7 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Martin v. Martingreen2 sentences2020Therefore, “[t]he trial court has the obligation to test any proposal of the parents to see if it meets the Child Support Guidelines under the Marker standard even if the parties agree between themselves to a different amount or agree that one party should assume all support.” Id. 2020Therefore, “[t]he trial court has the obligation to test any proposal of the parents to see if it meets the Child Support Guidelines under the Marker standard even if the parties agree between themselves to a different amount or agree that one party should assume all support.” Id. | 4 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
DePalmo v. DePalmo
green
2 sentences2008DePalmo , 78 Ohio St.3d at 540 . {¶ 31} The trial court is obligated to test any proposal of the parents to see if it meets the child support guidelines under the Marker standard, even when the parties agree to an amount different than the guidelines, or agree that only one party shall assume all support. 2008DePalmo , 78 Ohio St.3d at 540 . {¶ 31} The trial court is obligated to test any proposal of the parents to see if it meets the child support guidelines under the Marker standard, even when the parties agree to an amount different than the guidelines, or agree that only one party shall assume all support. | 2 | 2000–2008 |
Marker v. Grimm
green
2 sentences2005In Marker v. Grimm (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 139 , 601 N.E.2d 496 , the Ohio Supreme Court addressed the issue of when a trial court should deviate from the child support figure arrived at by using a child support worksheet. 2005In Marker v. Grimm (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 139 , 601 N.E.2d 496 , the Ohio Supreme Court addressed the issue of when a trial court should deviate from the child support figure arrived at by using a child support worksheet. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.