issuance of a curative instruction in Florida

6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (13)

Case	Followed	Cited
Chamberlain v. Stategreen fla · 2004 · cited in 4 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2008–2025 2 sentences 2025In any event, based on the prosecutor’s remarks at the original penalty phase, Fletcher filed a “Motion in Limine to Preclude Improper Closing Argument.” The motion was granted in an order stating in relevant part: “There should be no denigration of the Defendant’s case.” - 20 - necessary to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial.” See Chamberlain v. State, 881 So. 2d 1087, 1098 (Fla. 2004) (citing Rivera v. State, 859 So. 2d 495, 512 (Fla. 2003)). “[W]hen an improper comment is made, objected to by counsel, and sustained by the trial court and corrected by the issuance of a curative 2025In any event, based on the prosecutor’s remarks at the original penalty phase, Fletcher filed a “Motion in Limine to Preclude Improper Closing Argument.” The motion was granted in an order stating in relevant part: “There should be no denigration of the Defendant’s case.” - 20 - necessary to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial.” See Chamberlain v. State, 881 So. 2d 1087, 1098 (Fla. 2004) (citing Rivera v. State, 859 So. 2d 495, 512 (Fla. 2003)). “[W]hen an improper comment is made, objected to by counsel, and sustained by the trial court and corrected by the issuance of a curative	3	4
Rivera v. Stategreen fla · 2003 · cited in 4 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2008–2025 2 sentences 2025In any event, based on the prosecutor’s remarks at the original penalty phase, Fletcher filed a “Motion in Limine to Preclude Improper Closing Argument.” The motion was granted in an order stating in relevant part: “There should be no denigration of the Defendant’s case.” - 20 - necessary to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial.” See Chamberlain v. State, 881 So. 2d 1087, 1098 (Fla. 2004) (citing Rivera v. State, 859 So. 2d 495, 512 (Fla. 2003)). “[W]hen an improper comment is made, objected to by counsel, and sustained by the trial court and corrected by the issuance of a curative 2025In any event, based on the prosecutor’s remarks at the original penalty phase, Fletcher filed a “Motion in Limine to Preclude Improper Closing Argument.” The motion was granted in an order stating in relevant part: “There should be no denigration of the Defendant’s case.” - 20 - necessary to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial.” See Chamberlain v. State, 881 So. 2d 1087, 1098 (Fla. 2004) (citing Rivera v. State, 859 So. 2d 495, 512 (Fla. 2003)). “[W]hen an improper comment is made, objected to by counsel, and sustained by the trial court and corrected by the issuance of a curative	3	4
Rafael Andres v. State of Floridagreen fla · 2018 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025 2 sentences 2025In any event, based on the prosecutor’s remarks at the original penalty phase, Fletcher filed a “Motion in Limine to Preclude Improper Closing Argument.” The motion was granted in an order stating in relevant part: “There should be no denigration of the Defendant’s case.” - 20 - necessary to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial.” See Chamberlain v. State, 881 So. 2d 1087, 1098 (Fla. 2004) (citing Rivera v. State, 859 So. 2d 495, 512 (Fla. 2003)). “[W]hen an improper comment is made, objected to by counsel, and sustained by the trial court and corrected by the issuance of a curative 2025In any event, based on the prosecutor’s remarks at the original penalty phase, Fletcher filed a “Motion in Limine to Preclude Improper Closing Argument.” The motion was granted in an order stating in relevant part: “There should be no denigration of the Defendant’s case.” - 20 - necessary to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial.” See Chamberlain v. State, 881 So. 2d 1087, 1098 (Fla. 2004) (citing Rivera v. State, 859 So. 2d 495, 512 (Fla. 2003)). “[W]hen an improper comment is made, objected to by counsel, and sustained by the trial court and corrected by the issuance of a curative	2	2
Anderson v. Stategreen fla · 2003 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2008–2018 2 sentences 2018Chamberlain v. State , 881 So.2d 1087 , 1098 (Fla. 2004) ; Rivera v. State , 859 So.2d 495 , 512 (Fla. 2003) ; Anderson v. State , 841 So.2d 390 , 403 (Fla. 2003). 2008Chamberlain v. State, 881 So.2d 1087, 1098 (Fla.2004); Rivera v. State, 859 So.2d 495, 511-12 (Fla.2003); Anderson v. State, 841 So.2d 390, 403 (Fla.2003); Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 956-57 (Fla.2003); Smithers v. State, 826 So.2d 916, 930 (Fla. 2002); Card v. State, 803 So.2d 613, 621-22 (Fla.2001); Gore v. State, 784 So.2d 418, 427-28 (Fla.2001); Rodriguez v. State, 753 So.2d 29, 39 (Fla.2000); Goodwin, 751 So.2d at 547 .	1	2
Doorbal v. Stategreen fla · 2003 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 1 sentence 2008Chamberlain v. State, 881 So.2d 1087, 1098 (Fla.2004); Rivera v. State, 859 So.2d 495, 511-12 (Fla.2003); Anderson v. State, 841 So.2d 390, 403 (Fla.2003); Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 956-57 (Fla.2003); Smithers v. State, 826 So.2d 916, 930 (Fla. 2002); Card v. State, 803 So.2d 613, 621-22 (Fla.2001); Gore v. State, 784 So.2d 418, 427-28 (Fla.2001); Rodriguez v. State, 753 So.2d 29, 39 (Fla.2000); Goodwin, 751 So.2d at 547 .	1	1
Gore v. Stategreen fla · 2001 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 1 sentence 2008Chamberlain v. State, 881 So.2d 1087, 1098 (Fla.2004); Rivera v. State, 859 So.2d 495, 511-12 (Fla.2003); Anderson v. State, 841 So.2d 390, 403 (Fla.2003); Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 956-57 (Fla.2003); Smithers v. State, 826 So.2d 916, 930 (Fla. 2002); Card v. State, 803 So.2d 613, 621-22 (Fla.2001); Gore v. State, 784 So.2d 418, 427-28 (Fla.2001); Rodriguez v. State, 753 So.2d 29, 39 (Fla.2000); Goodwin, 751 So.2d at 547 .	1	1
Smithers v. Stategreen fla · 2002 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 1 sentence 2008Chamberlain v. State, 881 So.2d 1087, 1098 (Fla.2004); Rivera v. State, 859 So.2d 495, 511-12 (Fla.2003); Anderson v. State, 841 So.2d 390, 403 (Fla.2003); Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 956-57 (Fla.2003); Smithers v. State, 826 So.2d 916, 930 (Fla. 2002); Card v. State, 803 So.2d 613, 621-22 (Fla.2001); Gore v. State, 784 So.2d 418, 427-28 (Fla.2001); Rodriguez v. State, 753 So.2d 29, 39 (Fla.2000); Goodwin, 751 So.2d at 547 .	1	1
Rodriguez v. Stategreen fla · 2000 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 1 sentence 2008Chamberlain v. State, 881 So.2d 1087, 1098 (Fla.2004); Rivera v. State, 859 So.2d 495, 511-12 (Fla.2003); Anderson v. State, 841 So.2d 390, 403 (Fla.2003); Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 956-57 (Fla.2003); Smithers v. State, 826 So.2d 916, 930 (Fla. 2002); Card v. State, 803 So.2d 613, 621-22 (Fla.2001); Gore v. State, 784 So.2d 418, 427-28 (Fla.2001); Rodriguez v. State, 753 So.2d 29, 39 (Fla.2000); Goodwin, 751 So.2d at 547 .	1	1
Card v. Stategreen fla · 2001 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 1 sentence 2008Chamberlain v. State, 881 So.2d 1087, 1098 (Fla.2004); Rivera v. State, 859 So.2d 495, 511-12 (Fla.2003); Anderson v. State, 841 So.2d 390, 403 (Fla.2003); Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 956-57 (Fla.2003); Smithers v. State, 826 So.2d 916, 930 (Fla. 2002); Card v. State, 803 So.2d 613, 621-22 (Fla.2001); Gore v. State, 784 So.2d 418, 427-28 (Fla.2001); Rodriguez v. State, 753 So.2d 29, 39 (Fla.2000); Goodwin, 751 So.2d at 547 .	1	1
Webber v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 1998 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001 1 sentence 2001Walker v. State, 707 So.2d 300, 313 (Fla.1997) (holding the admission of testimony which referenced other charges was harmless error in light of trial court’s curative instruction); Webber v. State, 718 So.2d 258, 259 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (holding that improper testimony of evidence of collateral crimes constituted harmless error where the trial court issued curative instruction); Marshall v. State, 439 So.2d 973, 974 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1983) (holding that curative instruction corrected any prejudice created by testimony that the defendant’s fingerprints matched the fingerprints taken from the files	1	1
Walker v. Stategreen fla · 1997 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001 1 sentence 2001Walker v. State, 707 So.2d 300, 313 (Fla.1997) (holding the admission of testimony which referenced other charges was harmless error in light of trial court’s curative instruction); Webber v. State, 718 So.2d 258, 259 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (holding that improper testimony of evidence of collateral crimes constituted harmless error where the trial court issued curative instruction); Marshall v. State, 439 So.2d 973, 974 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1983) (holding that curative instruction corrected any prejudice created by testimony that the defendant’s fingerprints matched the fingerprints taken from the files	1	1
Marshall v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 1983 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001 1 sentence 2001Walker v. State, 707 So.2d 300, 313 (Fla.1997) (holding the admission of testimony which referenced other charges was harmless error in light of trial court’s curative instruction); Webber v. State, 718 So.2d 258, 259 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (holding that improper testimony of evidence of collateral crimes constituted harmless error where the trial court issued curative instruction); Marshall v. State, 439 So.2d 973, 974 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1983) (holding that curative instruction corrected any prejudice created by testimony that the defendant’s fingerprints matched the fingerprints taken from the files	1	1
Finklea v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 1985 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999 1 sentence 1999See Finklea v. State, 471 So.2d 596, 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

Case	Cited	Years
Goodwin v. State green fla · 1999 1 sentence 2008Chamberlain v. State, 881 So.2d 1087, 1098 (Fla.2004); Rivera v. State, 859 So.2d 495, 511-12 (Fla.2003); Anderson v. State, 841 So.2d 390, 403 (Fla.2003); Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 956-57 (Fla.2003); Smithers v. State, 826 So.2d 916, 930 (Fla. 2002); Card v. State, 803 So.2d 613, 621-22 (Fla.2001); Gore v. State, 784 So.2d 418, 427-28 (Fla.2001); Rodriguez v. State, 753 So.2d 29, 39 (Fla.2000); Goodwin, 751 So.2d at 547 .	1	2008–2008
Williams v. State neutral fladistctapp · 1978 1 sentence 2001Walker v. State, 707 So.2d 300, 313 (Fla.1997) (holding the admission of testimony which referenced other charges was harmless error in light of trial court’s curative instruction); Webber v. State, 718 So.2d 258, 259 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (holding that improper testimony of evidence of collateral crimes constituted harmless error where the trial court issued curative instruction); Marshall v. State, 439 So.2d 973, 974 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1983) (holding that curative instruction corrected any prejudice created by testimony that the defendant’s fingerprints matched the fingerprints taken from the files	1	2001–2001

Where else courts name it

FL 6 (1999–2025) MI 2 (2016–2016) OH 2 (2001–2012) ND 2 (2008–2008)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check