threefold test (Maryland) · Go Syfert
← Maryland issues

threefold test in Maryland

7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2021 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Washington Home Remodelers, Inc. v. Stategreen
md · 2012 · cited in 2 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
2 sentences

2021Div., 426 Md. 613, 623 (2012) (citation and quotations omitted).

2021Div., 426 Md. 613, 623 (2012) (citation and quotations omitted).

22
D'AOUST v. Diamondgreen
md · 2012 · cited in 2 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
2 sentences

2021“In conducting our review of a grant of a motion for summary judgment, we consider only the grounds upon which the trial court relied in granting summary judgment.” D’Aoust v. Diamond, 424 Md. 549, 575 (2012) (internal citations and quotations omitted). 4 To determine the validity of an investigatory subpoena issued by an administrative agency, the following threefold test is applied: “[w]hether the inquiry is authorized by statute, the information sought is relevant to the inquiry, and the demand is not too indefinite or overbroad.” Washington Home Remodelers, Inc. v. State, Off. of Att’y Gen

2021“In conducting our review of a grant of a motion for summary judgment, we consider only the grounds upon which the trial court relied in granting summary judgment.” D’Aoust v. Diamond, 424 Md. 549, 575 (2012) (internal citations and quotations omitted). 4 To determine the validity of an investigatory subpoena issued by an administrative agency, the following threefold test is applied: “[w]hether the inquiry is authorized by statute, the information sought is relevant to the inquiry, and the demand is not too indefinite or overbroad.” Washington Home Remodelers, Inc. v. State, Off. of Att’y Gen

22
Banach v. State Commission on Human Relationsgreen
md · 1976 · cited in 3 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1980–2008
2 sentences

2008Comm’n on Human Relations, 277 Md. 502, 506 , 356 A.2d 242 (1976) (defining a threefold test for determining the validity of a subpoena issued by an administrative agency; the first step being that the inquiry is authorized by statute); see also State of Md.

2008Comm’n on Human Relations, 277 Md. 502, 506 , 356 A.2d 242 (1976) (defining a threefold test for determining the validity of a subpoena issued by an administrative agency; the first step being that the inquiry is authorized by statute); see also State of Md.

13

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Ramsay, Scarlett & Co. v. Comptroller of Treasury green
md · 1985
2 sentences

1993In that case we relied on the Court of Appeals’ ruling in Ramsay, Scarlett & Co. v. Comptroller of the Treasury, 302 Md. 825 , 490 A2d 1296 (1985), to set forth the following threefold analysis for the guidance of reviewing courts: 1.

1993In that case we relied on the Court of Appeals’ ruling in Ramsay, Scarlett & Co. v. Comptroller of the Treasury, 302 Md. 825 , 490 A2d 1296 (1985), to set forth the following threefold analysis for the guidance of reviewing courts: 1.

11993–1993
Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. Walling green
scotus · 1946
2 sentences

1976Co. v. Walling, 327 U.S. 186, 208 , 66 S.Ct. 494 , 90 L.Ed. 614 (1946), the Supreme Court articulated a threefold test for determining the validity of a subpoena issued by an administrative agency: Whether the inquiry is authorized by statute, the information sought is relevant to the inquiry, and the demand is not too indefinite or overbroad.

1976Co. v. Walling, 327 U.S. 186, 208 , 66 S.Ct. 494 , 90 L.Ed. 614 (1946), the Supreme Court articulated a threefold test for determining the validity of a subpoena issued by an administrative agency: Whether the inquiry is authorized by statute, the information sought is relevant to the inquiry, and the demand is not too indefinite or overbroad.

11976–1976

Where else courts name it

PA 20 (1975–2017) FL 11 (1970–2024) NY 9 (1969–1987) MD 7 (1976–2021) IL 4 (1895–2019) AR 3 (1981–1996) WA 3 (1978–1992) MO 3 (1972–2023) NE 2 (1985–1985) IN 2 (1972–1980) DC 2 (1979–1982) MA 2 (1996–2003) CT 2 (1992–2001) NC 2 (1949–1979)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check