6 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hansengreen2 sentences2023State v. Hansen, 133 Idaho 323, 328 , 986 P.2d 346, 351 (1999). 2023State v. Hansen, 133 Idaho 323, 328 , 986 P.2d 346, 351 (1999). | 5 | 5 |
State v. Kodeshgreen2 sentences1999A defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on every defense or theory of defense having any support in the evidence, State v. Kodesh, 122 Idaho 756, 758 , 838 P.2d 885, 887 (Ct.App.1992); State v. Evans, 119 Idaho 383 , 807 P.2d 62 (Ct.App.1991); State v. Mason, 111 Idaho 660, 669 , 726 P.2d 772, 781 (Ct.App.1986); State v. Pennell, 108 Idaho 669 , 701 P.2d 289 (Ct.App.1985), including, of course, the law of self-defense. 1999A defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on every defense or theory of defense having any support in the evidence, State v. Kodesh, 122 Idaho 756, 758 , 838 P.2d 885, 887 (Ct.App.1992); State v. Evans, 119 Idaho 383 , 807 P.2d 62 (Ct.App.1991); State v. Mason, 111 Idaho 660, 669 , 726 P.2d 772, 781 (Ct.App.1986); State v. Pennell, 108 Idaho 669 , 701 P.2d 289 (Ct.App.1985), including, of course, the law of self-defense. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Masongreen2 sentences1999A defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on every defense or theory of defense having any support in the evidence, State v. Kodesh, 122 Idaho 756, 758 , 838 P.2d 885, 887 (Ct.App.1992); State v. Evans, 119 Idaho 383 , 807 P.2d 62 (Ct.App.1991); State v. Mason, 111 Idaho 660, 669 , 726 P.2d 772, 781 (Ct.App.1986); State v. Pennell, 108 Idaho 669 , 701 P.2d 289 (Ct.App.1985), including, of course, the law of self-defense. 1999A defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on every defense or theory of defense having any support in the evidence, State v. Kodesh, 122 Idaho 756, 758 , 838 P.2d 885, 887 (Ct.App.1992); State v. Evans, 119 Idaho 383 , 807 P.2d 62 (Ct.App.1991); State v. Mason, 111 Idaho 660, 669 , 726 P.2d 772, 781 (Ct.App.1986); State v. Pennell, 108 Idaho 669 , 701 P.2d 289 (Ct.App.1985), including, of course, the law of self-defense. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Spurrgreen2 sentences1999State v. Allen, 113 Idaho 676, 679 , 747 P.2d 85, 88 (Ct.App.1987); State v. Spurr, 114 Idaho 277, 279 , 755 P.2d 1315, 1317 (Ct.App.1988). 1999State v. Allen, 113 Idaho 676, 679 , 747 P.2d 85, 88 (Ct.App.1987); State v. Spurr, 114 Idaho 277, 279 , 755 P.2d 1315, 1317 (Ct.App.1988). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Allengreen2 sentences1999State v. Allen, 113 Idaho 676, 679 , 747 P.2d 85, 88 (Ct.App.1987); State v. Spurr, 114 Idaho 277, 279 , 755 P.2d 1315, 1317 (Ct.App.1988). 1999State v. Allen, 113 Idaho 676, 679 , 747 P.2d 85, 88 (Ct.App.1987); State v. Spurr, 114 Idaho 277, 279 , 755 P.2d 1315, 1317 (Ct.App.1988). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Pennell
green
2 sentences1999A defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on every defense or theory of defense having any support in the evidence, State v. Kodesh, 122 Idaho 756, 758 , 838 P.2d 885, 887 (Ct.App.1992); State v. Evans, 119 Idaho 383 , 807 P.2d 62 (Ct.App.1991); State v. Mason, 111 Idaho 660, 669 , 726 P.2d 772, 781 (Ct.App.1986); State v. Pennell, 108 Idaho 669 , 701 P.2d 289 (Ct.App.1985), including, of course, the law of self-defense. 1999A defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on every defense or theory of defense having any support in the evidence, State v. Kodesh, 122 Idaho 756, 758 , 838 P.2d 885, 887 (Ct.App.1992); State v. Evans, 119 Idaho 383 , 807 P.2d 62 (Ct.App.1991); State v. Mason, 111 Idaho 660, 669 , 726 P.2d 772, 781 (Ct.App.1986); State v. Pennell, 108 Idaho 669 , 701 P.2d 289 (Ct.App.1985), including, of course, the law of self-defense. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Evans
green
2 sentences1999A defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on every defense or theory of defense having any support in the evidence, State v. Kodesh, 122 Idaho 756, 758 , 838 P.2d 885, 887 (Ct.App.1992); State v. Evans, 119 Idaho 383 , 807 P.2d 62 (Ct.App.1991); State v. Mason, 111 Idaho 660, 669 , 726 P.2d 772, 781 (Ct.App.1986); State v. Pennell, 108 Idaho 669 , 701 P.2d 289 (Ct.App.1985), including, of course, the law of self-defense. 1999A defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on every defense or theory of defense having any support in the evidence, State v. Kodesh, 122 Idaho 756, 758 , 838 P.2d 885, 887 (Ct.App.1992); State v. Evans, 119 Idaho 383 , 807 P.2d 62 (Ct.App.1991); State v. Mason, 111 Idaho 660, 669 , 726 P.2d 772, 781 (Ct.App.1986); State v. Pennell, 108 Idaho 669 , 701 P.2d 289 (Ct.App.1985), including, of course, the law of self-defense. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.