defendant and acknowledged defense in Alabama

2014P.: “ ‘In Twyman v. State, 293 Ala. 75, 81-82 , 300 So.2d 124, 130 (1974), our Supreme Court held that ah Ireland [v. State, 47 Ala.App. 65 , 250 So.2d 602 (1971)] form executed by the defendant and acknowledged by defense counsel and the trial judge may establish that a guilty plea was voluntarily -and intelligently made, “provided there is other evidence in the record supporting that fact.” Davis v. State, 348 So.2d. 844, 846 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 348 So.2d 847 (Ala.1977) (emphasis in Twyman).’ Trice v. State, 601 So.2d 180, 184 (Ala.Crim.App.1992) (footnote omitted).” This Court ha

1996Committee Comments, Rule 14.4.” Alford v. State, 651 So.2d 1109, 1112 (Ala.Cr.App.1994); Trice v. State, 601 So.2d 180, 184 (Ala.Cr.App.1992) (“our Supreme Court held that an Ireland form executed by the defendant and acknowledged by defense counsel and the trial judge may establish that a guilty plea was voluntarily and intelligently made, 'provided there is other evidence in the record supporting that fact’ ").

2014P.: “ ‘In Twyman v. State, 293 Ala. 75, 81-82 , 300 So.2d 124, 130 (1974), our Supreme Court held that ah Ireland [v. State, 47 Ala.App. 65 , 250 So.2d 602 (1971)] form executed by the defendant and acknowledged by defense counsel and the trial judge may establish that a guilty plea was voluntarily -and intelligently made, “provided there is other evidence in the record supporting that fact.” Davis v. State, 348 So.2d. 844, 846 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 348 So.2d 847 (Ala.1977) (emphasis in Twyman).’ Trice v. State, 601 So.2d 180, 184 (Ala.Crim.App.1992) (footnote omitted).” This Court ha

2014P.: “ ‘In Twyman v. State, 293 Ala. 75, 81-82 , 300 So.2d 124, 130 (1974), our Supreme Court held that ah Ireland [v. State, 47 Ala.App. 65 , 250 So.2d 602 (1971)] form executed by the defendant and acknowledged by defense counsel and the trial judge may establish that a guilty plea was voluntarily -and intelligently made, “provided there is other evidence in the record supporting that fact.” Davis v. State, 348 So.2d. 844, 846 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 348 So.2d 847 (Ala.1977) (emphasis in Twyman).’ Trice v. State, 601 So.2d 180, 184 (Ala.Crim.App.1992) (footnote omitted).” This Court ha

2000In Twyman v. State , 293 Ala. 75 , 81-82 , 300 So.2d 124 , 130 (1974), the Alabama Supreme Court held that an Ireland form executed by the defendant and acknowledged by defense counsel and the trial judge may establish that a guilty plea was voluntarily and intelligently made, " provided there is other evidence in the record supporting that fact." Davis v. State , 348 So.2d 844 , 846 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 348 So.2d 847 (Ala. 1977) (emphasis in original).

1996Rule 14.4(a)(l)(iv), Ala.R.Crim.P., states that the trial court must inform the accused during the guilty plea colloquy that he or she has “the right to plead not guilty, not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, or both not guilty and not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, and to persist in such a plea if it has already been made, or to plead guilty.” As this court has previously stated: “In Twyman v. State, 293 Ala. 75, 81-82 , 300 So.2d 124, 130 (1974), our Supreme Court held that an Ireland [v. State, 47 Ala.App. 65 , 250 So.2d 602 (1971)] form executed by the defendant

2014The record must reflect sufficient facts from which .such determination could properly be made.’ Dingler v. State, 408 So.2d 530, 532 (Ala.1981).” Brewster v. State, 624 So.2d 217 (Ala.Crim.App.1993).

1996Committee Comments, Rule 14.4.” Alford v. State, 651 So.2d 1109, 1112 (Ala.Cr.App.1994); Trice v. State, 601 So.2d 180, 184 (Ala.Cr.App.1992) (“our Supreme Court held that an Ireland form executed by the defendant and acknowledged by defense counsel and the trial judge may establish that a guilty plea was voluntarily and intelligently made, 'provided there is other evidence in the record supporting that fact’ ").

1992See McNalley v. State , 468 So.2d at 213 .