plea agreement violation (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

plea agreement violation in Florida

6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2022 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Lawson v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022See Grimes v. State, 754 So. 2d 86, 87 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (“[F]ailure of the Department of Corrections to award the proper gain time does not make the underlying sentence ‘illegal’ within the meaning of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) . . . .”). 3 agreement, he is entitled to 162 days of additional credit for gain time previously awarded, as a “forfeiture [of gain time] cannot thwart the terms contemplated in a plea agreement.” See Dellofano v. State, 946 So. 2d 127, 129 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (“Dellofano’s motion was filed under oath and within the deadline for filing a rule 3.850 m

11
Dellofano v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 2007 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022See Grimes v. State, 754 So. 2d 86, 87 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (“[F]ailure of the Department of Corrections to award the proper gain time does not make the underlying sentence ‘illegal’ within the meaning of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) . . . .”). 3 agreement, he is entitled to 162 days of additional credit for gain time previously awarded, as a “forfeiture [of gain time] cannot thwart the terms contemplated in a plea agreement.” See Dellofano v. State, 946 So. 2d 127, 129 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (“Dellofano’s motion was filed under oath and within the deadline for filing a rule 3.850 m

11
Cozza v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
1 sentence

2010Cozza v. State, 756 So.2d 272, 273 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

11
Tillman v. Stategreen
fla · 1988 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
1 sentence

2009See Santobello, 404 U.S. at 259 , 92 S.Ct. 495 ; Tillman, 522 So.2d at 16.

11
Santobello v. New Yorkgreen
scotus · 1971 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
2 sentences

2009See Santobello, 404 U.S. at 259 , 92 S.Ct. 495 ; Tillman, 522 So.2d at 16.

2009See Santobello, 404 U.S. at 259 , 92 S.Ct. 495 ; Tillman, 522 So.2d at 16.

11
Buckingham v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
1 sentence

2001See Buckingham v. State, 771 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Osteen v. State green
fladistctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2011Id. at 899 .

12011–2011
Bover v. State green
fla · 2001
1 sentence

2003Id. at 1251 n. 7.

12003–2003

Where else courts name it

TX 19 (2006–2024) CA 14 (1996–2025) WA 12 (1988–2018) NY 9 (2011–2019) TN 7 (1998–2024) IA 6 (1999–2020) FL 6 (2001–2022) IL 6 (2007–2016) PA 5 (2000–2021) OH 5 (2003–2025) KY 5 (2003–2023) CO 4 (1993–2025) IN 4 (2004–2018) CT 4 (1996–2019) WI 4 (1994–2014) SC 3 (1994–2015) MO 3 (2011–2022) OR 2 (1996–2020) WV 2 (1998–2013) MD 2 (2019–2021) NM 2 (2002–2009) ID 2 (2006–2013) KS 2 (2020–2026) LA 2 (2010–2018)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check