52 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 2010–2026 21 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Tibbettsgreen2 sentences2021“A reviewing court will not overturn a conviction on a sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim unless reasonable minds could not reach the conclusion that the trier of fact did.” Id. at ¶ 26, citing State v. Tibbetts, 92 Ohio St.3d 146, 162 , 749 N.E.2d 326 (2001). {¶38} Appellant was convicted of kidnapping under R.C. 2905.01(A)(2), which in pertinent part requires proof that “by force, threat, or deception,” the offender did “restrain the liberty of [the victim] * * * [t]o facilitate the commission of any felony or flight thereafter.” (Emphasis added). 2019Accordingly, “[a] reviewing court will not overturn a conviction on a sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim unless reasonable minds could not reach the conclusion that the trier of fact did.” Bradshaw at ¶¶ 14- 15; citing State v. Tibbetts, 92 Ohio St.3d 146, 162 , 749 N.E.2d 226 (2001); State v. Treesh, 90 Ohio St.3d 460, 484 , 739 N.E.2d 749 (2001). | 12 | 52 |
State v. Treeshgreen2 sentences2019Accordingly, “[a] reviewing court will not overturn a conviction on a sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim unless reasonable minds could not reach the conclusion that the trier of fact did.” Bradshaw at ¶¶ 14- 15; citing State v. Tibbetts, 92 Ohio St.3d 146, 162 , 749 N.E.2d 226 (2001); State v. Treesh, 90 Ohio St.3d 460, 484 , 739 N.E.2d 749 (2001). 2019Accordingly, “[a] reviewing court will not overturn a conviction on a sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim unless reasonable minds could not reach the conclusion that the trier of fact did.” Bradshaw at ¶¶ 14- 15; citing State v. Tibbetts, 92 Ohio St.3d 146, 162 , 749 N.E.2d 226 (2001); State v. Treesh, 90 Ohio St.3d 460, 484 , 739 N.E.2d 749 (2001). | 6 | 49 |
State v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2021The Ohio Revised Code does not define “restraint,” but the Tenth District Court of Appeals has stated that “[r]estraining an individual's liberty means limiting or restraining their freedom of movement.” State v. Williams, 2017-Ohio-5598 , 93 N.E.3d 449, ¶ 19 (10th Dist.) {¶39} The evidence indicates that appellant used force by pinning C.E.’s knees together on the stairs, which restrained her liberty for the purpose of committing attempted rape, which is a felony. 2021The Ohio Revised Code does not define “restraint,” but the Tenth District Court of Appeals has stated that “[r]estraining an individual's liberty means limiting or restraining their freedom of movement.” State v. Williams, 2017-Ohio-5598 , 93 N.E.3d 449, ¶ 19 (10th Dist.) {¶39} The evidence indicates that appellant used force by pinning C.E.’s knees together on the stairs, which restrained her liberty for the purpose of committing attempted rape, which is a felony. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Thompkins
red
2 sentences2026State v. Tibbetts, 92 Ohio St.3d 146, 162 (2001); State v. Treesh, 90 Ohio St.3d 460, 484 (2001). {¶93} “Although a court of appeals may determine that a Adams App. No. 25CA1218 41 judgment of a trial court is sustained by sufficient evidence, that court may nevertheless conclude that the judgment is against the weight of the evidence.” Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d at 387 . 2025State v. Tibbetts, 92 Ohio St.3d 146, 162 (2001); State v. Treesh, 90 Ohio St.3d 460, 484 (2001). {¶81} “Although a court of appeals may determine that a judgment of a trial court is sustained by sufficient evidence, that court may nevertheless conclude that the judgment is against the weight of the evidence.” Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d at 387 . | 15 | 2010–2026 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.