complainant claim in New Jersey

1943Lean v. Leeds, 92 N.J.

1941Clarke has been determined by a judgment rendered in a foreign court to be valid and matured, has a standing under our statute to maintain this suit to have the fraudulent transfer by its judgment debtor set aside, notwithstanding that complainant has no lien on the transferred *Page 348 property ( Harder v. Harder, 113 N.J.

1941"The chancellor may provide for the inclusion of such allowances in the taxable costs, * * *." The complainant's application was not an application for "an outright dismissal but a conditional one." American Safety Razor Corp. v. Weissbard, supra; Albert v. Clarendon Land Investment and Agency Co., supra. This court is without jurisdiction in the instant suit.

1941Chancellor Green said in Holdrege v. Gwynne, 18 N.J.

1939Lentheric, Inc. , v. Weissbard ( Chancery, 1937 ), 122 N.J.

1934Eq. 233 (at p. 234.); 83 Atl.

1924Stat. 5777 ), which provides that — "If more than one person claims the title or possession of the goods, the warehouseman may * * * require all known claimants to interplead." It was decided by this court in New Jersey Title Guarantee and Trust Co. v. Rector, supra , that a complainant could not claim the benefit of this section, unless he showed that he had complied with the other requirements of the statute as to giving warehouse receipt for the goods stored, and that the receipt given by the then complainant did not so comply.