7 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1973–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. Rhodesgreen2 sentences1973See, e.g., Williams v. *521 Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23 , 21 L.Ed.2d 24 , 89 S.Ct. 5 (1968); Levy v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 68 , 20 L.Ed.2d 436 , 88 S.Ct. 1509 (1968). 1973See, e.g., Williams v. *521 Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23 , 21 L.Ed.2d 24 , 89 S.Ct. 5 (1968); Levy v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 68 , 20 L.Ed.2d 436 , 88 S.Ct. 1509 (1968). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Petstel, Inc. v. County of King
green
2 sentences1998As "[i]t is the function of the judiciary to test legislation against constitutional restrictions," Petstel, Inc. v. King County, 77 Wash.2d 144, 151 , 459 P.2d 937 (1969), each aspect of the text tests the ordinance by a separate and independent constitutional requirement. 1998As "[i]t is the function of the judiciary to test legislation against constitutional restrictions," Petstel, Inc. v. King County, 77 Wash.2d 144, 151 , 459 P.2d 937 (1969), each aspect of the text tests the ordinance by a separate and independent constitutional requirement. | 4 | 1973–2005 |
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Niemi
green
2 sentences1999In Niemi , we reversed a Commission conclusion that dual service as a pro tem judge and as a member of the State Legislature "undermines the public's confidence in the integrity, impartiality and independence of *751 the judiciary in violation of Canons 1 and 2(A)." Niemi, 117 Wash.2d at 820 , 820 P.2d 41 . 1999In Niemi , we reversed a Commission conclusion that dual service as a pro tem judge and as a member of the State Legislature "undermines the public's confidence in the integrity, impartiality and independence of *751 the judiciary in violation of Canons 1 and 2(A)." Niemi, 117 Wash.2d at 820 , 820 P.2d 41 . | 2 | 1999–1999 |
Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity Hospital
green
2 sentences1973See, e.g., Williams v. *521 Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23 , 21 L.Ed.2d 24 , 89 S.Ct. 5 (1968); Levy v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 68 , 20 L.Ed.2d 436 , 88 S.Ct. 1509 (1968). 1973See, e.g., Williams v. *521 Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23 , 21 L.Ed.2d 24 , 89 S.Ct. 5 (1968); Levy v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 68 , 20 L.Ed.2d 436 , 88 S.Ct. 1509 (1968). | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections
green
2 sentences1973It is further demonstrated by examination of numerous opinions of the court which inextricably connect “close scrutiny” by the judiciary only with the requirement that necessary and compelling state interests be shown, rather than merely “legitimate state objectives”. 2 Additionally, Harper v. Virginia Bd. of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 , 16 L. 1973It is further demonstrated by examination of numerous opinions of the court which inextricably connect “close scrutiny” by the judiciary only with the requirement that necessary and compelling state interests be shown, rather than merely “legitimate state objectives”. 2 Additionally, Harper v. Virginia Bd. of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 , 16 L. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.