7 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Rashidgreen2 sentences1992In People v Rashid, 154 Mich App 762, 768-770 ; 398 NW2d 525 (1986), a panel of the Court held that a violation of the fourteen-day rule of Shelton is waived by a plea of guilty. 1992In People v Rashid, 154 Mich App 762, 768-770 ; 398 NW2d 525 (1986), a panel of the Court held that a violation of the fourteen-day rule of Shelton is waived by a plea of guilty. | 1 | 2 |
People v. Hendrickgreen2 sentences1990See People v Hendrick, 398 Mich 410 ; 247 NW2d 840 (1976). 1990See People v Hendrick, 398 Mich 410 ; 247 NW2d 840 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Shelton
green
2 sentences2002This case is thus distinguishable from People v Manning, 163 Mich App 641 ; 415 NW2d 1 (1987), where the Court upheld an amendment of a supplemental information outside the fourteen-day rule set forth in [People v Shelton, 412 Mich 565, 569 ; 315 NW2d 537 (1982).] [1] In Manning , the amended supplemental information corrected an error in *472 the specific convictions that formed the basis of the habitual offender, fourth offense charge. 2002This case is thus distinguishable from People v Manning, 163 Mich App 641 ; 415 NW2d 1 (1987), where the Court upheld an amendment of a supplemental information outside the fourteen-day rule set forth in [People v Shelton, 412 Mich 565, 569 ; 315 NW2d 537 (1982).] [1] In Manning , the amended supplemental information corrected an error in *472 the specific convictions that formed the basis of the habitual offender, fourth offense charge. | 4 | 1988–2002 |
People v. Manning
green
2 sentences2002This case is thus distinguishable from People v Manning, 163 Mich App 641 ; 415 NW2d 1 (1987), where the Court upheld an amendment of a supplemental information outside the fourteen-day rule set forth in [People v Shelton, 412 Mich 565, 569 ; 315 NW2d 537 (1982).] [1] In Manning , the amended supplemental information corrected an error in *472 the specific convictions that formed the basis of the habitual offender, fourth offense charge. 2002This case is thus distinguishable from People v Manning, 163 Mich App 641 ; 415 NW2d 1 (1987), where the Court upheld an amendment of a supplemental information outside the fourteen-day rule set forth in [People v Shelton, 412 Mich 565, 569 ; 315 NW2d 537 (1982).] [1] In Manning , the amended supplemental information corrected an error in *472 the specific convictions that formed the basis of the habitual offender, fourth offense charge. | 2 | 1997–2002 |
People v. Heffron
neutral
2 sentences1992Another panel held in People v Heffron, 175 Mich App 543, 548-550 ; 438 NW2d 253 (1988), that a plea of guilty does not waive this issue. 8 In affirming this defendant’s conviction as an habitual offender, the Court of Appeals characterized the Rashid opinion as "the better-reasoned view.” 192 Mich App 230 . 1992Another panel held in People v Heffron, 175 Mich App 543, 548-550 ; 438 NW2d 253 (1988), that a plea of guilty does not waive this issue. 8 In affirming this defendant’s conviction as an habitual offender, the Court of Appeals characterized the Rashid opinion as "the better-reasoned view.” 192 Mich App 230 . | 2 | 1991–1992 |
People v. Eason
green
2 sentences1992Rather, Shelton and the other "rules of practice and procedure that have been developed for prosecutions under the habitual offender provisions are based on this Court’s construction of the relevant statutes, and its exercise of its supervisory power over the practices and procedures in the courts of this state.” People v Eason, 435 Mich 228, 288 ; 458 NW2d 17 (1990) (dissenting opinion of Levin, J.)._ *495 Accordingly, the fourteen-day rule of Shelton does not "implicate[ ] the very authority of the state to bring the defendant to trial . . . 427 Mich 495 . 1992Rather, Shelton and the other "rules of practice and procedure that have been developed for prosecutions under the habitual offender provisions are based on this Court’s construction of the relevant statutes, and its exercise of its supervisory power over the practices and procedures in the courts of this state.” People v Eason, 435 Mich 228, 288 ; 458 NW2d 17 (1990) (dissenting opinion of Levin, J.)._ *495 Accordingly, the fourteen-day rule of Shelton does not "implicate[ ] the very authority of the state to bring the defendant to trial . . . 427 Mich 495 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Detroit Board of Education v. Getz
green
2 sentences1989Moreover, as the Supreme Court held in Detroit Bd of Ed v Getz, 321 Mich 676, 678 ; 33 NW2d 113 (1948): The interest which will thus disqualify a judge must be such an interest in the subject matter that he will be directly affected through pecuniary or property gain or loss. 1989Moreover, as the Supreme Court held in Detroit Bd of Ed v Getz, 321 Mich 676, 678 ; 33 NW2d 113 (1948): The interest which will thus disqualify a judge must be such an interest in the subject matter that he will be directly affected through pecuniary or property gain or loss. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.