event a preliminary hearing in Washington

7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1979–1985 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

Case	Followed	Cited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Edwards green wash · 1980 2 sentences 1980The philosophy of not extending the time beyond 10 days following the arrest was reasserted in State v. Edwards, 94 Wn.2d 208 , 616 P.2d 620 (1980) , where the court simply ruled out language which made such time applicable only in the event a preliminary hearing was not held. 1980The philosophy of not extending the time beyond 10 days following the arrest was reasserted in State v. Edwards, 94 Wn.2d 208 , 616 P.2d 620 (1980) , where the court simply ruled out language which made such time applicable only in the event a preliminary hearing was not held.	3	1980–1983
State v. Schapiro green washctapp · 1981 2 sentences 1983In the most recent decision to address the applicability of State v. Edwards, 94 Wn.2d 208 , 616 P.2d 620 (1980), the Court of Appeals reverted to the position originally taken in State v. Schapiro, 28 Wn. 1983In the most recent decision to address the applicability of State v. Edwards, 94 Wn.2d 208 , 616 P.2d 620 (1980), the Court of Appeals reverted to the position originally taken in State v. Schapiro, 28 Wn.	2	1981–1983
State v. Brown neutral washctapp · 1983 2 sentences 1985Review denied by Supreme Court June 7, 1985. 1 CrR 3.3(b)(1) provided: "The time limits set forth in subsections (b)(2) and (b)(3) shall commence to run from the date: (a) of the order binding the defendant over to the superior court following a preliminary hearing pursuant to JCrR 2.03 or (b) of the tenth day following the defendant's arrest in the event a preliminary hearing is not held or the charge is initially filed in the superior court." 2 The State also claims 90 days, rather than 60 days, is the proper time period since Mr. Brown was being held in jail on unrelated charges, and cites 1985App. 843, 845 , 658 P.2d 44 , review denied, 99 Wn.2d 1012 (1983).	1	1985–1985
State v. Darden green washctapp · 1981 1 sentence 1982This court recently decided the issue of the retroac tivity of the Edwards decision in State v. Darden, 30 Wn.	1	1982–1982
State v. Striker green wash · 1976 2 sentences 1979Effective November 17, 1978, CrR 3.3(b) was amended to comport with the State v. Striker, 87 Wn.2d 870 , 557 P.2d 847 (1976), and State v. Peterson, 90 Wn.2d 423 , 585 P.2d 66 (1978), holdings: "(1) The time limits set forth in subsections (b)(2) and (b)(3) shall commence to run from the date: (a) of the order binding the defendant over to the superior court following a preliminary hearing pursuant to JCrR 2.03 or (b) of the tenth day following the defendant's arrest in the event a preliminary hearing is not held or the charge is initially filed in the superior court. "(2) A defendant unable t 1979Effective November 17, 1978, CrR 3.3(b) was amended to comport with the State v. Striker, 87 Wn.2d 870 , 557 P.2d 847 (1976), and State v. Peterson, 90 Wn.2d 423 , 585 P.2d 66 (1978), holdings: "(1) The time limits set forth in subsections (b)(2) and (b)(3) shall commence to run from the date: (a) of the order binding the defendant over to the superior court following a preliminary hearing pursuant to JCrR 2.03 or (b) of the tenth day following the defendant's arrest in the event a preliminary hearing is not held or the charge is initially filed in the superior court. "(2) A defendant unable t	1	1979–1979
State v. Peterson red wash · 1978 2 sentences 1979Effective November 17, 1978, CrR 3.3(b) was amended to comport with the State v. Striker, 87 Wn.2d 870 , 557 P.2d 847 (1976), and State v. Peterson, 90 Wn.2d 423 , 585 P.2d 66 (1978), holdings: "(1) The time limits set forth in subsections (b)(2) and (b)(3) shall commence to run from the date: (a) of the order binding the defendant over to the superior court following a preliminary hearing pursuant to JCrR 2.03 or (b) of the tenth day following the defendant's arrest in the event a preliminary hearing is not held or the charge is initially filed in the superior court. "(2) A defendant unable t 1979Effective November 17, 1978, CrR 3.3(b) was amended to comport with the State v. Striker, 87 Wn.2d 870 , 557 P.2d 847 (1976), and State v. Peterson, 90 Wn.2d 423 , 585 P.2d 66 (1978), holdings: "(1) The time limits set forth in subsections (b)(2) and (b)(3) shall commence to run from the date: (a) of the order binding the defendant over to the superior court following a preliminary hearing pursuant to JCrR 2.03 or (b) of the tenth day following the defendant's arrest in the event a preliminary hearing is not held or the charge is initially filed in the superior court. "(2) A defendant unable t	1	1979–1979

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check