particularized need test (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

particularized need test in Florida

6 Florida opinions name it 3 courts 1974–2006 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Rogers v. Stategreen
fla · 2001 · cited in 3 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2002–2006
2 sentences

2006Id. at 999 .

2002We have previously stated: "A trial court's decision to deny a defendant's motion for a PET-Scan will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion." Rogers v. State, 783 So.2d 980, 998-99 (Fla.2001) (holding that when considering whether the trial court abused its discretion, this Court should consider the following two factors: (1) if the defendant established a particularized need for the test; and (2) if the defendant was prejudiced by the trial court's denial of the motion requesting a PET-scan).

23
Robinson v. Stategreen
fla · 1999 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2001–2004
2 sentences

2004Cf. San Martin, 705 So.2d at 1347 ; see also Robinson, 761 So.2d at 275 ; Hoskins, 702 So.2d at 209 .

2001Cf. San Martin, 705 So.2d at 1347 ; see also Robinson, 761 So.2d at 275 ; Hoskins, 702 So.2d at 209 .

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Hoskins v. State green
fla · 1997
2 sentences

2004Cf. San Martin, 705 So.2d at 1347 ; see also Robinson, 761 So.2d at 275 ; Hoskins, 702 So.2d at 209 .

2001Cf. San Martin, 705 So.2d at 1347 ; see also Robinson, 761 So.2d at 275 ; Hoskins, 702 So.2d at 209 .

22001–2004
San Martin v. State green
fla · 1997
2 sentences

2004Cf. San Martin, 705 So.2d at 1347 ; see also Robinson, 761 So.2d at 275 ; Hoskins, 702 So.2d at 209 .

2001Cf. San Martin, 705 So.2d at 1347 ; see also Robinson, 761 So.2d at 275 ; Hoskins, 702 So.2d at 209 .

22001–2004
United States v. Projansky green
nysd · 1968
1 sentence

1974United States v. Projansky, 44 F.R.D. 550 (S.D.N.Y. 1968).

11974–1974

Statutes the citing opinions construe

FL § 921.141 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OH 8 (1981–2024) NY 7 (2005–2024) FL 6 (1974–2006) MD 2 (1989–1998) NJ 2 (1989–1991) AL 2 (1993–1993)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check