6 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 2010–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Benuishis v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the Stategreen2 sentences2012Claim Appeals Office, 195 P.3d 1142 , 1146 (Colo.App.2008) (applying doctrine of noscitur a sociis, meaning that an unclear phrase should be determined from the words immediately surrounding it). ¶ 35 A natural person is not a corporation, partnership, estate, or trust. 2010Benuishis v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 195 P.3d 1142, 1146 (Colo.App.2008) (applying doctrine of noscitur a sociis, meaning that an unclear phrase should be determined from the words immediately surrounding it). | 1 | 2 |
Bedford v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2014In section 12-36.5-104(10)(a) "subpoena" must be read with "records." See Bedford v. Johnson, 102 Colo. 203 , 78 P.2d 373, 376 (1938) (applying the doctrine of noscitur a sociis, which requires the meaning of words to be ascertained by those with which they are associated). 2014In section 12-36.5-104(10)(a) "subpoena" must be read with "records." See Bedford v. Johnson, 102 Colo. 203 , 78 P.2d 373, 376 (1938) (applying the doctrine of noscitur a sociis, which requires the meaning of words to be ascertained by those with which they are associated). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Gordon
green
2 sentences2021The division also conducted a noscitur a sociis analysis, concluding that "take" requires a mental state of knowingly because it appears in series with other conduct that implies knowledge: "hunt, take, or have in such person's possession." Id. at ¶¶ 23–24 ( quoting § 33-6-109 (1) ) . 2021The division also conducted a noscitur a sociis analysis, concluding that “take” requires a mental state of knowingly because it appears in series with other conduct that implies knowledge: “hunt, take, or have 12 in such person’s possession.” Id. at ¶¶ 23–24 (quoting § 33-6-109(1)). | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Department of Transportation, State of Colorado v. Amerco Real Estate Co
green
1 sentence2024Id. ¶ 22 Under the doctrine of noscitur a sociis, a word or phrase is known by the company it keeps. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.