6 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Blankenship v. Weidnergreen2 sentences1994See, e.g., Blankenship v. Weidner, 120 Idaho 234 , 815 P.2d 432 (1991). 1994See, e.g., Blankenship v. Weidner, 120 Idaho 234 , 815 P.2d 432 (1991). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Franklin Osterhoudtgreen2 sentences2020Id.; see also Osterhoudt, 155 Idaho at 876 , 318 P.3d at 645 (holding the district court did not err in failing to give a limiting instruction sua sponte because the court is only required to give a limiting instruction when a party requests such an instruction). 2020Id.; see also Osterhoudt, 155 Idaho at 876 , 318 P.3d at 645 (holding the district court did not err in failing to give a limiting instruction sua sponte because the court is only required to give a limiting instruction when a party requests such an instruction). | 1 | 1 |
Jorgensen v. Coppedgegreen1 sentence2013But, “[a]n instruction is not to be given if it is an erroneous statement of the law, not supported by the facts, or adequately covered by the other instructions.” Schmechel, 148 Idaho at 185, 219 P.3d at 1201 (quoting Vanderford, 144 Idaho at 555 , 165 P.3d at 269 ). | 1 | 1 |
MacKay v. Four Rivers Packing Co.green2 sentences2013If a party requests an instruction on a theory, a trial court must give the instruction if the “theory is supported by any reasonable view of the evidence.” Mackay v. Four Rivers Packing Co., 151 Idaho 388, 392 , 257 P.3d 755, 759 (2011) (quoting Vanderford Co. v. Knudson, 144 Idaho 547, 555 , 165 P.3d 261, 269 (2007)). 2013If a party requests an instruction on a theory, a trial court must give the instruction if the “theory is supported by any reasonable view of the evidence.” Mackay v. Four Rivers Packing Co., 151 Idaho 388, 392 , 257 P.3d 755, 759 (2011) (quoting Vanderford Co. v. Knudson, 144 Idaho 547, 555 , 165 P.3d 261, 269 (2007)). | 1 | 1 |
Vanderford Co., Inc. v. Knudsongreen2 sentences2013If a party requests an instruction on a theory, a trial court must give the instruction if the “theory is supported by any reasonable view of the evidence.” Mackay v. Four Rivers Packing Co., 151 Idaho 388, 392 , 257 P.3d 755, 759 (2011) (quoting Vanderford Co. v. Knudson, 144 Idaho 547, 555 , 165 P.3d 261, 269 (2007)). 2013If a party requests an instruction on a theory, a trial court must give the instruction if the “theory is supported by any reasonable view of the evidence.” Mackay v. Four Rivers Packing Co., 151 Idaho 388, 392 , 257 P.3d 755, 759 (2011) (quoting Vanderford Co. v. Knudson, 144 Idaho 547, 555 , 165 P.3d 261, 269 (2007)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Moore
green
2 sentences2013Id. 2013Id. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
SCHMECHEL v. Dille
green
1 sentence2013But, “[a]n instruction is not to be given if it is an erroneous statement of the law, not supported by the facts, or adequately covered by the other instructions.” Schmechel, 148 Idaho at 185, 219 P.3d at 1201 (quoting Vanderford, 144 Idaho at 555 , 165 P.3d at 269 ). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Leazer v. Kiefer
green
1 sentence1991I.C. § 6-1012 states in relevant part that "individual providers of health care shall be judged in such cases in comparison with similarly trained and qualified providers of the same class in the same community, taking into account his or her training, experience, and fields of medical specialization, if any." The majority opinion also correctly acknowledges that, where a party requests an instruction in substantially the form as given, that party cannot complain "as it would have been invited error." Ante at 906, 821 P.2d at 961 ; McBride v. Ford Motor Co., 105 Idaho 753 , 673 P.2d 55 (1983). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
McBride v. Ford Motor Co.
green
2 sentences1991I.C. § 6-1012 states in relevant part that "individual providers of health care shall be judged in such cases in comparison with similarly trained and qualified providers of the same class in the same community, taking into account his or her training, experience, and fields of medical specialization, if any." The majority opinion also correctly acknowledges that, where a party requests an instruction in substantially the form as given, that party cannot complain "as it would have been invited error." Ante at 906, 821 P.2d at 961 ; McBride v. Ford Motor Co., 105 Idaho 753 , 673 P.2d 55 (1983). 1991I.C. § 6-1012 states in relevant part that "individual providers of health care shall be judged in such cases in comparison with similarly trained and qualified providers of the same class in the same community, taking into account his or her training, experience, and fields of medical specialization, if any." The majority opinion also correctly acknowledges that, where a party requests an instruction in substantially the form as given, that party cannot complain "as it would have been invited error." Ante at 906, 821 P.2d at 961 ; McBride v. Ford Motor Co., 105 Idaho 753 , 673 P.2d 55 (1983). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.