preexisting statutory framework in Oregon

7 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 2024–2025 7 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Wallacegreen or · 2024 · cited in 2 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025 2 sentences 2025See Wallace, 373 Or at 133 (describing what constitutes a statute’s “context”). 2025See Wallace, 373 Or at 133 (describing what constitutes a statute’s “context”).	2	2
Sherman v. Dept. of Human Servicesgreen or · 2021 · cited in 2 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024 2 sentences 2024See Sherman v. Dept. of Human Services, 368 Or 403, 411-12 , 492 P3d 31 (2021) (con- sidering case law at first level of Gaines analysis); Polacek and Polacek, 349 Or 278, 284 , 243 P3d 1190 (2010) (rele- vant statutory context includes other provisions of same or related statutes, the preexisting statutory framework, and prior opinions of this court interpreting the pertinent text). 2024See Sherman v. Dept. of Human Services, 368 Or 403, 411-12 , 492 P3d 31 (2021) (con- sidering case law at first level of Gaines analysis); Polacek and Polacek, 349 Or 278, 284 , 243 P3d 1190 (2010) (rele- vant statutory context includes other provisions of same or related statutes, the preexisting statutory framework, and prior opinions of this court interpreting the pertinent text).	2	2

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

Case	Cited	Years
In Re the Marriage of Polacek green or · 2010 2 sentences 2024See Sherman v. Dept. of Human Services, 368 Or 403, 411-12 , 492 P3d 31 (2021) (con- sidering case law at first level of Gaines analysis); Polacek and Polacek, 349 Or 278, 284 , 243 P3d 1190 (2010) (rele- vant statutory context includes other provisions of same or related statutes, the preexisting statutory framework, and prior opinions of this court interpreting the pertinent text). 2024See Sherman v. Dept. of Human Services, 368 Or 403, 411-12 , 492 P3d 31 (2021) (con- sidering case law at first level of Gaines analysis); Polacek and Polacek, 349 Or 278, 284 , 243 P3d 1190 (2010) (rele- vant statutory context includes other provisions of same or related statutes, the preexisting statutory framework, and prior opinions of this court interpreting the pertinent text).	5	2024–2025
Ogle v. Nooth green or · 2014 2 sentences 2025Ogle v. Nooth, 355 Or 570, 584 , 330 P3d 572 (2014) (citing Polacek and Polacek, 349 Or 278, 284 , 243 P3d 1190 (2010)). 2025Ogle v. Nooth, 355 Or 570, 584 , 330 P3d 572 (2014) (citing Polacek and Polacek, 349 Or 278, 284 , 243 P3d 1190 (2010)).	3	2025–2025

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.405 (5) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 163.427 (4) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 174.020 (4) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 137.540 (3) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.015 (3) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 164.354 (3) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.065 (3) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.240 (3) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.250 (3) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.360 (3) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.370 (3) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 174.010 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OR 7 (2024–2025) CA 3 (2004–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check