7 Rhode Island opinions name it 1 courts 1989–1994 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Russian v. Life-Cap Tire Services, Inc.green1 sentence1994A party opposing a motion for summary judgment “may not rest upon mere allegations or denials in its pleadings [but] has an affirmative duty to set forth specific facts showing a genuine issue of fact to be resolved at trial.” Russian v. Life-Cap Tire Services, Inc., 608 A.2d 1145, 1147 (R.I.1992) (citing Quimette v. Moran, 541 A.2d 855, 856 (R.I.1988). | 1 | 1 |
Ouimette v. Morangreen1 sentence1994A party opposing a motion for summary judgment “may not rest upon mere allegations or denials in its pleadings [but] has an affirmative duty to set forth specific facts showing a genuine issue of fact to be resolved at trial.” Russian v. Life-Cap Tire Services, Inc., 608 A.2d 1145, 1147 (R.I.1992) (citing Quimette v. Moran, 541 A.2d 855, 856 (R.I.1988). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. D'ALO
green
1 sentence1993We are of the opinion that 1) the trial judge’s rulings on the admissibility of evidence do not require reversal either individually or cumulatively; 2) the trial judge properly charged the jury with the applicable law (State v. D’Alo, 435 A.2d 317 (R.I.1981), holding that a trial judge may charge the jury in his or her own words as long as the applicable law is stated); and 3) the exclusion of certain medical affidavits was not error in light of this court’s holding in Cuddy v. Schiavonne, 568 A.2d 1387 (R.I.1990). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Putnam Furniture Leasing Co., Inc. v. Borden
green
1 sentence1993In a prior order entered in this case, we stated: “Considering the provisions of G.L.1966 (1985 Reenactment) § 9-12-10 in light of our interpretation of said statute in Putnam Furniture Leasing Co., Inc. v. Walter Borden, et al., 539 A.2d 73 (R.I.1988), we conclude that a defendant who takes an appeal from a judgment of the District Court appeals only those issues by which he or she has been aggrieved. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Cuddy v. Schiavonne
green
1 sentence1993We are of the opinion that 1) the trial judge’s rulings on the admissibility of evidence do not require reversal either individually or cumulatively; 2) the trial judge properly charged the jury with the applicable law (State v. D’Alo, 435 A.2d 317 (R.I.1981), holding that a trial judge may charge the jury in his or her own words as long as the applicable law is stated); and 3) the exclusion of certain medical affidavits was not error in light of this court’s holding in Cuddy v. Schiavonne, 568 A.2d 1387 (R.I.1990). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. DeRoche
green
2 sentences1993The court is of the opinion that the hearing in this matter involved a clear violation of our holding in State v. DeRoche, 120 R.I. 523 , 389 A.2d 1229 (1978). 1993The court is of the opinion that the hearing in this matter involved a clear violation of our holding in State v. DeRoche, 120 R.I. 523 , 389 A.2d 1229 (1978). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Maloney v. Cook
green
2 sentences1993Section 45-15-9(a) provides that “a person injured shall within sixty days give to the municipality notice of the time, place and cause of the injury * * In Maloney v. Cooke, 21 R.I. 471 , 44 A. 692 (1899) plaintiff had notified the city that she had fallen “while walking on the southerly side of Church Street.” This court ruled that notice was insufficient or too vague and general to meet the statute’s purpose of adequately informing the city council of the defect causing the injury. 1993Section 45-15-9(a) provides that “a person injured shall within sixty days give to the municipality notice of the time, place and cause of the injury * * In Maloney v. Cooke, 21 R.I. 471 , 44 A. 692 (1899) plaintiff had notified the city that she had fallen “while walking on the southerly side of Church Street.” This court ruled that notice was insufficient or too vague and general to meet the statute’s purpose of adequately informing the city council of the defect causing the injury. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Chase
green
1 sentence1992In Chase we held that “a finding of nonviolation at a probation-revocation hearing precludes the state from relitigating the issue of defendant’s guilt or innocence for the criminal offense.” 588 A.2d at 121-22 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Knudsen v. Warner
green
1 sentence1989The maintenance of a public highway is a public duty which is clearly controlled by our holding of Knudsen v. Hall, 490 A.2d 976 (R.I.1985). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.