Every action, unless otherwise expressly provided by statute, shall be commenced by the filing of the complaint. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Lockett v. Chicago Police Board
green
2 sentences1992(Lockett, 133 Ill. 2d at 354-55 .) The summons requirement of section 3 — 105 is mandatory but not jurisdictional. 1992(Lockett, 133 Ill. 2d at 355 .) Even here, however, the strict nature of the Act requires a plaintiff who does not meet the time limit to show that he had made a “good-faith effort to issue summons within the statutory period.” (Lockett, 133 Ill. 2d at 355 .) The court’s reason for this concession was that the failure to file summons within the 35-day period may be the result of circumstances beyond the control of an otherwise diligent plaintiff. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Minard
neutral
1 sentence1897Co. v. Minard et al., 20 Ill. 9 , in which it says: “ We think we are judicially informed, of the contents of the summons and of the claim indorsed upon it, and that the judgment of the Circuit Court was for more than the amount of such claim and interest, which was erroneous.” See also T., P. & W. | 1 | 1897–1897 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.