principles governing claim in Michigan

2022In People v Carbin, 463 Mich 590, 599-600 ; 623 NW2d 884 (2001), our Supreme Court recited the principles governing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel: To justify reversal under either the federal or state constitutions, a convicted defendant must satisfy [a] two-part test . . . .

2022In People v Carbin, 463 Mich 590, 599-600 ; 623 NW2d 884 (2001), our Supreme Court recited the principles governing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel: To justify reversal under either the federal or state constitutions, a convicted defendant must satisfy [a] two-part test . . . .

2018In People v Carbin, 463 Mich 590, 599-600 ; 623 NW2d 884 (2001), our Supreme Court, addressing the basic principles governing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, observed: To justify reversal under either the federal or state constitutions, a convicted defendant must satisfy the two-part test articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 ; 104 S Ct 2052 ; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984).

2018In People v Carbin, 463 Mich 590, 599-600 ; 623 NW2d 884 (2001), our Supreme Court, addressing the basic principles governing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, observed: To justify reversal under either the federal or state constitutions, a convicted defendant must satisfy the two-part test articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 ; 104 S Ct 2052 ; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984).

2022And in Pioneer State Mut Ins Co v Dells, 301 Mich App 368, 377 ; 836 NW2d 257 (2013), this Court set forth the principles governing an analysis under MCR 2.116(C)(10): In general, MCR 2.116(C)(10) provides for summary disposition when there is no genuine issue regarding any material fact and the moving party is entitled -4- to judgment or partial judgment as a matter of law.

2022And in Pioneer State Mut Ins Co v Dells, 301 Mich App 368, 377 ; 836 NW2d 257 (2013), this Court set forth the principles governing an analysis under MCR 2.116(C)(10): In general, MCR 2.116(C)(10) provides for summary disposition when there is no genuine issue regarding any material fact and the moving party is entitled -4- to judgment or partial judgment as a matter of law.

2018Id. 3 But even if Jamila’s testimony regarding the television set was too confusing to establish her ownership of it, the evidence concerning the movement of Jamila’s clothes is sufficient to establish that defendant intended to commit a larceny or aided and abetted in the commission of a larceny. -5- In People v Carbin, 463 Mich 590, 599-600 ; 623 NW2d 884 (2001), our Supreme Court, addressing the basic principles governing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, explained: To justify reversal under either the federal or state constitutions, a convicted defendant must satisfy the two-pa

2018Id. 3 But even if Jamila’s testimony regarding the television set was too confusing to establish her ownership of it, the evidence concerning the movement of Jamila’s clothes is sufficient to establish that defendant intended to commit a larceny or aided and abetted in the commission of a larceny. -5- In People v Carbin, 463 Mich 590, 599-600 ; 623 NW2d 884 (2001), our Supreme Court, addressing the basic principles governing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, explained: To justify reversal under either the federal or state constitutions, a convicted defendant must satisfy the two-pa

2017In People v Carbin, 463 Mich 590, 599-600 ; 623 NW2d 884 (2001), our Supreme Court, addressing the basic principles governing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, observed: 1 People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436, 443 ; 212 NW2d 922 (1973). -2- To justify reversal under either the federal or state constitutions, a convicted defendant must satisfy the two-part test articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 ; 104 S Ct 2052 ; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984).

2017In People v Carbin, 463 Mich 590, 599-600 ; 623 NW2d 884 (2001), our Supreme Court, addressing the basic principles governing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, observed: 1 People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436, 443 ; 212 NW2d 922 (1973). -2- To justify reversal under either the federal or state constitutions, a convicted defendant must satisfy the two-part test articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 ; 104 S Ct 2052 ; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984).

2021People v LeBlanc, 465 Mich 575, 579 ; 640 NW2d 246 (2002).1 In People v Dobek, 274 Mich App 58 , 63- 64; 732 NW2d 546 (2007), this Court observed: 1 In People v Carbin, 463 Mich 590, 599-600 ; 623 NW2d 884 (2001), the Michigan Supreme Court recited the well-established principles governing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel: To justify reversal under either the federal or state constitutions, a convicted defendant must satisfy [a] two-part test . . . .

2021People v LeBlanc, 465 Mich 575, 579 ; 640 NW2d 246 (2002).1 In People v Dobek, 274 Mich App 58 , 63- 64; 732 NW2d 546 (2007), this Court observed: 1 In People v Carbin, 463 Mich 590, 599-600 ; 623 NW2d 884 (2001), the Michigan Supreme Court recited the well-established principles governing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel: To justify reversal under either the federal or state constitutions, a convicted defendant must satisfy [a] two-part test . . . .

2021In People v Mikulen, 324 Mich App 14, 20 ; 919 NW2d 454 (2018), this Court recited the principles governing a claim that there was insufficient evidence to sustain a verdict: In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court must view the evidence— whether direct or circumstantial—in a light most favorable to the prosecution and determine whether a rational trier of fact could find that the essential elements of the crime were proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

2021In People v Mikulen, 324 Mich App 14, 20 ; 919 NW2d 454 (2018), this Court recited the principles governing a claim that there was insufficient evidence to sustain a verdict: In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court must view the evidence— whether direct or circumstantial—in a light most favorable to the prosecution and determine whether a rational trier of fact could find that the essential elements of the crime were proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

2021In Patel v Patel, 324 Mich App 631, 634 ; 922 NW2d 647 (2018), this Court addressed the principles governing waiver: A waiver consists of the intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right.

2021In Patel v Patel, 324 Mich App 631, 634 ; 922 NW2d 647 (2018), this Court addressed the principles governing waiver: A waiver consists of the intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right.

2021People v LeBlanc, 465 Mich 575, 579 ; 640 NW2d 246 (2002).1 In People v Dobek, 274 Mich App 58 , 63- 64; 732 NW2d 546 (2007), this Court observed: 1 In People v Carbin, 463 Mich 590, 599-600 ; 623 NW2d 884 (2001), the Michigan Supreme Court recited the well-established principles governing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel: To justify reversal under either the federal or state constitutions, a convicted defendant must satisfy [a] two-part test . . . .

2021People v LeBlanc, 465 Mich 575, 579 ; 640 NW2d 246 (2002).1 In People v Dobek, 274 Mich App 58 , 63- 64; 732 NW2d 546 (2007), this Court observed: 1 In People v Carbin, 463 Mich 590, 599-600 ; 623 NW2d 884 (2001), the Michigan Supreme Court recited the well-established principles governing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel: To justify reversal under either the federal or state constitutions, a convicted defendant must satisfy [a] two-part test . . . .

2016People v Snider, 239 Mich App 393, 425 ; 608 NW2d 502 (2001), our Supreme Court, addressing the basic principles governing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, stated: To justify reversal under either the federal or state constitutions, a convicted defendant must satisfy the two-part test articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 ; 104 S Ct 2052 ; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984).

2016People v Snider, 239 Mich App 393, 425 ; 608 NW2d 502 (2001), our Supreme Court, addressing the basic principles governing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, stated: To justify reversal under either the federal or state constitutions, a convicted defendant must satisfy the two-part test articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 ; 104 S Ct 2052 ; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984).

2016People v Routley, 485 Mich 1075 ; 777 NW2d 160 (2010). -1- Mich 590, 599-600; 623 NW2d 884 (2001), our Supreme Court, addressing the basic principles governing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, observed: To justify reversal under either the federal or state constitutions, a convicted defendant must satisfy the two-part test articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 ; 104 S Ct 2052 ; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984).

2016People v Routley, 485 Mich 1075 ; 777 NW2d 160 (2010). -1- Mich 590, 599-600; 623 NW2d 884 (2001), our Supreme Court, addressing the basic principles governing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, observed: To justify reversal under either the federal or state constitutions, a convicted defendant must satisfy the two-part test articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 ; 104 S Ct 2052 ; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984).

2016“We review a trial court’s ruling on a motion for reconsideration for an abuse of discretion.” Corporan v Henton, 282 Mich App 599, 605 ; 766 NW2d 903 (2009).8 8 In Pioneer State Mut Ins Co v Dells, 301 Mich App 368, 377 ; 836 NW2d 257 (2013), this Court recited the well-established principles governing the analysis of a motion for summary disposition brought under MCR 2.116(C)(10), observing: In general, MCR 2.116(C)(10) provides for summary disposition when there is no genuine issue regarding any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment or partial judgment as a matter of la

2016“We review a trial court’s ruling on a motion for reconsideration for an abuse of discretion.” Corporan v Henton, 282 Mich App 599, 605 ; 766 NW2d 903 (2009).8 8 In Pioneer State Mut Ins Co v Dells, 301 Mich App 368, 377 ; 836 NW2d 257 (2013), this Court recited the well-established principles governing the analysis of a motion for summary disposition brought under MCR 2.116(C)(10), observing: In general, MCR 2.116(C)(10) provides for summary disposition when there is no genuine issue regarding any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment or partial judgment as a matter of la

2000As one can readily see from that page of Cannes, non-constitutional preserved error is evaluated under the standard set forth in People v Lukity, 460 Mich 484 ; 596 NW2d 607 (1999).

2000As one can readily see from that page of Cannes, non-constitutional preserved error is evaluated under the standard set forth in People v Lukity, 460 Mich 484 ; 596 NW2d 607 (1999).

2000There remains, however, the question whether this error was harmless. c A chart outlining the principles governing an inquiry into harmless error is set forth in People v Carines, 460 Mich 750, 774 ; 597 NW2d 130 (1999).

2000There remains, however, the question whether this error was harmless. c A chart outlining the principles governing an inquiry into harmless error is set forth in People v Carines, 460 Mich 750, 774 ; 597 NW2d 130 (1999).

1978The principles governing our inquiry into the validity of a statutory delegation to the administrator of rule-making power were summarized recently in Department of Natural Resources v Seaman, 396 Mich 299, 308-309 ; 240 NW2d 206 (1976): "In making this determination whether the statute contains sufficient limits or standards we must be mind ful of the fact that such standards must be sufficiently broad to permit efficient administration in order to properly carry out the policy of the Legislature but not so broad as to leave the people unprotected from uncontrolled, arbitrary power in the han

1978The principles governing our inquiry into the validity of a statutory delegation to the administrator of rule-making power were summarized recently in Department of Natural Resources v Seaman, 396 Mich 299, 308-309 ; 240 NW2d 206 (1976): "In making this determination whether the statute contains sufficient limits or standards we must be mind ful of the fact that such standards must be sufficiently broad to permit efficient administration in order to properly carry out the policy of the Legislature but not so broad as to leave the people unprotected from uncontrolled, arbitrary power in the han