7 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
King v. Kinggreen2 sentences2018Moreover, "it is generally the appellant's duty and responsibility to see that the record is in proper form and complete and this Court will not presume error by the trial court when none appears on the record to this Court." King v. King , 146 N.C. 2017Appeal is the same as provided for appeals in civil actions." The Board of Education is the appellant and "it is generally the appellant's duty and responsibility to see that the record is in *352 proper form and complete and this Court will not presume error by the trial court when none appears on the record to this Court." King v. King , 146 N.C. | 2 | 4 |
Gea, Inc. v. Luxury Auctions Mktg., Inc.green2 sentences2026Further, “ ‘it is generally the appellant’s duty and responsibility to see that the record is in proper form and complete and this Court will not presume error by the trial court when none appears on the record to this Court.’ ” GEA, Inc. v. Luxury Auctions Mktg., Inc., 259 N.C. 2026Opinion of the Court trial court when none appears on the record to this Court.’ ” GEA, Inc. v. Luxury Auctions Mktg., Inc., 259 N.C. | 1 | 2 |
Viar v. North Carolina Department of Transportationgreen1 sentence2020Dep’t of Transp., 359 N.C. 400, 402 (2005), and this Court will not presume error where none is shown. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Williamsgreen1 sentence2020See State v. Williams, 274 N.C. 328, 333 (1968) (“An appellate court is not required to, and should not, assume error by the trial judge when none appears on the record before the appellate court.”). | 1 | 1 |
Pharr v. Worleygreen1 sentence2001App. 136, 139 , 479 S.E.2d 32, 34 (1997) (it is generally the *446 “appellant’s duty and responsibility to see that the record is in proper form and complete” and this Court will not presume error by the trial court when none appears on the record to this Court). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Granville Medical Center v. Tipton
green
2 sentences2017Ctr. v. Tipton, 160 N.C. 2017Ctr. v. Tipton , 160 N.C. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.