7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Tracygreen2 sentences2006Id.; see also State v. Tracy, 128 Wn. 2006Id.; see also State v. Tracy, 128 Wash.App. 388, 394-95 , 115 P.3d 381 (2005) (When an appellant fails to meet the burden of providing an adequate record, "the trial court's decision stands") (citing Story v. Shelter Bay Co., 52 Wash.App. 334, 345 , 760 P.2d 368 (1988)), review granted, No. 77534-6 (Wash. Apr. 6, 2006); State v. Firven, 22 Wash.App. 703, 704-05 , 591 P.2d 869 (1979) (RAP 9.6 requires "[t]he party seeking review of a lower court's ruling [to] designat[e] the necessary clerk's papers and exhibits."). ¶ 17 The dissent argues RAP 9.10 compels this court to review Halgren's CR 35 c | 2 | 2 |
State v. Tracygreen1 sentence2006Id.; see also State v. Tracy, 128 Wash.App. 388, 394-95 , 115 P.3d 381 (2005) (When an appellant fails to meet the burden of providing an adequate record, "the trial court's decision stands") (citing Story v. Shelter Bay Co., 52 Wash.App. 334, 345 , 760 P.2d 368 (1988)), review granted, No. 77534-6 (Wash. Apr. 6, 2006); State v. Firven, 22 Wash.App. 703, 704-05 , 591 P.2d 869 (1979) (RAP 9.6 requires "[t]he party seeking review of a lower court's ruling [to] designat[e] the necessary clerk's papers and exhibits."). ¶ 17 The dissent argues RAP 9.10 compels this court to review Halgren's CR 35 c | 1 | 1 |
Story v. Shelter Bay Companygreen2 sentences2006Id.; see also State v. Tracy, 128 Wash.App. 388, 394-95 , 115 P.3d 381 (2005) (When an appellant fails to meet the burden of providing an adequate record, "the trial court's decision stands") (citing Story v. Shelter Bay Co., 52 Wash.App. 334, 345 , 760 P.2d 368 (1988)), review granted, No. 77534-6 (Wash. Apr. 6, 2006); State v. Firven, 22 Wash.App. 703, 704-05 , 591 P.2d 869 (1979) (RAP 9.6 requires "[t]he party seeking review of a lower court's ruling [to] designat[e] the necessary clerk's papers and exhibits."). ¶ 17 The dissent argues RAP 9.10 compels this court to review Halgren's CR 35 c 2006Id.; see also State v. Tracy, 128 Wash.App. 388, 394-95 , 115 P.3d 381 (2005) (When an appellant fails to meet the burden of providing an adequate record, "the trial court's decision stands") (citing Story v. Shelter Bay Co., 52 Wash.App. 334, 345 , 760 P.2d 368 (1988)), review granted, No. 77534-6 (Wash. Apr. 6, 2006); State v. Firven, 22 Wash.App. 703, 704-05 , 591 P.2d 869 (1979) (RAP 9.6 requires "[t]he party seeking review of a lower court's ruling [to] designat[e] the necessary clerk's papers and exhibits."). ¶ 17 The dissent argues RAP 9.10 compels this court to review Halgren's CR 35 c | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wade
green
2 sentences2024But in considering whether a trial court abused its discretion, we must have the complete record of the court’s reasoning. 4 No. 39855-2-III Flewelling v. Flewelling In State v. Wade, 138 Wn.2d 460, 463 , 979 P.2d 850 (1999), our Supreme Court held that Division Two of the Court of Appeals could not properly determine whether the trial court abused its discretion without the record of the evidentiary hearing. 2024Wade, 138 Wn.2d at 466 . | 3 | 2004–2024 |
State v. Wade
green
2 sentences2024But in considering whether a trial court abused its discretion, we must have the complete record of the court’s reasoning. 4 No. 39855-2-III Flewelling v. Flewelling In State v. Wade, 138 Wn.2d 460, 463 , 979 P.2d 850 (1999), our Supreme Court held that Division Two of the Court of Appeals could not properly determine whether the trial court abused its discretion without the record of the evidentiary hearing. 2004State v. Wade, 138 Wn.2d 460, 464 , 979 P.2d 850 (1999). | 3 | 2004–2024 |
Allemeier v. University of Washington
green
2 sentences1999Id.; Allemeier v. University of Washington, 42 Wash.App. 465, 472-73 , 712 P.2d 306 , (1985), review denied, 105 Wash.2d 1014 (1986). 1999Id.; Allemeier v. University of Wash., 42 Wn. | 2 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Firven
neutral
2 sentences2006Id.; see also State v. Tracy, 128 Wash.App. 388, 394-95 , 115 P.3d 381 (2005) (When an appellant fails to meet the burden of providing an adequate record, "the trial court's decision stands") (citing Story v. Shelter Bay Co., 52 Wash.App. 334, 345 , 760 P.2d 368 (1988)), review granted, No. 77534-6 (Wash. Apr. 6, 2006); State v. Firven, 22 Wash.App. 703, 704-05 , 591 P.2d 869 (1979) (RAP 9.6 requires "[t]he party seeking review of a lower court's ruling [to] designat[e] the necessary clerk's papers and exhibits."). ¶ 17 The dissent argues RAP 9.10 compels this court to review Halgren's CR 35 c 2006Id.; see also State v. Tracy, 128 Wash.App. 388, 394-95 , 115 P.3d 381 (2005) (When an appellant fails to meet the burden of providing an adequate record, "the trial court's decision stands") (citing Story v. Shelter Bay Co., 52 Wash.App. 334, 345 , 760 P.2d 368 (1988)), review granted, No. 77534-6 (Wash. Apr. 6, 2006); State v. Firven, 22 Wash.App. 703, 704-05 , 591 P.2d 869 (1979) (RAP 9.6 requires "[t]he party seeking review of a lower court's ruling [to] designat[e] the necessary clerk's papers and exhibits."). ¶ 17 The dissent argues RAP 9.10 compels this court to review Halgren's CR 35 c | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.