case to file any exception (District of Columbia) · Go Syfert
← District of Columbia issues

case to file any exception in District of Columbia

6 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2008 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re Goldsboroughgreen
dc · 1995 · cited in 6 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 1999–2008
2 sentences

2008In re Goldsborough, 654 A.2d 1285 (D.C.1995); see also In re Richardson, 935 A.2d 1076, 1078 (D.C.2007) (“New Jersey law requires that when a respondent has been suspended from the practice of law, she is required to file a petition for reinstatement establishing fitness to resume practice of law; therefore, in keeping with the imposition of identical discipline, the Board recommends that a fitness requirement also be imposed here.”) (footnote omitted); In re Cater, 887 A.2d 1, 12 (D.C.2005) (requiring “clear and convincing evidence that casts a serious doubt upon the attorney’s continuing fit

2005In re Goldsborough, 654 A.2d 1285 (D.C.1995). 2 Accordingly, it is *995 ORDERED that in 03-BG-1090, Steven M.

16
In Re Childressgreen
dc · 2002 · cited in 3 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003E.g., In re Childress, 811 A.2d 805 (D.C.2002); In re Goldsborough, 654 A.2d 1285 (D.C.1995); see also D.C.

2003In re Childress, 811 A.2d 805 (D.C.2002); In re Goldsborough, 654 A.2d 1285 (D.C. 1995); see also D.C.

13
In Re Catergreen
dc · 2005 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
1 sentence

2008In re Goldsborough, 654 A.2d 1285 (D.C.1995); see also In re Richardson, 935 A.2d 1076, 1078 (D.C.2007) (“New Jersey law requires that when a respondent has been suspended from the practice of law, she is required to file a petition for reinstatement establishing fitness to resume practice of law; therefore, in keeping with the imposition of identical discipline, the Board recommends that a fitness requirement also be imposed here.”) (footnote omitted); In re Cater, 887 A.2d 1, 12 (D.C.2005) (requiring “clear and convincing evidence that casts a serious doubt upon the attorney’s continuing fit

11
In Re Richardsongreen
dc · 2007 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
1 sentence

2008In re Goldsborough, 654 A.2d 1285 (D.C.1995); see also In re Richardson, 935 A.2d 1076, 1078 (D.C.2007) (“New Jersey law requires that when a respondent has been suspended from the practice of law, she is required to file a petition for reinstatement establishing fitness to resume practice of law; therefore, in keeping with the imposition of identical discipline, the Board recommends that a fitness requirement also be imposed here.”) (footnote omitted); In re Cater, 887 A.2d 1, 12 (D.C.2005) (requiring “clear and convincing evidence that casts a serious doubt upon the attorney’s continuing fit

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check