personnel commission hearing (Idaho) · Go Syfert
← Idaho issues

personnel commission hearing in Idaho

6 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2008 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Swisher v. State Department of Environmental & Community Servicesgreen
idaho · 1977 · cited in 2 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1992–2000
2 sentences

1992We therefore reiterate our holding in Swisher “that the proceedings before the personnel commission and its hearing officer and the appeal from the personnel commission to the district court must be conducted exclusively under the [PSA] and not under the APA.” Swisher, 98 Idaho at 570 , 569 P.2d at 915 (1977).

1992We therefore reiterate our holding in Swisher “that the proceedings before the personnel commission and its hearing officer and the appeal from the personnel commission to the district court must be conducted exclusively under the [PSA] and not under the APA.” Swisher, 98 Idaho at 570 , 569 P.2d at 915 (1977).

12
Idaho Department of Correction v. Andersongreen
idahoctapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008Fund v. Hunnicutt, 110 Idaho 257, 259 , 715 P.2d 927, 929 (1985); Idaho Dept. of Correction v. Anderson, 134 Idaho 680, 685 , 8 P.3d 675, 680 (Ct.App.2000) (“When a matter has been initially assigned to a Personnel Commission hearing officer and is subsequently appealed from the hearing officer’s decision to the Commission, the Commission conducts a de novo review of the record and renders an independent decision that effectively displaces the proposed decision of the hearing officer.”).

2008Fund v. Hunnicutt, 110 Idaho 257, 259 , 715 P.2d 927, 929 (1985); Idaho Dept. of Correction v. Anderson, 134 Idaho 680, 685 , 8 P.3d 675, 680 (Ct.App.2000) (“When a matter has been initially assigned to a Personnel Commission hearing officer and is subsequently appealed from the hearing officer’s decision to the Commission, the Commission conducts a de novo review of the record and renders an independent decision that effectively displaces the proposed decision of the hearing officer.”).

11
Idaho State Insurance Fund v. Hunnicuttgreen
idaho · 1986 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008Fund v. Hunnicutt, 110 Idaho 257, 259 , 715 P.2d 927, 929 (1985); Idaho Dept. of Correction v. Anderson, 134 Idaho 680, 685 , 8 P.3d 675, 680 (Ct.App.2000) (“When a matter has been initially assigned to a Personnel Commission hearing officer and is subsequently appealed from the hearing officer’s decision to the Commission, the Commission conducts a de novo review of the record and renders an independent decision that effectively displaces the proposed decision of the hearing officer.”).

2008Fund v. Hunnicutt, 110 Idaho 257, 259 , 715 P.2d 927, 929 (1985); Idaho Dept. of Correction v. Anderson, 134 Idaho 680, 685 , 8 P.3d 675, 680 (Ct.App.2000) (“When a matter has been initially assigned to a Personnel Commission hearing officer and is subsequently appealed from the hearing officer’s decision to the Commission, the Commission conducts a de novo review of the record and renders an independent decision that effectively displaces the proposed decision of the hearing officer.”).

11
Starr v. Idaho Transportation Departmentgreen
idahoctapp · 1990 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000Starr v. Idaho Transportation Dep’t, 118 Idaho 127, 129 , 795 P.2d 21, 23 (Ct.App.1990).

2000Starr v. Idaho Transportation Dep’t, 118 Idaho 127, 129 , 795 P.2d 21, 23 (Ct.App.1990).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Lockhart v. Department of Fish and Game green
idaho · 1992
1 sentence

2000Id. at 570 , 569 P.2d at 915 .

12000–2000
Bogner v. State Dept. of Revenue and Tax. green
idaho · 1984
2 sentences

1989The trial court examined our decision in Bogner v. State Dept. of Revenue & Taxation, 107 Idaho 854 , 693 P.2d 1056 (1984) in reaching his conclusion.

1989The trial court examined our decision in Bogner v. State Dept. of Revenue & Taxation, 107 Idaho 854 , 693 P.2d 1056 (1984) in reaching his conclusion.

11989–1989
State v. Roderick green
idaho · 1962
2 sentences

1977Thus, after considering the general rules of statutory construction that a specific statute will control rather than a general statute when their terms are in conflict, State v. Roderick, 85 Idaho 80 , 375 P.2d 1005 (1962), and that when statutes are in conflict the most recently enacted will control, Employment Security Agency v. Joint Class “A” School District No. 151, 88 Idaho 384 , 400 P.2d 377 (1965), and the explicit statement of I.C. § 67-5315 that all laws in conflict with the Personnel Commission Act are repealed to the extent of the conflict, *570 we conclude that the proceedings bef

1977Thus, after considering the general rules of statutory construction that a specific statute will control rather than a general statute when their terms are in conflict, State v. Roderick, 85 Idaho 80 , 375 P.2d 1005 (1962), and that when statutes are in conflict the most recently enacted will control, Employment Security Agency v. Joint Class “A” School District No. 151, 88 Idaho 384 , 400 P.2d 377 (1965), and the explicit statement of I.C. § 67-5315 that all laws in conflict with the Personnel Commission Act are repealed to the extent of the conflict, *570 we conclude that the proceedings bef

11977–1977
Employment Security Agency v. Joint Class \A\" School District No. 151" green
idaho · 1965
2 sentences

1977Thus, after considering the general rules of statutory construction that a specific statute will control rather than a general statute when their terms are in conflict, State v. Roderick, 85 Idaho 80 , 375 P.2d 1005 (1962), and that when statutes are in conflict the most recently enacted will control, Employment Security Agency v. Joint Class “A” School District No. 151, 88 Idaho 384 , 400 P.2d 377 (1965), and the explicit statement of I.C. § 67-5315 that all laws in conflict with the Personnel Commission Act are repealed to the extent of the conflict, *570 we conclude that the proceedings bef

1977Thus, after considering the general rules of statutory construction that a specific statute will control rather than a general statute when their terms are in conflict, State v. Roderick, 85 Idaho 80 , 375 P.2d 1005 (1962), and that when statutes are in conflict the most recently enacted will control, Employment Security Agency v. Joint Class “A” School District No. 151, 88 Idaho 384 , 400 P.2d 377 (1965), and the explicit statement of I.C. § 67-5315 that all laws in conflict with the Personnel Commission Act are repealed to the extent of the conflict, *570 we conclude that the proceedings bef

11977–1977

Statutes the citing opinions construe

ID § Idaho Code § 12-117 (5) ID § Idaho Code § 67-5316 (4) ID § Idaho Code § 67-5301 (3) ID § Idaho Code § 67-5317 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check