incomplete legal analysis (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

incomplete legal analysis in Washington

7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2011–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Nietogreen
washctapp · 2003 · cited in 3 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2015–2018
2 sentences

2018State v. Nieto, 119 Wn.

2018See Nieto, 119 Wn.

13

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
City of Kennewick v. Day green
wash · 2000
2 sentences

2015City of Kennewick v. Day, 142 Wn.2d 1, 15 , 11 P.3d 304 (2000); Nieto, 119 Wn.

2015City of Kennewick v. Day, 142 Wn.2d 1, 15 , 11 P. 3d 304 ( 2000); Nieto, 119 Wn.

22015–2015
City of Kennewick v. Day green
wash · 2000
2 sentences

2015City of Kennewick v. Day, 142 Wn.2d 1, 15 , 11 P.3d 304 (2000); Nieto, 119 Wn.

2015City of Kennewick v. Day, 142 Wn.2d 1, 15 , 11 P. 3d 304 ( 2000); Nieto, 119 Wn.

22015–2015
Kulman v. Giroux neutral
wash · 2015
1 sentence

2017App. 307, 312 , 345 P.3d 36 , review denied, 184 Wn.2d 1008 (2015). 2.

12017–2017
State v. McComas neutral
washctapp · 2015
2 sentences

2017“If the trial court based its evidentiary ruling on an incomplete legal analysis or a misapprehension of legal issues, the ruling may be an abuse of discretion.” State v. McComas, 186 Wn.

2017App. 307, 312 , 345 P.3d 36 , review denied, 184 Wn.2d 1008 (2015). 2.

12017–2017
State v. Nieto green
washctapp · 2003
1 sentence

2013"If the trial court based its evidentiary ruling on an incomplete legal analysis or a misapprehension of legal issues, the ruling may be an abuse of discretion." Id.

12013–2013
In Re the Recall of Lindquist green
wash · 2011
1 sentence

2013In addition to the previously discussed bases for finding abuse of discretion, Lindquist noted that a trial court also can "abuse[ ] its discretion because its decision was reached by applying an incomplete legal standard." Id. at 142 .

12013–2013
Biggs v. Vail green
wash · 1994
2 sentences

2011Biggs v. Vail, 124 Wash.2d 193, 197 , 876 P.2d 448 (1994).

2011Biggs v. Vail, 124 Wash.2d 193, 197 , 876 P.2d 448 (1994).

12011–2011

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

WA 7 (2011–2018) MS 2 (2019–2022)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check