7 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tarlea v. Crabtree
green
2 sentences2024It is as though, if an objective observer watched the actor, he could conclude, reasonably, that the actor simply did not care about the safety or welfare of those in his charge. [Tarlea v Crabtree, 263 Mich App 80, 90 ; 687 NW2d 333 (2004).] In Xu v Gay, 257 Mich App 263 ; 668 NW2d 166 (2003), the decedent was injured when he fell backwards while using a treadmill at a fitness center. 2024It is as though, if an objective observer watched the actor, he could conclude, reasonably, that the actor simply did not care about the safety or welfare of those in his charge. [Tarlea v Crabtree, 263 Mich App 80, 90 ; 687 NW2d 333 (2004).] In Xu v Gay, 257 Mich App 263 ; 668 NW2d 166 (2003), the decedent was injured when he fell backwards while using a treadmill at a fitness center. | 6 | 2017–2024 |
Xu v. Gay
green
2 sentences2024It is as though, if an objective observer watched the actor, he could conclude, reasonably, that the actor simply did not care about the safety or welfare of those in his charge. [Tarlea v Crabtree, 263 Mich App 80, 90 ; 687 NW2d 333 (2004).] In Xu v Gay, 257 Mich App 263 ; 668 NW2d 166 (2003), the decedent was injured when he fell backwards while using a treadmill at a fitness center. 2024It is as though, if an objective observer watched the actor, he could conclude, reasonably, that the actor simply did not care about the safety or welfare of those in his charge. [Tarlea v Crabtree, 263 Mich App 80, 90 ; 687 NW2d 333 (2004).] In Xu v Gay, 257 Mich App 263 ; 668 NW2d 166 (2003), the decedent was injured when he fell backwards while using a treadmill at a fitness center. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Bruce T Wood v. City of Detroit
green
2 sentences2023It is as though, if an objective observer watched the actor, he could conclude, reasonably, that the actor simply did not care about the safety or welfare of those in his charge. [Tarlea v Crabtree, 263 Mich App 80, 90 ; 687 NW2d 333 (2004).] “Although questions regarding whether a governmental employee’s conduct constituted gross negligence are generally questions of fact for the jury, if reasonable minds could not differ, summary disposition may be granted.” Wood v Detroit, 323 Mich App 416, 424 ; 917 NW2d 709 (2018). 2023It is as though, if an objective observer watched the actor, he could conclude, reasonably, that the actor simply did not care about the safety or welfare of those in his charge. [Tarlea v Crabtree, 263 Mich App 80, 90 ; 687 NW2d 333 (2004).] “Although questions regarding whether a governmental employee’s conduct constituted gross negligence are generally questions of fact for the jury, if reasonable minds could not differ, summary disposition may be granted.” Wood v Detroit, 323 Mich App 416, 424 ; 917 NW2d 709 (2018). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Oliver v. Smith
green
2 sentences2016It is as though, if an objective observer watched the actor, he could conclude, reasonably, that the actor simply did not care about the safety or welfare of those in his charge. [Id.] “The determination whether a governmental employee's conduct constituted gross negligence under MCL 691.1407 is generally a question of fact, but, if reasonable minds could not differ, a court may grant summary disposition.” Oliver v Smith, 269 Mich App 560, 563 ; 715 NW2d 314 (2006). 2016It is as though, if an objective observer watched the actor, he could conclude, reasonably, that the actor simply did not care about the safety or welfare of those in his charge. [Id.] “The determination whether a governmental employee's conduct constituted gross negligence under MCL 691.1407 is generally a question of fact, but, if reasonable minds could not differ, a court may grant summary disposition.” Oliver v Smith, 269 Mich App 560, 563 ; 715 NW2d 314 (2006). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.