7 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Doe ex rel. Connolly v. Holtgreen2 sentences2015Therefore, this Court concluded that except where statutorily abrogated, id. at 93, 418 S.E.2d at 512-13 , the parent-child immunity doctrine “bax[s] actions between unemancipated children and their parents based on ordinary negligence,” id. at 95 , 418 S.E.2d at 514 . 2015Therefore, this Court concluded that except where statutorily abrogated, id. at 93, 418 S.E.2d at 512-13 , the parent-child immunity doctrine “bax[s] actions between unemancipated children and their parents based on ordinary negligence,” id. at 95 , 418 S.E.2d at 514 . | 2 | 2 |
Small Ex Rel. Balthis v. Morrisongreen2 sentences2015Id. at 95 , 418 S.E.2d at 514 (quotingSmall v. Morrison, 185 N.C. 577, 584 , 118 S.E. 12, 15 (1923)). 2015Therefore, this Court concluded that except where statutorily abrogated, id. at 93, 418 S.E.2d at 512-13 , the parent-child immunity doctrine “bax[s] actions between unemancipated children and their parents based on ordinary negligence,” id. at 95 , 418 S.E.2d at 514 . | 1 | 2 |
Lee v. Mowett Sales Co.green2 sentences1992We declined to do so because “[t]o judicially abolish the parent-child immunity after the legislature has considered and retained the doctrine would be to engage in impermissible judicial legislation.” Lee, 316 N.C. at 494 , 342 S.E.2d at 885 . 1992We declined to do so because “[t]o judicially abolish the parent-child immunity after the legislature has considered and retained the doctrine would be to engage in impermissible judicial legislation.” Lee, 316 N.C. at 494 , 342 S.E.2d at 885 . | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hewlett v. George
red
2 sentences1992The doctrine of parent-child immunity was first recognized in the case of Hewllette v. George, 68 Miss. 703 , 9 So. 885 (1891). 1992In its opinion, the Small Court cited with approval four cases to justify its adoption of the doctrine of parent-child immunity, three of which involved intentional torts: Hewlett v. George, 68 Miss. 703 , 9 So. 885 (1891); McKelvey v. McKelvey, 111 Tenn. 388 , 77 S.W. 664 (1903); Roller v. Roller, 37 Wash. 242 , 79 P. 788 (1905). | 2 | 1986–1992 |
Skinner v. Whitley
green
2 sentences1986In Skinner v. Whitley, 281 N.C. 476 , 189 S.E. 2d 230 (1972), this Court was urged to abolish the parent-child immunity doctrine in the case of a wrongful death caused by a father’s negligence. 1986In Skinner v. Whitley, 281 N.C. 476 , 189 S.E. 2d 230 (1972), this Court was urged to abolish the parent-child immunity doctrine in the case of a wrongful death caused by a father’s negligence. | 2 | 1986–1992 |
Mabry Ex Rel. Bowen v. Bowen
green
2 sentences1994In North Carolina, the parent-child immunity doctrine extends to stepparents standing in loco parentis, Morgan v. Johnson, 24 N.C.App. 307 , 210 S.E.2d 503 (1974); Mabry v. Bowen, 14 N.C.App. 646 , 188 S.E.2d 651 (1972), because applying the parent-child immunity doctrine to the stepparent situation, which is more permanent in nature than those having temporary custody and control, furthers the public policies underlying the doctrine. 1994In North Carolina, the parent-child immunity doctrine extends to stepparents standing in loco parentis, Morgan v. Johnson, 24 N.C.App. 307 , 210 S.E.2d 503 (1974); Mabry v. Bowen, 14 N.C.App. 646 , 188 S.E.2d 651 (1972), because applying the parent-child immunity doctrine to the stepparent situation, which is more permanent in nature than those having temporary custody and control, furthers the public policies underlying the doctrine. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Morgan v. Johnson
green
2 sentences1994In North Carolina, the parent-child immunity doctrine extends to stepparents standing in loco parentis, Morgan v. Johnson, 24 N.C.App. 307 , 210 S.E.2d 503 (1974); Mabry v. Bowen, 14 N.C.App. 646 , 188 S.E.2d 651 (1972), because applying the parent-child immunity doctrine to the stepparent situation, which is more permanent in nature than those having temporary custody and control, furthers the public policies underlying the doctrine. 1994In North Carolina, the parent-child immunity doctrine extends to stepparents standing in loco parentis, Morgan v. Johnson, 24 N.C.App. 307 , 210 S.E.2d 503 (1974); Mabry v. Bowen, 14 N.C.App. 646 , 188 S.E.2d 651 (1972), because applying the parent-child immunity doctrine to the stepparent situation, which is more permanent in nature than those having temporary custody and control, furthers the public policies underlying the doctrine. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Attwood v. Estate of Attwood
green
2 sentences1992In Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982), Janice Attwood brought a complaint on behalf of her injured minor son against his father for causing the son injuries. 1992In Attwood v. Estate of Attwood, 276 Ark. 230 , 633 S.W.2d 366 (1982), Janice Attwood brought a complaint on behalf of her injured minor son against his father for causing the son injuries. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
McKelvey v. McKelvey
red
2 sentences1992In its opinion, the Small Court cited with approval four cases to justify its adoption of the doctrine of parent-child immunity, three of which involved intentional torts: Hewlett v. George, 68 Miss. 703 , 9 So. 885 (1891); McKelvey v. McKelvey, 111 Tenn. 388 , 77 S.W. 664 (1903); Roller v. Roller, 37 Wash. 242 , 79 P. 788 (1905). 1992In its opinion, the Small Court cited with approval four cases to justify its adoption of the doctrine of parent-child immunity, three of which involved intentional torts: Hewlett v. George, 68 Miss. 703 , 9 So. 885 (1891); McKelvey v. McKelvey, 111 Tenn. 388 , 77 S.W. 664 (1903); Roller v. Roller, 37 Wash. 242 , 79 P. 788 (1905). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Foldi v. Jeffries
green
2 sentences1992Id. at 545 , 461 A.2d at 1152 . 1992Id. at 545 , 461 A.2d at 1152 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Doe ex rel. Connolly v. Holt
neutral
1 sentence1992Doe v. Holt, 103 N.C. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Roller v. Roller
green
2 sentences1992In its opinion, the Small Court cited with approval four cases to justify its adoption of the doctrine of parent-child immunity, three of which involved intentional torts: Hewlett v. George, 68 Miss. 703 , 9 So. 885 (1891); McKelvey v. McKelvey, 111 Tenn. 388 , 77 S.W. 664 (1903); Roller v. Roller, 37 Wash. 242 , 79 P. 788 (1905). 1992In its opinion, the Small Court cited with approval four cases to justify its adoption of the doctrine of parent-child immunity, three of which involved intentional torts: Hewlett v. George, 68 Miss. 703 , 9 So. 885 (1891); McKelvey v. McKelvey, 111 Tenn. 388 , 77 S.W. 664 (1903); Roller v. Roller, 37 Wash. 242 , 79 P. 788 (1905). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Raftery v. Wm. C. Vick Construction Co.
green
2 sentences1982Raftery v. Construction Co., 291 N.C. 180 , 230 S.E. 2d 405 (1976) was a wrongful death action based on the negligent design and manufacture of a construction crane. 1982Raftery v. Construction Co., 291 N.C. 180 , 230 S.E. 2d 405 (1976) was a wrongful death action based on the negligent design and manufacture of a construction crane. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Watson Ex Rel. Vaughn v. Nichols
green
2 sentences1981Watson v. Nichols, 270 N.C. 733 , 155 S.E. 2d 154 (1967). 1981Watson v. Nichols, 270 N.C. 733 , 155 S.E. 2d 154 (1967). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.