7 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Shackleford v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Shackleford v. State, 51 S.W.3d 125, 128 (Mo.App. 2008Shackleford v. State, 51 S.W.3d 125, 128 (Mo.App. | 2 | 2 |
Rollins v. Stategreen1 sentence2000Rollins v. State, 974 S.W.2d 593, 595 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
White v. State
green
2 sentences1998White, 957 S.W.2d at 807 . 1998White, 957 S.W.2d at 807 . | 2 | 1998–1998 |
Destin v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
green
1 sentence1992Id. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Bradley
green
1 sentence1989Defendant relies upon the three prong test in State v. Bradley, 670 S.W.2d 123 (Mo.App.1984), for determining when an interrogation becomes custodial. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.