6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
English v. McCrarygreen2 sentences2016Weekly D1726 , D1726 (Fla. 2d DCA July 24, 2015) (citing English v. McCrary, 348 So. 2d 293, 296 (Fla. 1977)). -7- holding the Baker Act hearing. 2016Weekly D1726 , D1726 (Fla. 2d DCA July 24, 2015) (citing English v. McCrary, 348 So. 2d 293, 296 (Fla. 1977)). -7- holding the Baker Act hearing. | 1 | 1 |
Linn v. Stategreen2 sentences2016The hearing, often referred to as a Baker Act hearing, must be held within five working days following the filing of the petition. § 394.467(6)(a)(1); see In re Involuntary Placement of Linn, 79 So. 3d 783, 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). 2016The hearing, often referred to as a Baker Act hearing, must be held within five working days following the filing of the petition. § 394.467(6)(a)(1); see In re Involuntary Placement of Linn, 79 So. 3d 783, 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). | 1 | 1 |
MW v. Davisgreen2 sentences2000See M.W., 722 So.2d at 968-69. 2000See M.W., 722 So.2d at 968-69. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mouliom v. Northeast Florida State Hospital
green
2 sentences2020Id. 23 In contrast to Doe, the proposed remote conduct of a probation violation hearing in the instant case is a temporary procedure, and a reasonable one crafted in response to the current necessities of a public health emergency. 2020Id. 23 In contrast to Doe, the proposed remote conduct of a probation violation hearing in the instant case is a temporary procedure, and a reasonable one crafted in response to the current necessities of a public health emergency. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
In Re Beverly
green
2 sentences2017“The gravity of the matters considered at a Baker Act hearing requires the trial court to conduct the proceedings in a fair and neutral manner.” Id. 2017“The gravity of the matters considered at a Baker Act hearing requires the trial court to conduct the proceedings in a fair and neutral manner.” Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Doe v. State
green
2 sentences2017It is this new procedure that the petitioners challenge, asking this court to require the judicial officers to be physically present for the hearings “as required by law.” Id. at 156 . (majority) Ultimately, the Second District held: In sum, while we question the wisdom of holding these hearings remotely, we conclude that the decision to preside over a Baker Act hearing remotely via videoconference equipment is within the discretion of the court. 2017It is this new procedure that the petitioners challenge, asking this court to require the judicial officers to be physically present for the hearings “as required by law.” Id. at 156 . (majority) Ultimately, the Second District held: In sum, while we question the wisdom of holding these hearings remotely, we conclude that the decision to preside over a Baker Act hearing remotely via videoconference equipment is within the discretion of the court. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Shuman v. State
green
2 sentences2017Moreover, “[t]hose whom the state seeks to involuntarily commit to a mental institution are entitled to the protection of our Constitutions, as are those incarcerated in our correctional institutions.” Shuman, 358 So. 2d at 1335 . 2017Moreover, “[t]hose whom the state seeks to involuntarily commit to a mental institution are entitled to the protection of our Constitutions, as are those incarcerated in our correctional institutions.” Shuman, 358 So. 2d at 1335 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc.
green
2 sentences1990Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc., 531 So.2d 113 (Fla. 1988). 1990Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc., 531 So.2d 113 (Fla. 1988). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
In Re Connors
green
2 sentences1978The Supreme Court, having held in Powell and in pre-Baker Act decisions that Rule 3.460 grants the committing court "continuing jurisdiction ... to determine by subsequent hearing and order whether defendant [is] still manifestly dangerous to the public," 306 So.2d at 116, [12] stated in Connors that petitions for reexamination and release would be determined first and finally, not by a Baker Act hearing examiner, but by the committing court, and not according to a statutory timetable, but rather "at reasonably separated period intervals or on the suggestion of the custodial official." 332 So. 1978The Supreme Court, having held in Powell and in pre-Baker Act decisions that Rule 3.460 grants the committing court "continuing jurisdiction ... to determine by subsequent hearing and order whether defendant [is] still manifestly dangerous to the public," 306 So.2d at 116, [12] stated in Connors that petitions for reexamination and release would be determined first and finally, not by a Baker Act hearing examiner, but by the committing court, and not according to a statutory timetable, but rather "at reasonably separated period intervals or on the suggestion of the custodial official." 332 So. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.