6 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 2011–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
AAF-McQuay, Inc. v. Willisgreen2 sentences2013See Moses v. Jordan, 319 Ga. App. 706, 706 ( 738 SE2d 297 ) (2013) (“the gravamen of a wrongful dissolution claim is a partner’s attempt to appropriate, through the dissolution, the assets or business of the partnership, which may include prospective business, without adequate compensation to the remaining partners”) (citation and punctuation omitted); AAFMcQuay, Inc. v. Willis, 308 Ga. App. 203, 211 (1) (c) ( 707 SE2d 508 ) (2011) (“Partners owe fiduciary duties to one another to act in the ‘utmost good faith’ and with the ‘finest loyalty.’ ”) (citation and punctuation omitted). 14 Accordingl 2013See Moses v. Jordan, 319 Ga. App. 706, 706 ( 738 SE2d 297 ) (2013) (“the gravamen of a wrongful dissolution claim is a partner’s attempt to appropriate, through the dissolution, the assets or business of the partnership, which may include prospective business, without adequate compensation to the remaining partners”) (citation and punctuation omitted); AAFMcQuay, Inc. v. Willis, 308 Ga. App. 203, 211 (1) (c) ( 707 SE2d 508 ) (2011) (“Partners owe fiduciary duties to one another to act in the ‘utmost good faith’ and with the ‘finest loyalty.’ ”) (citation and punctuation omitted). 14 Accordingl | 2 | 2 |
Moses v. Jordangreen2 sentences2013See Moses v. Jordan, 319 Ga. App. 706, 706 ( 738 SE2d 297 ) (2013) (“the gravamen of a wrongful dissolution claim is a partner’s attempt to appropriate, through the dissolution, the assets or business of the partnership, which may include prospective business, without adequate compensation to the remaining partners”) (citation and punctuation omitted); AAFMcQuay, Inc. v. Willis, 308 Ga. App. 203, 211 (1) (c) ( 707 SE2d 508 ) (2011) (“Partners owe fiduciary duties to one another to act in the ‘utmost good faith’ and with the ‘finest loyalty.’ ”) (citation and punctuation omitted). 14 Accordingl 2013See Moses v. Jordan, 319 Ga. App. 706, 706 ( 738 SE2d 297 ) (2013) (“the gravamen of a wrongful dissolution claim is a partner’s attempt to appropriate, through the dissolution, the assets or business of the partnership, which may include prospective business, without adequate compensation to the remaining partners”) (citation and punctuation omitted); AAFMcQuay, Inc. v. Willis, 308 Ga. App. 203, 211 (1) (c) ( 707 SE2d 508 ) (2011) (“Partners owe fiduciary duties to one another to act in the ‘utmost good faith’ and with the ‘finest loyalty.’ ”) (citation and punctuation omitted). 14 Accordingl | 2 | 2 |
Wilensky v. Blalockgreen2 sentences2013In Jordan v. Moses, 291 Ga. 39 ( 727 SE2d 460 ) (2012), the Supreme Court reversed our decision in Division 1 on the ground that we included in our recitation of the applicable law the phrase “the new prosperity of the partnership” from our opinion in Arford v. Blalock, 199 Ga. App. 434 ( 405 SE2d 698 ) (1991), rather than the Supreme Court’s subsequent formulation of the standard as “the prosperity of the partnership” in Wilensky v. Blalock, 262 Ga. 95 ( 414 SE2d 1 ) (1992).* 1 The Supreme Court held that “[t]he gravamen of a wrongful dissolution claim is a partner’s attempt to appropriate, t 2013In Jordan v. Moses, 291 Ga. 39 ( 727 SE2d 460 ) (2012), the Supreme Court reversed our decision in Division 1 on the ground that we included in our recitation of the applicable law the phrase “the new prosperity of the partnership” from our opinion in Arford v. Blalock, 199 Ga. App. 434 ( 405 SE2d 698 ) (1991), rather than the Supreme Court’s subsequent formulation of the standard as “the prosperity of the partnership” in Wilensky v. Blalock, 262 Ga. 95 ( 414 SE2d 1 ) (1992).* 1 The Supreme Court held that “[t]he gravamen of a wrongful dissolution claim is a partner’s attempt to appropriate, t | 1 | 3 |
Asgharneya v. Hadavigreen2 sentences2012See Moses, supra; Asgharneya, supra at 697 (4), 680 S.E.2d 866 (2009); Arford, supra. The gravamen of a wrongful dissolution claim is a partner's attempt to appropriate, through the dissolution, the assets or business of the partnership, which may include prospective business, without adequate compensation to the remaining partners. 2012See Moses, supra; Asgharneya, supra at 697 (4); Arford, supra. The gravamen of a wrongful dissolution claim is a partner’s attempt to appropriate, through the dissolution, the assets or business of the partnership, which may include prospective business, without adequate compensation to the remaining partners. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Arford v. Blalock
green
2 sentences2013In Jordan v. Moses, 291 Ga. 39 ( 727 SE2d 460 ) (2012), the Supreme Court reversed our decision in Division 1 on the ground that we included in our recitation of the applicable law the phrase “the new prosperity of the partnership” from our opinion in Arford v. Blalock, 199 Ga. App. 434 ( 405 SE2d 698 ) (1991), rather than the Supreme Court’s subsequent formulation of the standard as “the prosperity of the partnership” in Wilensky v. Blalock, 262 Ga. 95 ( 414 SE2d 1 ) (1992).* 1 The Supreme Court held that “[t]he gravamen of a wrongful dissolution claim is a partner’s attempt to appropriate, t 2013In Jordan v. Moses, 291 Ga. 39 ( 727 SE2d 460 ) (2012), the Supreme Court reversed our decision in Division 1 on the ground that we included in our recitation of the applicable law the phrase “the new prosperity of the partnership” from our opinion in Arford v. Blalock, 199 Ga. App. 434 ( 405 SE2d 698 ) (1991), rather than the Supreme Court’s subsequent formulation of the standard as “the prosperity of the partnership” in Wilensky v. Blalock, 262 Ga. 95 ( 414 SE2d 1 ) (1992).* 1 The Supreme Court held that “[t]he gravamen of a wrongful dissolution claim is a partner’s attempt to appropriate, t | 3 | 2011–2013 |
Jordan v. Moses
green
2 sentences2013In Jordan v. Moses, 291 Ga. 39 ( 727 SE2d 460 ) (2012), the Supreme Court reversed our decision in Division 1 on the ground that we included in our recitation of the applicable law the phrase “the new prosperity of the partnership” from our opinion in Arford v. Blalock, 199 Ga. App. 434 ( 405 SE2d 698 ) (1991), rather than the Supreme Court’s subsequent formulation of the standard as “the prosperity of the partnership” in Wilensky v. Blalock, 262 Ga. 95 ( 414 SE2d 1 ) (1992).* 1 The Supreme Court held that “[t]he gravamen of a wrongful dissolution claim is a partner’s attempt to appropriate, t 2013In Jordan v. Moses, 291 Ga. 39 ( 727 SE2d 460 ) (2012), the Supreme Court reversed our decision in Division 1 on the ground that we included in our recitation of the applicable law the phrase “the new prosperity of the partnership” from our opinion in Arford v. Blalock, 199 Ga. App. 434 ( 405 SE2d 698 ) (1991), rather than the Supreme Court’s subsequent formulation of the standard as “the prosperity of the partnership” in Wilensky v. Blalock, 262 Ga. 95 ( 414 SE2d 1 ) (1992).* 1 The Supreme Court held that “[t]he gravamen of a wrongful dissolution claim is a partner’s attempt to appropriate, t | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Moses v. Jordan
green
1 sentence2012Stated differently, the power to dissolve must be exercised in good faith." Moses, supra at 641, 714 S.E.2d 262 (Citation and punctuation omitted.). | 1 | 2012–2012 |