primacy doctrine (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

primacy doctrine in Florida

6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1992–1995 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Traylor v. Stategreen
fla · 1992 · cited in 6 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1992–1995
2 sentences

1993Whereas one conceivably could be motivated to lie about his birthdate, the order of the alphabet is not susceptible to prevarication or alteration for ulterior motive." Id. at 729-30 . [8] We begin our analysis with the Florida Constitution's Declaration of Rights, consonant with the primacy principle explained in Traylor v. State, 596 So.2d 957 (Fla. 1992).

1992In the recent case of Traylor v. State, 1992 WL 4873 , No. 70,051 (Fla. Jan. 16, 1992), Chief Justice Shaw joined in relevant part by five other members of this Court recognized the existence of the doctrine of primacy.

26
Herrera v. Stategreen
fla · 1992 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992Traylor v. State, 596 So.2d 957 (Fla. 1992); see also Herrera v. State, 594 So.2d 275 (Fla.1992) (Kogan, J., concurring).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Doe v. United States green
scotus · 1988
1 sentence

1993Whereas one conceivably could be motivated to lie about his birthdate, the order of the alphabet is not susceptible to prevarication or alteration for ulterior motive." Id. at 729-30 . [8] We begin our analysis with the Florida Constitution's Declaration of Rights, consonant with the primacy principle explained in Traylor v. State, 596 So.2d 957 (Fla. 1992).

11993–1993

Where else courts name it

FL 6 (1992–1995) CO 6 (1994–2009) TX 2 (2023–2025) UT 2 (2013–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check