7 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
J.B. v. Department of Social & Health Servicesgreen2 sentences2020See j~j~ Parental Rights to K.J.B., 187 Wn.2d 592, 604 , 387 P.3d 1072 (2017) (even though formal findings are not required under RCW 13.34.180(1)(f), “the superior court is expressly required to ‘consider’ the incarceration factors”). 14 Even considering that Jimyco was chronically incarcerated during the remainder of the dependency, this fact does not detract from the reality that (1) he was regularly out of custody during this same period and available to engage in services and (2) he agreed to complete the psychological evaluation when released from custody. -9- No. 79992-4-1/10 Next, Jimy 2019Consideration of the incarceration factors under RCW 13.34.180(f) means "'a weighing or balancing of facts, along with a resolution of that weighing." K.J.B., 187 Wn.2d at 603 (quoting In re Parental Rights to M.J., 187 Wn. | 2 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re the Parental Rights to M.J.
green
2 sentences2019Consideration of the incarceration factors under RCW 13.34.180(f) means "'a weighing or balancing of facts, along with a resolution of that weighing." K.J.B., 187 Wn.2d at 603 (quoting In re Parental Rights to M.J., 187 Wn. 2017Consideration of the incarceration factors under RCW 13.34.180(f) means "a weighing or balancing of facts, along with a resolution of that weighing." Id., 387 P.3d at 1078 (quoting In re Parental Rights to M.J., 187 Wn. | 3 | 2017–2019 |
Department of Social & Health Services v. Saint-Louis
green
2 sentences2018In re Dependency of D.L.B., 186 Wn.2d 103, 118 , 376 P.3d 1099 (2016). 2018In re Dependency of D.L.B., 186 Wn.2d 103, 118 , 376 P.3d 1099 (2016). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Washington State Coalition for the Homeless v. Department of Social & Health Services
green
1 sentence2015An appellate court "will not add language to a clear statute." Wash. State Coal. for the Homeless v. Dep 't ofSoc. & Health Servs., 133 Wn.2d 894, 904 , 949 P.2d 1291 (1997). 14 t ,f No. 32938-1-II1 In the Welfare ofRL I• \ t We hold that the additional incarceration factors ofRCW 13.34.180(1)(f) only apply to parents incarcerated at the time of the termination. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Coalition for Homeless v. Dshs
green
1 sentence2015An appellate court "will not add language to a clear statute." Wash. State Coal. for the Homeless v. Dep 't ofSoc. & Health Servs., 133 Wn.2d 894, 904 , 949 P.2d 1291 (1997). 14 t ,f No. 32938-1-II1 In the Welfare ofRL I• \ t We hold that the additional incarceration factors ofRCW 13.34.180(1)(f) only apply to parents incarcerated at the time of the termination. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.