7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Tran v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.green2 sentences2021The court reasoned that “no reasonable juror could conclude that Tran substantially cooperated in the investigation or settlement of his claim” and that his conduct “‘constitutes a breach of the cooperation clause as a matter of law.’” Tran, 136 Wn.2d at 228 (quoting Pilgrim, 89 Wn. 2001We say that because a breach of the cooperation clause of the policy, like we saw in Tran, entirely prejudices an insurer’s “ability to determine coverage.” Tran, 136 Wn.2d at 229 . | 2 | 5 |
Tran v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.green2 sentences2001We say that because a breach of the cooperation clause of the policy, like we saw in Tran, entirely prejudices an insurer's "ability to determine coverage." Tran, 136 Wash.2d at 229 , 961 P.2d 358 . 2001See Tran v. State Farm, 136 Wash.2d 214, 228 , 961 P.2d 358 (1998); Pilgrim v. State Farm Fire & Cas. | 1 | 2 |
Pilgrim v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurancegreen2 sentences1998His failure to cooperate, therefore, “constitutes a breach of the cooperation clause as a matter of law.” Pilgrim, 89 Wn. 1998His failure to cooperate, therefore, "constitutes a breach of the cooperation clause as a matter of law." Pilgrim, 89 Wash.App. at 723 , 950 P.2d 479 (footnote omitted). | 1 | 2 |
Happy Hank Auction Co. v. American Eagle Fire Insurancegreen2 sentences1998Co., 286 A.D. 505, 509 , 145 N.Y.S.2d 206, 211 (1955), aff'd in part, modified in part on other grounds, 1 N.Y.2d 534 , 154 N.Y.S.2d 870 , 136 N.E.2d 842 (1956) (insurance companies "have no license to harass [their insured] with aimless questions and demands for documents, or with random shots in the dark."). [3] See also 8 John Alan Appleman and Jean Appleman, Insurance Law and Practice § 4772, at p. 215-19 (1981) ("A breach of the cooperation clause by the insured will operate to relieve the insurer of liability under the policy. 1998Co., 286 A.D. 505, 509 , 145 N.Y.S.2d 206, 211 (1955), aff'd in part, modified in part on other grounds, 1 N.Y.2d 534 , 154 N.Y.S.2d 870 , 136 N.E.2d 842 (1956) (insurance companies "have no license to harass [their insured] with aimless questions and demands for documents, or with random shots in the dark."). [3] See also 8 John Alan Appleman and Jean Appleman, Insurance Law and Practice § 4772, at p. 215-19 (1981) ("A breach of the cooperation clause by the insured will operate to relieve the insurer of liability under the policy. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
HAPPY HANK CO. v. Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence1998Co., 286 A.D. 505, 509 , 145 N.Y.S.2d 206, 211 (1955), aff'd in part, modified in part on other grounds, 1 N.Y.2d 534 , 154 N.Y.S.2d 870 , 136 N.E.2d 842 (1956) (insurance companies "have no license to harass [their insured] with aimless questions and demands for documents, or with random shots in the dark."). [3] See also 8 John Alan Appleman and Jean Appleman, Insurance Law and Practice § 4772, at p. 215-19 (1981) ("A breach of the cooperation clause by the insured will operate to relieve the insurer of liability under the policy. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Happy Hank Auction Co. v. American Eagle Fire Insurance
green
2 sentences1998Co., 286 A.D. 505, 509 , 145 N.Y.S.2d 206, 211 (1955), aff'd in part, modified in part on other grounds, 1 N.Y.2d 534 , 154 N.Y.S.2d 870 , 136 N.E.2d 842 (1956) (insurance companies "have no license to harass [their insured] with aimless questions and demands for documents, or with random shots in the dark."). [3] See also 8 John Alan Appleman and Jean Appleman, Insurance Law and Practice § 4772, at p. 215-19 (1981) ("A breach of the cooperation clause by the insured will operate to relieve the insurer of liability under the policy. 1998Co., 286 A.D. 505, 509 , 145 N.Y.S.2d 206, 211 (1955), aff'd in part, modified in part on other grounds, 1 N.Y.2d 534 , 154 N.Y.S.2d 870 , 136 N.E.2d 842 (1956) (insurance companies "have no license to harass [their insured] with aimless questions and demands for documents, or with random shots in the dark."). [3] See also 8 John Alan Appleman and Jean Appleman, Insurance Law and Practice § 4772, at p. 215-19 (1981) ("A breach of the cooperation clause by the insured will operate to relieve the insurer of liability under the policy. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Pilgrim v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence1998His failure to cooperate, therefore, "constitutes a breach of the cooperation clause as a matter of law." Pilgrim, 89 Wash.App. at 723 , 950 P.2d 479 (footnote omitted). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.