53 Arkansas opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2022 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Penn v. Stategreen2 sentences2020Wallace v. State, 2018 Ark. 164 , 545 S.W.3d 767 ; see also Penn v. State, 282 Ark. 571 , 670 S.W.2d 426 (1984) (A mere naked allegation that a constitutional right has been invaded will not suffice to warrant coram nobis relief.). 2020Wallace v. State, 2018 Ark. 164 , 545 S.W.3d 767 ; see also Penn v. State, 282 Ark. 571 , 670 S.W.2d 426 (1984) (A mere naked allegation that a constitutional right has been invaded will not suffice to warrant coram nobis relief.). | 11 | 11 |
Smith v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Smith v. State, 2015 Ark. 188, at 4-5 , 461 S.W.3d 345, 349 (per curiam). 2016Smith v. State, 2015 Ark. 188, at 4-5 , 461 S.W.3d 345, 349 (per curiam). | 3 | 3 |
Davis v. Stategreen2 sentences2017Davis v. State, 2016 Ark. 296, at 3 , 498 S.W.3d 279, 281 (per curiam). 2017Stenhouse v. State, 2016 Ark. 296, at 3-4 , 497 S.W.3d 679, 682 (per curiam). | 1 | 3 |
Clorid v. Stategreen2 sentences2017See Cloird v. State, 357 Ark. 446, 452 , 182 S.W.3d 477, 480 (2004) (setting forth the factors that must be demonstrated to state a sufficient Brady claim). 2017See Cloird v. State, 357 Ark. 446, 452 , 182 S.W.3d 477, 480 (2004) (setting forth the factors that must be demonstrated to state a sufficient Brady claim). | 1 | 1 |
Stenhouse v. Stategreen1 sentence2017Stenhouse v. State, 2016 Ark. 296, at 3-4 , 497 S.W.3d 679, 682 (per curiam). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wallace v. State
green
2 sentences2022Wallace v. State, 2018 Ark. 164 , 545 S.W.3d 767 . 2022Wallace v. State, 2018 Ark. 164 , 545 S.W.3d 767 . | 21 | 2018–2022 |
Martinez-Marmol v. State
green
2 sentences2020Martinez-Marmol v. State, 2018 Ark. 145 , 544 S.W.3d 49 . 2020Martinez-Marmol, 2018 4 Ark. 145 , 544 S.W.3d 49 . | 10 | 2018–2020 |
Jackson v. State
green
2 sentences2022Jackson v. State, 2017 Ark. 195 , 520 S.W.3d 242 . 2022Jackson v. State, 2017 Ark. 195 , 520 S.W.3d 242 . | 4 | 2020–2022 |
Jones v. State
green
2 sentences2022Jones v. State, 2017 Ark. 334 , 531 S.W.3d 384 . 2022Jones v. State, 2017 Ark. 334 , 531 S.W.3d 384 . | 3 | 2018–2022 |
Davis v. State
green
2 sentences2021Davis v. State, 2019 Ark. 172 , 574 S.W.3d 666 . 2021Davis v. State, 2019 Ark. 172 , 574 S.W.3d 666 . | 3 | 2019–2021 |
Brady v. Maryland
green
2 sentences2019While Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) violations are within the purview of coram nobis relief, the fact that a petitioner alleges a Brady violation is not, in itself, a sufficient basis for the writ. 2018Claims for Issuance of the Writ As his first ground for issuance of the writ, Henington contends that the prosecutor committed misconduct and violated Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), by failing to engage in the discovery process and disclose all evidence known to the State that was favorable to the defense. 1 The mere fact that a petitioner alleges a Brady violation is not sufficient to provide a basis for error coram nobis relief. | 3 | 2016–2019 |
Howard v. State
green
2 sentences2020Howard v. State, 2012 Ark. 177 , 403 S.W.3d 38 . 1 Because there is no basis on which to issue the writ, Joiner’s pro se motion for appointment of counsel is denied. 2 While Brady violations come within the purview of coram nobis relief, the fact that a petitioner alleges a Brady violation is not, in itself, sufficient to provide a basis for the writ. 2020Howard v. State, 2012 Ark. 177 , 403 S.W.3d 38 . 1 Because there is no basis on which to issue the writ, Joiner’s pro se motion for appointment of counsel is denied. 2 While Brady violations come within the purview of coram nobis relief, the fact that a petitioner alleges a Brady violation is not, in itself, sufficient to provide a basis for the writ. | 2 | 2013–2020 |
Ligon v. Rees
green
2 sentences2016Camp v. State, 2010 Ark. 226 , 364 S.W.3d 7 (per curiam). 2016Camp v. State, 2010 Ark. 226 , 364 S.W.3d 7 (per curiam). | 2 | 2015–2016 |
Edmond McClinton v. State of Arkansas
neutral
2 sentences2021McClinton v. State, 2020 Ark. 153 , 597 S.W.3d 647 . 2021McClinton v. State, 2020 Ark. 153 , 597 S.W.3d 647 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Roy Lee Russell v. State of Arkansas
neutral
2 sentences2021Russell v. State, 2021 Ark. 119, at 3 , 623 S.W.3d 117, 120 . 2021Russell v. State, 2021 Ark. 119, at 3 , 623 S.W.3d 117, 120 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
TRENCIE OLIVER v. STATE OF ARKANSAS
neutral
1 sentence2020Oliver v. State, 2020 Ark. 233 , 602 S.W.3d 76 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Mitchell v. Walker
neutral
1 sentence2020Martinez-Marmol, 2018 4 Ark. 145 , 544 S.W.3d 49 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Buchanan v. State
neutral
1 sentence2020Id. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Lee Sullivan Ivory v. State of Arkansas
neutral
1 sentence2020Ivory v. State, 2019 Ark. 386 , 589 S.W.3d 378 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
KENNETH R. ISOM v. STATE OF ARKANSAS
green
1 sentence2019Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Osburn v. State
green
1 sentence2019Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Green v. State
green
2 sentences2017Green, 2016 Ark. 386 , 502 S.W.3d 524 . 2017Green, 2016 Ark. 386 , 502 S.W.3d 524 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Ashby v. State
neutral
2 sentences2016Ashby v. State, 2016 Ark. 205 , 492 S.W.3d 71 (per curiam). 2016Ashby v. State, 2016 Ark. 205 , 492 S.W.3d 71 (per curiam). | 1 | 2016–2016 |