consideration of any mitigating factors (Maryland) · Go Syfert
← Maryland issues

consideration of any mitigating factors in Maryland

7 Maryland opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Reinhardtgreen
md · 2006 · cited in 6 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2006–2013
2 sentences

2013In determining the appropriate sanction for attorney misconduct, we consider “the facts and circumstances of each case, including a consideration of any mitigating factors.” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Reinhardt, 391 Md. 209, 223 , 892 A.2d 533, 541 (2006) (citing Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Zuckerman, 386 Md. 341, 375 , 872 A.2d 693, 713 (2005)).

2013In determining the appropriate sanction for attorney misconduct, we consider “the facts and circumstances of each case, including a consideration of any mitigating factors.” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Reinhardt, 391 Md. 209, 223 , 892 A.2d 533, 541 (2006) (citing Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Zuckerman, 386 Md. 341, 375 , 872 A.2d 693, 713 (2005)).

56
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Zuckermangreen
md · 2005 · cited in 6 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2006–2013
2 sentences

2013In determining the appropriate sanction for attorney misconduct, we consider “the facts and circumstances of each case, including a consideration of any mitigating factors.” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Reinhardt, 391 Md. 209, 223 , 892 A.2d 533, 541 (2006) (citing Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Zuckerman, 386 Md. 341, 375 , 872 A.2d 693, 713 (2005)).

2013In determining the appropriate sanction for attorney misconduct, we consider “the facts and circumstances of each case, including a consideration of any mitigating factors.” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Reinhardt, 391 Md. 209, 223 , 892 A.2d 533, 541 (2006) (citing Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Zuckerman, 386 Md. 341, 375 , 872 A.2d 693, 713 (2005)).

46
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. Atkinsongreen
md · 2000 · cited in 2 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2006–2007
2 sentences

2007“The sanction for a violation of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct depends on the facts and circumstances of each case, including a consideration of any mitigating factors.” Reinhardt, 391 Md. at 223 , 892 A.2d at 541 (citing Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Zuckerman, 386 Md. 341, 375 , 872 A.2d 693, 713 (2005)); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Atkinson, 357 Md. 646, 656 , 745 A.2d 1086, 1092 (2000) (“In addition to the facts underlying the misconduct, the attorney’s prior grievance history, as well as any mitigating factors are part of the equation.”).

2007“The sanction for a violation of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct depends on the facts and circumstances of each case, including a consideration of any mitigating factors.” Reinhardt, 391 Md. at 223 , 892 A.2d at 541 (citing Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Zuckerman, 386 Md. 341, 375 , 872 A.2d 693, 713 (2005)); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Atkinson, 357 Md. 646, 656 , 745 A.2d 1086, 1092 (2000) (“In addition to the facts underlying the misconduct, the attorney’s prior grievance history, as well as any mitigating factors are part of the equation.”).

22
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kepplegreen
md · 2013 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013“In determining the appropriate sanction for attorney misconduct, we consider ‘the facts and circumstances of each case, including a consideration of any mitigating factors.’ ” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Kepple, 432 Md. 214, 230 , 68 A.3d 797, 806 (2013) (per curiam) (quoting Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Reinhardt, 391 Md. 209, 223 , 892 A.2d 533, 541 (2006)).

2013“In determining the appropriate sanction for attorney misconduct, we consider ‘the facts and circumstances of each case, including a consideration of any mitigating factors.’ ” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Kepple, 432 Md. 214, 230 , 68 A.3d 797, 806 (2013) (per curiam) (quoting Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Reinhardt, 391 Md. 209, 223 , 892 A.2d 533, 541 (2006)).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check