7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cutler v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
green
2 sentences2014Cutler, 124 Wn.2d at 755 . 2014Cutler, 124 Wn.2d at 755 . ¶5 In 2009, Kitsap, Pierce, and Mason Counties, along with the cities of Bainbridge Island, Bremerton, Port Orchard, Poulsbo, and Shelton, and the Washington State Patrol and Naval Criminal Investigative Service entered into an Interlocal Agreement, a “cooperative agreement [ ] for their mutual advantage” in fighting drug-related crime. | 4 | 2007–2014 |
Bravo v. Dolsen Companies
green
2 sentences2005They contend that the superior courts erred in dismissing their claims because it was obligated to consider their proffered hypothetical scenarios. ¶32 When entertaining a motion for dismissal for failure to state a claim under CR 12(b)(6), a court should dismiss a claim “only if ‘it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts, consistent with the complaint, which would entitle the plaintiff to relief.’ ” Bravo v. Dolsen Cos., 125 Wn.2d 745, 750 , 888 P.2d 147 (1995) (quoting Haberman v. Wash. Pub. 2005They contend that the superior courts erred in dismissing their claims because it was obligated to consider their proffered hypothetical scenarios. ¶32 When entertaining a motion for dismissal for failure to state a claim under CR 12(b)(6), a court should dismiss a claim “only if ‘it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts, consistent with the complaint, which would entitle the plaintiff to relief.’ ” Bravo v. Dolsen Cos., 125 Wn.2d 745, 750 , 888 P.2d 147 (1995) (quoting Haberman v. Wash. Pub. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply System
green
2 sentences2005They contend that the superior courts erred in dismissing their claims because it was obligated to consider their proffered hypothetical scenarios. ¶ 32 When entertaining a motion for dismissal for failure to state a claim under CR 12(b)(6), a court should dismiss a claim "only if `it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts, consistent with the complaint, which would entitle the plaintiff to relief.'" Bravo v. Dolsen Cos., 125 Wash.2d 745, 750 , 888 P.2d 147 (1995) (quoting Haberman v. WPPSS, 109 Wash.2d 107, 120 , 744 P.2d 1032 , 750 P.2d 254 (1987)). 2005They contend that the superior courts erred in dismissing their claims because it was obligated to consider their proffered hypothetical scenarios. ¶ 32 When entertaining a motion for dismissal for failure to state a claim under CR 12(b)(6), a court should dismiss a claim "only if `it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts, consistent with the complaint, which would entitle the plaintiff to relief.'" Bravo v. Dolsen Cos., 125 Wash.2d 745, 750 , 888 P.2d 147 (1995) (quoting Haberman v. WPPSS, 109 Wash.2d 107, 120 , 744 P.2d 1032 , 750 P.2d 254 (1987)). | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Orwick v. City of Seattle
green
2 sentences1994Hoffer, 110 Wn.2d at 420 (quoting Orwick v. Seattle, 103 Wn.2d 249, 254 , 692 P.2d 793 (1984)). 1994Hoffer, 110 Wn.2d at 420 (quoting Orwick v. Seattle, 103 Wn.2d 249, 254 , 692 P.2d 793 (1984)). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Hoffer v. State
green
1 sentence1994Hoffer, 110 Wn.2d at 420 (quoting Orwick v. Seattle, 103 Wn.2d 249, 254 , 692 P.2d 793 (1984)). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.