7 Maine opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2001 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maine courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Comeau v. Maine Coastal Servicesgreen2 sentences2001Our review of a hearing officer’s application of the Comeau factors, however, is highly deferential. 2 As we stated in Comeau , the hearing officer need not reach the “correct” conclusion, but only a conclusion that is “neither arbitrary nor without rational foundation.” Comeau, 449 A.2d at 368 . [¶ 13] The hearing officer rationally concluded that, in the unique facts of the present case, the necessity of driving the company vehicle at the request of Coastal Products to first perform a business errand, and then to complete a personal errand resulted in a single trip rather than two trips as C 2001Our review of a hearing officer’s application of the Comeau factors, however, is highly deferential. 2 As we stated in Comeau , the hearing officer need not reach the “correct” conclusion, but only a conclusion that is “neither arbitrary nor without rational foundation.” Comeau, 449 A.2d at 368 . [¶ 13] The hearing officer rationally concluded that, in the unique facts of the present case, the necessity of driving the company vehicle at the request of Coastal Products to first perform a business errand, and then to complete a personal errand resulted in a single trip rather than two trips as C | 4 | 4 |
Moreau v. Zayre Corp.green2 sentences2001See, e.g., Moreau v. Zayre Corp., 408 A.2d 1289, 1293 (Me.1979). 2001See, e.g., Moreau v. Zayre Corp., 408 A.2d 1289, 1293 (Me.1979). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maine. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cagle v. Gladden-Driggers Co.
neutral
2 sentences2001Comm'n, 72 Ariz. 197 , 232 P.2d 846 (1951); Cagle v. Gladden-Driggers Co., 222 Ark. 517 , 261 S.W.2d 536 (1953); Harding v. City of Texarkana, 62 Ark.App. 137 , 970 S.W.2d 303 (1998); Boulevard Manor Nursing Home v. Lacombe, 557 So.2d 945 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990); Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982); Lockwood v. Bd. of Trustees, Speedway Methodist Church, 144 Ind.App. 430 , 246 N.E.2d 774 (1969); Danos v. Great Acceptance Corp., 261 So.2d 339 (La.Ct.App.1972); Belyea's Case, 355 Mass. 721 , 247 N.E.2d 372 (1969); Townsend v. Nelson, 308 Minn. 374 , 24 2001Comm'n, 72 Ariz. 197 , 232 P.2d 846 (1951); Cagle v. Gladden-Driggers Co., 222 Ark. 517 , 261 S.W.2d 536 (1953); Harding v. City of Texarkana, 62 Ark.App. 137 , 970 S.W.2d 303 (1998); Boulevard Manor Nursing Home v. Lacombe, 557 So.2d 945 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990); Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982); Lockwood v. Bd. of Trustees, Speedway Methodist Church, 144 Ind.App. 430 , 246 N.E.2d 774 (1969); Danos v. Great Acceptance Corp., 261 So.2d 339 (La.Ct.App.1972); Belyea's Case, 355 Mass. 721 , 247 N.E.2d 372 (1969); Townsend v. Nelson, 308 Minn. 374 , 24 | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Harding v. City of Texarkana
green
2 sentences2001Comm'n, 72 Ariz. 197 , 232 P.2d 846 (1951); Cagle v. Gladden-Driggers Co., 222 Ark. 517 , 261 S.W.2d 536 (1953); Harding v. City of Texarkana, 62 Ark.App. 137 , 970 S.W.2d 303 (1998); Boulevard Manor Nursing Home v. Lacombe, 557 So.2d 945 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990); Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982); Lockwood v. Bd. of Trustees, Speedway Methodist Church, 144 Ind.App. 430 , 246 N.E.2d 774 (1969); Danos v. Great Acceptance Corp., 261 So.2d 339 (La.Ct.App.1972); Belyea's Case, 355 Mass. 721 , 247 N.E.2d 372 (1969); Townsend v. Nelson, 308 Minn. 374 , 24 2001Comm'n, 72 Ariz. 197 , 232 P.2d 846 (1951); Cagle v. Gladden-Driggers Co., 222 Ark. 517 , 261 S.W.2d 536 (1953); Harding v. City of Texarkana, 62 Ark.App. 137 , 970 S.W.2d 303 (1998); Boulevard Manor Nursing Home v. Lacombe, 557 So.2d 945 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990); Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982); Lockwood v. Bd. of Trustees, Speedway Methodist Church, 144 Ind.App. 430 , 246 N.E.2d 774 (1969); Danos v. Great Acceptance Corp., 261 So.2d 339 (La.Ct.App.1972); Belyea's Case, 355 Mass. 721 , 247 N.E.2d 372 (1969); Townsend v. Nelson, 308 Minn. 374 , 24 | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson
green
1 sentence2001Comm'n, 72 Ariz. 197 , 232 P.2d 846 (1951); Cagle v. Gladden-Driggers Co., 222 Ark. 517 , 261 S.W.2d 536 (1953); Harding v. City of Texarkana, 62 Ark.App. 137 , 970 S.W.2d 303 (1998); Boulevard Manor Nursing Home v. Lacombe, 557 So.2d 945 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990); Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982); Lockwood v. Bd. of Trustees, Speedway Methodist Church, 144 Ind.App. 430 , 246 N.E.2d 774 (1969); Danos v. Great Acceptance Corp., 261 So.2d 339 (La.Ct.App.1972); Belyea's Case, 355 Mass. 721 , 247 N.E.2d 372 (1969); Townsend v. Nelson, 308 Minn. 374 , 24 | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Harris v. Industrial Commission
green
2 sentences2001Comm'n, 72 Ariz. 197 , 232 P.2d 846 (1951); Cagle v. Gladden-Driggers Co., 222 Ark. 517 , 261 S.W.2d 536 (1953); Harding v. City of Texarkana, 62 Ark.App. 137 , 970 S.W.2d 303 (1998); Boulevard Manor Nursing Home v. Lacombe, 557 So.2d 945 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990); Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982); Lockwood v. Bd. of Trustees, Speedway Methodist Church, 144 Ind.App. 430 , 246 N.E.2d 774 (1969); Danos v. Great Acceptance Corp., 261 So.2d 339 (La.Ct.App.1972); Belyea's Case, 355 Mass. 721 , 247 N.E.2d 372 (1969); Townsend v. Nelson, 308 Minn. 374 , 24 2001Comm'n, 72 Ariz. 197 , 232 P.2d 846 (1951); Cagle v. Gladden-Driggers Co., 222 Ark. 517 , 261 S.W.2d 536 (1953); Harding v. City of Texarkana, 62 Ark.App. 137 , 970 S.W.2d 303 (1998); Boulevard Manor Nursing Home v. Lacombe, 557 So.2d 945 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990); Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982); Lockwood v. Bd. of Trustees, Speedway Methodist Church, 144 Ind.App. 430 , 246 N.E.2d 774 (1969); Danos v. Great Acceptance Corp., 261 So.2d 339 (La.Ct.App.1972); Belyea's Case, 355 Mass. 721 , 247 N.E.2d 372 (1969); Townsend v. Nelson, 308 Minn. 374 , 24 | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Belyea's Case
green
2 sentences2001Comm'n, 72 Ariz. 197 , 232 P.2d 846 (1951); Cagle v. Gladden-Driggers Co., 222 Ark. 517 , 261 S.W.2d 536 (1953); Harding v. City of Texarkana, 62 Ark.App. 137 , 970 S.W.2d 303 (1998); Boulevard Manor Nursing Home v. Lacombe, 557 So.2d 945 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990); Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982); Lockwood v. Bd. of Trustees, Speedway Methodist Church, 144 Ind.App. 430 , 246 N.E.2d 774 (1969); Danos v. Great Acceptance Corp., 261 So.2d 339 (La.Ct.App.1972); Belyea's Case, 355 Mass. 721 , 247 N.E.2d 372 (1969); Townsend v. Nelson, 308 Minn. 374 , 24 2001Comm'n, 72 Ariz. 197 , 232 P.2d 846 (1951); Cagle v. Gladden-Driggers Co., 222 Ark. 517 , 261 S.W.2d 536 (1953); Harding v. City of Texarkana, 62 Ark.App. 137 , 970 S.W.2d 303 (1998); Boulevard Manor Nursing Home v. Lacombe, 557 So.2d 945 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990); Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982); Lockwood v. Bd. of Trustees, Speedway Methodist Church, 144 Ind.App. 430 , 246 N.E.2d 774 (1969); Danos v. Great Acceptance Corp., 261 So.2d 339 (La.Ct.App.1972); Belyea's Case, 355 Mass. 721 , 247 N.E.2d 372 (1969); Townsend v. Nelson, 308 Minn. 374 , 24 | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Boulevard Manor Nursing Home v. Lacombe
green
1 sentence2001Comm'n, 72 Ariz. 197 , 232 P.2d 846 (1951); Cagle v. Gladden-Driggers Co., 222 Ark. 517 , 261 S.W.2d 536 (1953); Harding v. City of Texarkana, 62 Ark.App. 137 , 970 S.W.2d 303 (1998); Boulevard Manor Nursing Home v. Lacombe, 557 So.2d 945 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990); Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982); Lockwood v. Bd. of Trustees, Speedway Methodist Church, 144 Ind.App. 430 , 246 N.E.2d 774 (1969); Danos v. Great Acceptance Corp., 261 So.2d 339 (La.Ct.App.1972); Belyea's Case, 355 Mass. 721 , 247 N.E.2d 372 (1969); Townsend v. Nelson, 308 Minn. 374 , 24 | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Townsend v. Nelson
green
2 sentences2001Comm'n, 72 Ariz. 197 , 232 P.2d 846 (1951); Cagle v. Gladden-Driggers Co., 222 Ark. 517 , 261 S.W.2d 536 (1953); Harding v. City of Texarkana, 62 Ark.App. 137 , 970 S.W.2d 303 (1998); Boulevard Manor Nursing Home v. Lacombe, 557 So.2d 945 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990); Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982); Lockwood v. Bd. of Trustees, Speedway Methodist Church, 144 Ind.App. 430 , 246 N.E.2d 774 (1969); Danos v. Great Acceptance Corp., 261 So.2d 339 (La.Ct.App.1972); Belyea's Case, 355 Mass. 721 , 247 N.E.2d 372 (1969); Townsend v. Nelson, 308 Minn. 374 , 24 2001Comm'n, 72 Ariz. 197 , 232 P.2d 846 (1951); Cagle v. Gladden-Driggers Co., 222 Ark. 517 , 261 S.W.2d 536 (1953); Harding v. City of Texarkana, 62 Ark.App. 137 , 970 S.W.2d 303 (1998); Boulevard Manor Nursing Home v. Lacombe, 557 So.2d 945 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990); Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982); Lockwood v. Bd. of Trustees, Speedway Methodist Church, 144 Ind.App. 430 , 246 N.E.2d 774 (1969); Danos v. Great Acceptance Corp., 261 So.2d 339 (La.Ct.App.1972); Belyea's Case, 355 Mass. 721 , 247 N.E.2d 372 (1969); Townsend v. Nelson, 308 Minn. 374 , 24 | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Lockwood v. Board of Trustees
neutral
2 sentences2001Comm'n, 72 Ariz. 197 , 232 P.2d 846 (1951); Cagle v. Gladden-Driggers Co., 222 Ark. 517 , 261 S.W.2d 536 (1953); Harding v. City of Texarkana, 62 Ark.App. 137 , 970 S.W.2d 303 (1998); Boulevard Manor Nursing Home v. Lacombe, 557 So.2d 945 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990); Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982); Lockwood v. Bd. of Trustees, Speedway Methodist Church, 144 Ind.App. 430 , 246 N.E.2d 774 (1969); Danos v. Great Acceptance Corp., 261 So.2d 339 (La.Ct.App.1972); Belyea's Case, 355 Mass. 721 , 247 N.E.2d 372 (1969); Townsend v. Nelson, 308 Minn. 374 , 24 2001Comm'n, 72 Ariz. 197 , 232 P.2d 846 (1951); Cagle v. Gladden-Driggers Co., 222 Ark. 517 , 261 S.W.2d 536 (1953); Harding v. City of Texarkana, 62 Ark.App. 137 , 970 S.W.2d 303 (1998); Boulevard Manor Nursing Home v. Lacombe, 557 So.2d 945 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990); Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982); Lockwood v. Bd. of Trustees, Speedway Methodist Church, 144 Ind.App. 430 , 246 N.E.2d 774 (1969); Danos v. Great Acceptance Corp., 261 So.2d 339 (La.Ct.App.1972); Belyea's Case, 355 Mass. 721 , 247 N.E.2d 372 (1969); Townsend v. Nelson, 308 Minn. 374 , 24 | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Havelin v. Poole Truck Lines, Inc.
green
1 sentence2001The hearing officer stated: "Insofar as t[he Comeau factors] apply to the present facts, they are consistent with the analysis set forth above." [3] See, e.g., Havelin v. Poole Truck Lines, Inc., 395 So.2d 75 (Ala.Civ.Ct.App.1980); Harris v. Indus. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Danos v. Great Acceptance Corp.
neutral
1 sentence2001Comm'n, 72 Ariz. 197 , 232 P.2d 846 (1951); Cagle v. Gladden-Driggers Co., 222 Ark. 517 , 261 S.W.2d 536 (1953); Harding v. City of Texarkana, 62 Ark.App. 137 , 970 S.W.2d 303 (1998); Boulevard Manor Nursing Home v. Lacombe, 557 So.2d 945 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990); Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982); Lockwood v. Bd. of Trustees, Speedway Methodist Church, 144 Ind.App. 430 , 246 N.E.2d 774 (1969); Danos v. Great Acceptance Corp., 261 So.2d 339 (La.Ct.App.1972); Belyea's Case, 355 Mass. 721 , 247 N.E.2d 372 (1969); Townsend v. Nelson, 308 Minn. 374 , 24 | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Morse v. Laverdiere's Super Drug Store
green
2 sentences2000Id. 2000Id. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Department of Human Services v. Richardson
green
1 sentence1995The District Court granted Comeau’s motion to dismiss on the basis of our decision in Department of Human Servs. v. Richardson, 621 A.2d 855 (Me.1993), concluding that dismissal with prejudice of the prior paternity action brought by Helen Boulanger barred the paternity action brought by the Department on its own behalf and on behalf of Carey-Ann. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Dorey v. Forster Manufacturing Co.
green
2 sentences1993Co., 591 A.2d at 242 , they do at least provide a good starting point for analyzing whether the employee’s actions were work related. 1993Co., 591 A.2d at 242 , they do at least provide a good starting point for analyzing whether the employee’s actions were work related. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.