parent-child immunity (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

parent-child immunity in North Carolina

7 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Doe ex rel. Connolly v. Holtgreen
nc · 1992 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1994–2015
2 sentences

2015Therefore, this Court concluded that except where statutorily abrogated, id. at 93, 418 S.E.2d at 512-13 , the parent-child immunity doctrine “bax[s] actions between unemancipated children and their parents based on ordinary negligence,” id. at 95 , 418 S.E.2d at 514 .

2015Therefore, this Court concluded that except where statutorily abrogated, id. at 93, 418 S.E.2d at 512-13 , the parent-child immunity doctrine “bax[s] actions between unemancipated children and their parents based on ordinary negligence,” id. at 95 , 418 S.E.2d at 514 .

22
Small Ex Rel. Balthis v. Morrisongreen
nc · 1923 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1992–2015
2 sentences

2015Id. at 95 , 418 S.E.2d at 514 (quotingSmall v. Morrison, 185 N.C. 577, 584 , 118 S.E. 12, 15 (1923)).

2015Therefore, this Court concluded that except where statutorily abrogated, id. at 93, 418 S.E.2d at 512-13 , the parent-child immunity doctrine “bax[s] actions between unemancipated children and their parents based on ordinary negligence,” id. at 95 , 418 S.E.2d at 514 .

12
Lee v. Mowett Sales Co.green
nc · 1986 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1989–1992
2 sentences

1992We declined to do so because “[t]o judicially abolish the parent-child immunity after the legislature has considered and retained the doctrine would be to engage in impermissible judicial legislation.” Lee, 316 N.C. at 494 , 342 S.E.2d at 885 .

1992We declined to do so because “[t]o judicially abolish the parent-child immunity after the legislature has considered and retained the doctrine would be to engage in impermissible judicial legislation.” Lee, 316 N.C. at 494 , 342 S.E.2d at 885 .

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

CaseCitedYears
Hewlett v. George red
miss · 1891
2 sentences

1992The doctrine of parent-child immunity was first recognized in the case of Hewllette v. George, 68 Miss. 703 , 9 So. 885 (1891).

1992In its opinion, the Small Court cited with approval four cases to justify its adoption of the doctrine of parent-child immunity, three of which involved intentional torts: Hewlett v. George, 68 Miss. 703 , 9 So. 885 (1891); McKelvey v. McKelvey, 111 Tenn. 388 , 77 S.W. 664 (1903); Roller v. Roller, 37 Wash. 242 , 79 P. 788 (1905).

21986–1992
Skinner v. Whitley green
nc · 1972
2 sentences

1986In Skinner v. Whitley, 281 N.C. 476 , 189 S.E. 2d 230 (1972), this Court was urged to abolish the parent-child immunity doctrine in the case of a wrongful death caused by a father’s negligence.

1986In Skinner v. Whitley, 281 N.C. 476 , 189 S.E. 2d 230 (1972), this Court was urged to abolish the parent-child immunity doctrine in the case of a wrongful death caused by a father’s negligence.

21986–1992
Mabry Ex Rel. Bowen v. Bowen green
ncctapp · 1972
2 sentences

1994In North Carolina, the parent-child immunity doctrine extends to stepparents standing in loco parentis, Morgan v. Johnson, 24 N.C.App. 307 , 210 S.E.2d 503 (1974); Mabry v. Bowen, 14 N.C.App. 646 , 188 S.E.2d 651 (1972), because applying the parent-child immunity doctrine to the stepparent situation, which is more permanent in nature than those having temporary custody and control, furthers the public policies underlying the doctrine.

1994In North Carolina, the parent-child immunity doctrine extends to stepparents standing in loco parentis, Morgan v. Johnson, 24 N.C.App. 307 , 210 S.E.2d 503 (1974); Mabry v. Bowen, 14 N.C.App. 646 , 188 S.E.2d 651 (1972), because applying the parent-child immunity doctrine to the stepparent situation, which is more permanent in nature than those having temporary custody and control, furthers the public policies underlying the doctrine.

11994–1994
Morgan v. Johnson green
ncctapp · 1974
2 sentences

1994In North Carolina, the parent-child immunity doctrine extends to stepparents standing in loco parentis, Morgan v. Johnson, 24 N.C.App. 307 , 210 S.E.2d 503 (1974); Mabry v. Bowen, 14 N.C.App. 646 , 188 S.E.2d 651 (1972), because applying the parent-child immunity doctrine to the stepparent situation, which is more permanent in nature than those having temporary custody and control, furthers the public policies underlying the doctrine.

1994In North Carolina, the parent-child immunity doctrine extends to stepparents standing in loco parentis, Morgan v. Johnson, 24 N.C.App. 307 , 210 S.E.2d 503 (1974); Mabry v. Bowen, 14 N.C.App. 646 , 188 S.E.2d 651 (1972), because applying the parent-child immunity doctrine to the stepparent situation, which is more permanent in nature than those having temporary custody and control, furthers the public policies underlying the doctrine.

11994–1994
Attwood v. Estate of Attwood green
ark · 1982
2 sentences

1992In Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982), Janice Attwood brought a complaint on behalf of her injured minor son against his father for causing the son injuries.

1992In Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982), Janice Attwood brought a complaint on behalf of her injured minor son against his father for causing the son injuries.

11992–1992
McKelvey v. McKelvey red
tenn · 1903
2 sentences

1992In its opinion, the Small Court cited with approval four cases to justify its adoption of the doctrine of parent-child immunity, three of which involved intentional torts: Hewlett v. George, 68 Miss. 703 , 9 So. 885 (1891); McKelvey v. McKelvey, 111 Tenn. 388 , 77 S.W. 664 (1903); Roller v. Roller, 37 Wash. 242 , 79 P. 788 (1905).

1992In its opinion, the Small Court cited with approval four cases to justify its adoption of the doctrine of parent-child immunity, three of which involved intentional torts: Hewlett v. George, 68 Miss. 703 , 9 So. 885 (1891); McKelvey v. McKelvey, 111 Tenn. 388 , 77 S.W. 664 (1903); Roller v. Roller, 37 Wash. 242 , 79 P. 788 (1905).

11992–1992
Foldi v. Jeffries green
nj · 1983
2 sentences

1992Id. at 545 , 461 A.2d at 1152 .

1992Id. at 545 , 461 A.2d at 1152 .

11992–1992
Doe ex rel. Connolly v. Holt neutral
ncctapp · 1991
1 sentence

1992Doe v. Holt, 103 N.C.

11992–1992
Roller v. Roller green
wash · 1905
2 sentences

1992In its opinion, the Small Court cited with approval four cases to justify its adoption of the doctrine of parent-child immunity, three of which involved intentional torts: Hewlett v. George, 68 Miss. 703 , 9 So. 885 (1891); McKelvey v. McKelvey, 111 Tenn. 388 , 77 S.W. 664 (1903); Roller v. Roller, 37 Wash. 242 , 79 P. 788 (1905).

1992In its opinion, the Small Court cited with approval four cases to justify its adoption of the doctrine of parent-child immunity, three of which involved intentional torts: Hewlett v. George, 68 Miss. 703 , 9 So. 885 (1891); McKelvey v. McKelvey, 111 Tenn. 388 , 77 S.W. 664 (1903); Roller v. Roller, 37 Wash. 242 , 79 P. 788 (1905).

11992–1992
Raftery v. Wm. C. Vick Construction Co. green
nc · 1976
2 sentences

1982Raftery v. Construction Co., 291 N.C. 180 , 230 S.E. 2d 405 (1976) was a wrongful death action based on the negligent design and manufacture of a construction crane.

1982Raftery v. Construction Co., 291 N.C. 180 , 230 S.E. 2d 405 (1976) was a wrongful death action based on the negligent design and manufacture of a construction crane.

11982–1982
Watson Ex Rel. Vaughn v. Nichols green
nc · 1967
2 sentences

1981Watson v. Nichols, 270 N.C. 733 , 155 S.E. 2d 154 (1967).

1981Watson v. Nichols, 270 N.C. 733 , 155 S.E. 2d 154 (1967).

11981–1981

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-539.21 (5) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

MD 36 (1971–2025) CA 18 (2013–2024) NY 17 (1966–2023) IL 16 (1968–2010) NJ 13 (1970–2003) MA 9 (1975–2025) TX 7 (1983–2011) IN 7 (1977–2026) NC 7 (1981–2015) WA 4 (1980–2004) MS 4 (1985–2004) UT 3 (1981–1987) CT 3 (1986–1998) LA 3 (1972–1977) MN 3 (1966–1987) DC 2 (1999–1999) HI 2 (1970–1998) TN 2 (1994–2005) MO 2 (1993–1994) RI 2 (1982–1983) FL 2 (1999–2001)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check